We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
ParkingEye- I'm paying
Options
Comments
-
AltheHibby wrote: »Traindriver,
You're right, it is personal. Your post perfectly illustrates what these parasites rely on. I had a friend pay in Scotland rather than face the stress of continually writing back to them. I had told her to simply ignore and it would go away. It frustated me no end, but I had to let it go.
Al.
ps I hope you do end up paying £60; preferably at a decent restuarant with your family while celebrating your victory. :-)
I am gone past the £60 stage. It's now £165 or nothing!0 -
Traindriver4 wrote: »I now ask myself this - would I have been better off paying the initial £60. In hindsight, and I am sorry to disappoint all the good and helpful people on this forum, my answer is YES.
No reason why you can't offer to pay £60 now if that's what you'd rather do. As long as you mark the letter 'without prejudice' it can't be used in court.Traindriver wrote:I am gone past the £60 stage. It's now £165 or nothing!0 -
Traindriver4 wrote: »I have stated I am going to make a stand even though the outcome is not clear cut. Previous judgements for and against the PPC's are not precedents. The whole thing sucks and becomes a lottery. I can understand yours and other people's hatred of the PPC's but they are conducting their business LEGALLY and their court threats are REAL. Until such time as when motorists can collectively take these PPCs to court, it is going to be down to the individual to make decisions based on their own circumstances. So please stop being judgemental!
But they aren't running them 100% legally. ACS Law operated a business model that extorted over a £1,000,000 before the scam was closed down in court. They are sailing as close to the wind as possible and in some cases, I'd say beyond. Just because certain aspects of their case have never been fully tested in court, does not mean it say what they are doing is legal.
These invoices are cleverly designed to look like genuine parking tickets as issued by The Police and Council Wardens. If they simply said "invoice for breach of contract" then far less people would pay up. Add to this the pre-estimate of loss, etc, etc, then if this really got tested in court, then a precedent would be set. We do already have some good test cases, which we quote to PoPLA and in Court, but like anything legal, you win some and lose some.Search my post " PoPLA evidence - What to submit" on what is a good defense for a PoPLA appeal.0 -
Keeper liability in POFA 2012 = PCN sum + court fee. No CCJ if you lose then pay.
TURN UP FOR THE HEARING!
YOU WIN IF THEY DON'T SHOW!
('PE' = ParkingEye)
25/11/14 PE v Cargius Wrexham A0JD1405 DDJ Mahy
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2014/12/motorist-injured-on-snowdon-wins.html
http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=95294
DJ found no loss. £100 not proportionate to £2. OP was injured/delayed at Snowdon Mountain Railway.
17/11/14 District Enforcement v Gary Hudson, A3QK0123 re Staffs Uni
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2014/12/district-enforcement-lose-to-lecturer.html
DDJ Evans: "signs are misleading.''
14/11/2014 3JD06925 PE v Hopewell Halifax DJ Heels
http://www.parkingcowboys.co.uk/2014-12-wrong-registration-court-case/
Wrong registration input.
CEL case :
http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=92131&st=20&start=20
CEL either do not turn up at hearings when defended:
http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=95254
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/civil-enforcement-limited-fail-to.html
or CEL pretend the case is off! But they still lose:
A66YM205 29/10/14 CEL v Mr X. Liverpool
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2014_11_01_archive.html
CEL case stayed for Beavis
http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=93009
DJ Scannell at Bridgend.
24/9/14 District Enforcement v Jones A3QK0132 Telford
Stayed for Beavis
3/10/2014 A3QZ5517 Devere v Mr X, Bournemouth
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5075810
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/devere-lose-in-bournmouth.html
Devere had a headache at 2 cases that week but we are gagged on the first!
Sept 2014 - PE MCOL claim sent to OP in Scotland!
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5061537
Struck out.
11/9/14 A0JD5671 PE v Harding, Portsmouth
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4908490
Posts 166 & 171. Looking for a space = not parking (like Fistral case 17/3/14). DJ Murphy said signs 'failure to comply with THIS' = unclear, like PE v Lemon & Harris, below!
+ Mike aka '45mip19lot' A0JD5709 PE v Pimlott same day, struck out. PE hadn't paid fee!
3/9/14 3JD04003 PE v Mr X, Kingston.
DDJ Jones gave Judgment to PE. BUT suspended enforcement till 42 days after Beavis (appeal April 2015 if PE lose Beavis).
1/9/14 3JD04749 ParkingEye v Cargill, Preston
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4844056
Small overstay was in grace period.
21/8/14 A60YJ295 Local Parking Security v Quinn, Birmingham
http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=92639
OP got £120 - LPS didn't turn up!
8/8/14 Civil Enforcement v Voice (prelim hearing), Newport IOW A12YM229
http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=90440&st=100
PPC did not turn up. OP invoiced Co-op & CEL for costs.
8/8/14 Armtrac (KBT) v Bracey - Truro 3YU60071
http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=92490&st=0&p=989752&#entry989752
Armtrac did not turn up, case struck out.
PE v Cieslewicz, Stafford, A0JD0514
6/8/14
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2014/08/parkingeye-spanked-in-court-judge-sees.html
PE rep tried to intimidate OP with wedge of PE cases won. The 'McKenzie friend' whipped out cases lost by PE! The rep snapped 'Where did you get these? They're not available to someone like you.' They laughed (from the Prankster's website!). Judge: no standing/Hotel closed.
PE v Adams 18th July 2014, Derby, DJ Williscroft
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5020237
http://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/Motorist-8216-ecstatic-8217-Derby-court-victory/story-21658621-detail/story.html
PE v Ms X, 10/7/2014, Birmingham.
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2014/07/parkingeye-lose-in-court-genuine.html
No loss.
2 x UKCPS:
A0QZ7658 (4/7/14 Bradford)
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2014/07/ukcps-claim-dismissed-judge-rules.html
Judge: sign was 'gibberish'!
A3QZ1305 (2/7/14 Sheffield)
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5010394
Judge Birkby: signs unreadable/too much info.
PE claims stayed for Beavis:
June 2014: Sheffield, DJ Baddeley, PE v Mr X, A0JD4266
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5006337
stayed 18/6/14 by DJ Swindley, Bolton Court:
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4987734
PE & VCS cases stayed for Beavis:
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/vcs-and-parkingeye-court-cases.html
4/6/14 3JD05453 PE v Scott, South Shields
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=takbbn&s=8#.U5NsN03Qepo
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4989761
PE had to pay c£150 for untruth 'case settled' - in fact they withdrew it! OP threatened to send in bailiffs!
30/05/2014 3QT62386, PE v Arora. DJ Jenkins, Brentford.
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4983349
http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=79285
PE failed to comply with Order - OP granted £90 costs.
16/05/2014 3JD05392 - PE v Mrs S. DJ Neaves, Scarborough
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4973318
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/parkingeye-lose-in-court-reason-not.html
LPC rep had no 'right of audience'.
"Have you travel costs?" asked the DJ. We had 2 P&D tickets. "It's a PE Car Park" said the DJ, "How ironic!"
12/05/14 3JD04329 PE v Martin, St Albans, DJ Cross
http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=90283
Double visit! DJ rubbished contract, VCS v HMRC = irrelevant. £100+ paid by PE.
8/5/14 3JD09409 - PE v Green, High Wycombe, DJ Jones
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4966140
DJ: No consideration from motorist & damages for breach isn't 'executory consideration'.
April 2014 UKCPS stayed for POPLA: http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=87364 (shows a letter to send to the local Judge).
28/4/14 PE v Mr K, 3JD09258, DJ Robertson, Durham.
http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=89921
City Hospitals Sunderland had said: 'PE cancelled. No need to attend court.' Hearing wasn't cancelled; the OP turned up but PE didn't!
22/4/14 3JD02360 Burnley - PE v Elliott - DJ McQueen
http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=89759T
Time spent at McDs drive-thru not 'parked'. Like Fistral case 17/3/14, below!
17/4/14 3JD08195 PE v Said, Romford, DJ Lewis
'When PE said they 'observed' the car, it wasn't there.' (Judgment seen, 23rd April).
24/4/14 3YQ53901 APCOA Parking v Hull Kingston, DJ Smart
OP cited dropped APCOA cases 5th Feb (see below) no loss, APCOA are paid.
She paid to strike out:
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/apcoa-case-struck-out.html
http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=83479
APCOA wanted £700 but ended up paying Molly £200!
''DJ Smart interested, said at some point 'one will go to appeal'.
15/4/14 :
http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=84659
'DJ not satisfied that we'd seen signs'.
14/4/14 UKCPS v Gaskell 3QZ55265, Cardiff.
Judge took time - hearing adjourned for his decision. OP won £51 costs. DJ Dawson trashed the business model, saying: 'it is difficult to see where there is actual loss resulting from the non-payment of this demand; and therefore it is difficult to see how high a figure as £100 (or any figure) can be a GPEOL.'
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4949627
http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=85893&mode=linearplus
https://www.dropbox.com/s/xw9hqmb3ag35el2/UKCPS-v-Gaskell.pdf
10/4/2014 3JD10556, PE v Pointer Coventry.
DDJ Salmon: driver paid/displayed. No loss.
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4944755
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/parkingeye-lose-in-court-machine.html
8/4/2014 PE v Mr M.
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/parkingeye-lose-case-judge-decides.html
PE's VRN pics only showed front. 'evidence fabricated'.
4/4/2014, 3JD10885, PE v Griffiths, Edmonton.
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/65169410#Comment_65169410
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/parkingeye-lose-in-court-anpr-system.html
Confident defendant - double visit.
4/4/2014, 3JD09864 PE v Greenhall, Dudley.
http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=86186&st=20
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/parkingeye-lose-in-court-another-5.html
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/fax-machine-2-parkingeye-0.html
DJ ''no loss for PE.''
4/4/2014, 3JD10322, PE v Sheppard, Dudley.
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/65171057#Comment_65171057
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/parkingeye-lose-in-court-against-fax.html
We faxed 'Amicus Curiae' pack, defendant thanked benefactor by email!
2/4/2014 Sheffield, 3QZ64216, VCS v Finn (8 tickets!).
http://www.thestar.co.uk/features/action-desk/victory-for-sheffield-woman-in-parking-battle-1-6611897
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4937373
DJ: ObServices v Thurlow = only relevant appeal case re 'GPEOL' - 'if the business operates like this it must owe a lot of money'! VCS paid Ms Finn £95 costs.
28/3/2014 3JD13428 PE v Williams, Derby, DDJ Potts
No contract shown.
28/3/2014 3JD09341 PE v Jones, Bristol Retail Park. DDJ Batstone agreed with PE v Collins-Daniel. Signs 'wholly deficient'.
3JD01136 PE v Gallen hearing due March 27th, Milton Keynes:
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/65047704#Comment_65047704
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/parking-eye-wave-white-flag-chicken-out.html
Excellent defence. PE discontinued!
19/03/2014 Liverpool 3YS03190 Aintree Hospital v Mr X
http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=83946&st=40
OP cited: Aintree v Helmn (20/8/2010) re parking in a disabled bay without a blue badge.
The DJ in Helmn and in this 2014 case, found it a penalty not a GPEOL. Unenforceable.
17/3/2014 Altrincham, 3JD08399 PE v Ms X. Fistral Beach.
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/waiting-for-space-is-not-parking.html
DJ: driving round not parking. READ THIS - 'FISTRAL DUDE'S SLEEPLESS NIGHTS! :
http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=88955
13/3/2014 Aylesbury, 3JD10678 PE v Rickard
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4920683
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/parkingeye-fail-to-impress-judge.html
http://nebula.wsimg.com/a49001ff23e640998dab24c8775da4ff?AccessKeyId=4CB8F2392A09CF228A46&disposition=0&alloworigin=1
DJ: no standing/contract redacted/unreadable.
10/3/2014 Derby, 3JD06363 PE v Tubey DJ Stark
10/3/2014 Warrington, 3JD04274 PE v Slijvic
Holiday Inn, Sheffield. DDJ Glassbrook.
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4918142
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/parkingeye-0-slijvic-1-parkingeye-legal.html
PE said they were the principal, contradiction. Signs inconsistent.
PE paid Slijvic £208 - he sent bailiff in on April Fool's Day!!
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/guest-blog-bailiffs-turn-up-at.html
24/2/2014 Stoke-on-Trent, 3JD08925, PE v Watson
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4905516
Over-redacted contract. PE had to pay £90 costs.
21/2/2014 3YS16797 Ipswich. RANSOMES (PROSERVE = notorious non AOS):
http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=86932&st=200&p=929285&hl=Proserve&#entry929285
Proserve admitted 'parking enforcement'
Appeal Oct 2014 Duff in trouble:
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/ransomes-lose-in-court-proserve.html
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4903438
http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=93337
21/2/2014 (originally Watford): Civil Enforcement v McCafferty 3YK50188 (AP476)
Feb 2014, CIVIL ENFORCEMENT lost AGAIN, Appeal at Luton:
http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=88126
CEL had a QC, but Senior Judge Mr Recorder Gibson QC said £150 was not a genuine offer to park, purpose was to deter = a penalty.
12/2/2014 3JD08473 PE v Mason, Sheffield, DJ Birkby.
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/parkingeye-suffer-premature.html
DJ not impressed with PE!
http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=84227&st=20&p=925905&#entry925905
11/2/2014 3JD03769 PE v Baddeley, Birmingham, DJ Bull.
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/why-size-does-matter-parkingeyes-3.htmlJ
DJ agreed defendant's estimate of £5 'loss' - PE couldn't explain their sum! Commercial justification - NO, it benefits retailers if people shop for longer.
11/2/2014 3JD10502 PE v Mrs P, Blackburn, DDJ Buckley.
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4844795
ORDERED:
1. the claim shall be stayed {for} POPLA
2. In default of any request to return the claim to the list/request a further stay, the claim shall be deemed struck out.''
5/2/2014 3YQ53850 and 3YQ53894 - APCOA DROPPED TWO NHS CLAIMS
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/64601793#Comment_64601793
Full story: http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=83241
See also 'APCOA v Hull' struck out, 24/4/2014 above.
30/1/2014 3JD02430 PE v Howe, Rhyll, DJ Thomas.
Crewe Arms, signs useless. Witness co. didn't exist.
29/1/2014 3JD02462 PE v Thomas, Preston, re Churchill Way, Leyland. DJ Buckley - signs inadequate.
24/1/2014 3JD06533 PE v Collins-Daniel Bristol
Transcript:
http://nebula.wsimg.com/822ec190e09a5224d8e8a9c97304e849?AccessKeyId=4CB8F2392A09CF228A46&disposition=0&alloworigin=1
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4881027
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/parkingeye-accuse-forums-of-vendetta-in.html
PE's rep accused forums of 'vendetta' Showing contract breaks 'confidentiality law'! DDJ Melville-Shreeve ripped PE a new one, debunked contact/standing/signage, their punctuation - everything!
24/1/2014 PE v Taylor, 3JD05814 Morpeth & Berwick, DJ Howard.
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4878711
'PE showed no contract.''
23/1/2014 PE v Gosnold, 3JD02357 High Wycombe, DJ Devlin.
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/64469085#Comment_64469085
DJ: no standing, unreadable contract. PE had to pay £90 costs.
17/1/2014 3JD02719 PE v Davison, Peterborough.
http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=81150&st=80&p=916329&#entry916329
PE wrote to court re a 'mistake' but no copy to OP. Signs differed, £90/£100, undated photos.
2 cases same day, 'no loss/wrong claimant/PE not landowner':
Case #1 Barrow-in-Furness 19/12/2013 DDJ Buckley
3JD00517 PE v Clarke
DJ: PE's business model = 'NONSENSE':
http://nebula.wsimg.com/71a4eb1b5de25e5c60b4d5cacfed6b40?AccessKeyId=4CB8F2392A09CF228A46&disposition=0&alloworigin=1
Case #2 Barrow-in-Furness 19/12/2013 DDJ Buckley
3JD02555 PE v Pearce
This chap not on forums, facts identical - his/her lucky day!
3JD04791 ParkingEye Ltd - Heggie at Barnsley Court 13/12/2013
'I entered my 2nd car reg. PE had found my payment.' Judge: no loss.
3QT89605 Premier Parking Solutions v Halstead (Accrington) 10/12/2013
struck out, no-show Premier Parking Solutions - they had to pay OP costs.
Three won, same day: https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4840977
PE v Rogers 3JD00565, Colchester 6/12/13
Signs lacking but PE showed a full set of signs & people in shorts/Summer Sale! PCN was in Nov.
Cases #2 & #3: 3QT62681 and 3QT62156, Southampton (PE v Lemon, & PE v Harris). 6/12/13
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/how-to-win-parkingeye-court-hearing.html
DJ: signs inadequate & contract Feb 2013 (PCN Oct 2012).
ParkingEye v Gardam
3QT60598 High Wycombe 14 November 2013
DJ Jones followed PE v Sharma. PE had to pay £90.
ParkingEye v Walkden
3QT52338 PE v Walkden 29/10/2013 Barrow in Furness. Contract dated Feb 2013 but PCN Oct 2012. Witness statement undated. DJ Dodd: no standing.
PE CASES DROPPED:
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4812058 PE v Ms Byrne (claim no. 3JD04522) Dropped!
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4814441 PE v Ms Barrett. (claim no. 3QT61897) Dropped!
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/parkingeye-drop-case-against-motorist.html
ParkingEye v Sharma.
3QT62646 Brentford 23/10/2013 DJ Jenkins.
DJ: no standing/no contract with drivers.
on PE's website, 2 losses:
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/63632452#Comment_63632452
22/07/2013 3QT51179 PE v Lomax
PE pics of another car park in Grantham!
17/07/2013 3QT33300 PE v Scott
DJ: driver couldn't have read the contract.
Devere v resident of flats: Oct 2013:
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4812338
Excel v Greenwood 3QT60496 4/10/13 (disabled, forgot Blue Badge). DJ: Excel should have cancelled as OP had MS/no loss.
OLDER CASES :
OPC v Thurlow, Worcs, 10/02/2011 0QT34807 (HHJ Pearce-Higgins QC) landmark appeal case:
- sum = unenforceable penalty
- no loss
- Arthur v Anker & Vine v Waltham Forest = irrelevant.
Parking Eye v Smith Manchester Nov 2011 1XJ81016 (PE 'won' £15, anything above P&D fee = a PENALTY)
UKCPS v Murphy penalty - 1QZ30035 Burnley 10/4/12
UKCPS v Perkins
VCS v Ibbotson (also here and here)1SE09849 16/5/12
Excel v Martin Cutts & here & here Stockport, 15/9/11 1SE02795 Judgment in Appx B here: http://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/plcdev/files/124/original/DVLA-BPA-Cutts19Apr2012.pdf).
Excel v Hetherington-Jakeman 18/3/08 transcript here: http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?act=attach&type=post&id=4984
Excel lose again = farce of Bawtry Council car park.
NCP v Mayhook update here re huge costs he claimed!
More info here, post #44:
http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=79937&st=40
Useful case law:
http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=82476
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4695227
OPC fined: http://www.expressandstar.com/news/2011/10/07/parking-firm-drop-their-appeal-over-fine/
Guilty of intent - fined £26K+ admitted 23 charges by Trading Standards.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0 -
Great post CM - I've linked it into the Welcome sticky thread.0
-
UPDATE
No letters yet.....
Thanks everyone
MG0 -
I am an ordinary member of the public...with two lawyers for sons. I got a ticket when out with one of them, they told me to ignore, at times as the penalty climbed, and the threats got worse, I got jittery. I sat tight, and....they were right, it went away.0
-
The problem with thisI am an ordinary member of the public...with two lawyers for sons. I got a ticket when out with one of them, they told me to ignore, at times as the penalty climbed, and the threats got worse, I got jittery. I sat tight, and....they were right, it went away.
Is this
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/small_claims_from_bpa_aos_member
Parking Eye has issued thousands of claims, still it's a minority of cases.When posting a parking issue on MSE do not reveal any information that may enable PPCs to identify you. They DO monitor the forum.
We don't need the following to help you.
Name, Address, PCN Number, Exact Date Of Incident, Date On Invoice, Reg Number, Vehicle Picture, The Time You Entered & Left Car Park, Or The Amount of Time You Overstayed.
:beer: Anti Enforcement Hobbyist Member :beer:0 -
No letters yet
MGx0 -
No letters0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 350.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.4K Spending & Discounts
- 243.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 256.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards