We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Sky TV retention deals ( post your haggling successes )
Comments
-
I think the way to look at this these days is a "good" deal may well be anything between £1 - £10 more than you are paying now for exactly the same package, taking into account that the previous Netflix non ads package that Sky were flogging a couple of years ago for £5 or £6 is now £10.50 with the cheaper Netflix coming with ads. Unless you are very very lucky I doubt that you will get the same package for the same price or lower which sometimes used to be the case with negotiations with them. Hence why after paying £55 previously and being offered £68-£78 before the 31 days cancellation policy I eventually took the £63 pm offer, which will probably turn into £65-£68 when mid term price rises hit. I could have held on and sent the box back but unlike when I did that 10 years ago I couldn't really see a 50% off offer landing on my doormat.
It also has to be said that whoever you speak to on phone or live chat it is a lottery from day to day. Also whilst cutting back on what you have to save money might seem a good idea check first how it affects your prices. For instance my discounts on sports and cinema are linked so if I dumped cinema my sports price would go up, quite feasibly at a higher rate than what cinema actually costs.0 -
MouldyOldDough said:JSmithy45AD said:Max68 said:Contract I took out last week on Sky Q is for 18 months as well.0
-
JSmithy45AD said:MouldyOldDough said:JSmithy45AD said:Max68 said:Contract I took out last week on Sky Q is for 18 months as well.0
-
MouldyOldDough said:Sky have too much unrestricted power to charge what they like with price rises apparently whenever they likeIt should be under more control, like ISP's/mobile phone contract prices.It is virtually a necessity.Considering so many of us are basically stuck with Sky for life, with no real option (yes NOW TV and Virgin come close) but nobody does it as well as Sky - Sky knows that it has a captive audience as well...2
-
MouldyOldDough said:Sky have too much unrestricted power to charge what they like with price rises apparently whenever they likeIt should be under more control, like ISP's/mobile phone contract prices.It is virtually a necessity.Considering so many of us are basically stuck with Sky for life, with no real option (yes NOW TV and Virgin come close) but nobody does it as well as Sky - Sky knows that it has a captive audience as well...
And it most definitely isn't a 'necessity', either virtual or not.
Have you heard of Freesat or Freeview by any chance? I'm not sure how you think they have a 'captive audience' either as there's plenty of options such as streaming services (including not paying for TV).0 -
JSmithy45AD said:JSmithy45AD said:MouldyOldDough said:JSmithy45AD said:Max68 said:Contract I took out last week on Sky Q is for 18 months as well.JSmithy45AD said:JSmithy45AD said:MouldyOldDough said:JSmithy45AD said:Max68 said:Contract I took out last week on Sky Q is for 18 months as well.1
-
brewerdave said:JSmithy45AD said:JSmithy45AD said:MouldyOldDough said:JSmithy45AD said:Max68 said:Contract I took out last week on Sky Q is for 18 months as well.JSmithy45AD said:JSmithy45AD said:MouldyOldDough said:JSmithy45AD said:Max68 said:Contract I took out last week on Sky Q is for 18 months as well.0
-
Way I look at it these days is that with my £63 subscription that equates at £15.75 a week. In the good old days when Video rental shops existed I would probably rent at least three films a week and now that would be at least £3-5 a film I suspect which on its own would be £9 - £15 a week and obviously cinema tickets are quite expensive themselves these days so all things considered £15.75 a week for a full entertainment package isn't too bad.0
-
Max68 said:Way I look at it these days is that with my £63 subscription that equates at £15.75 a week. In the good old days when Video rental shops existed I would probably rent at least three films a week and now that would be at least £3-5 a film I suspect which on its own would be £9 - £15 a week and obviously cinema tickets are quite expensive themselves these days so all things considered £15.75 a week for a full entertainment package isn't too bad.
No matter how I look at it, it's expensive.0 -
JSmithy45AD said:Max68 said:Way I look at it these days is that with my £63 subscription that equates at £15.75 a week. In the good old days when Video rental shops existed I would probably rent at least three films a week and now that would be at least £3-5 a film I suspect which on its own would be £9 - £15 a week and obviously cinema tickets are quite expensive themselves these days so all things considered £15.75 a week for a full entertainment package isn't too bad.
No matter how I look at it, it's expensive.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453K Spending & Discounts
- 242.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.4K Life & Family
- 255.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards