Flight delay and cancellation compensation, Jet2.com ONLY

NoviceAngel

DrA_Harrogate wrote: »

My guess (and if you have another feel free to mention it) is that they have decided to await a Huzar Appeal.

Can't believe that's happened, but then again - Yes I can

In a way, you're lucky that the Birds haven't requested a 'stay' on your case, that's the latest news that is going around. So hopefully you'll get a result before Feb. I believe the Birds application to request permission to appeal is due to be heard sometime in Jan 14.

Of course, if permission is denied, then I bet there will be quite a few more posts on this thread, including my own.

Hang in there DrA:T

Loopieloo85

We were on a cancelled flight from dalaman on 28/09/2013. I wrote to jet2 and got the usual rejection letter. I reopened this with CAA on 28/10/2013 sending all the documentation through.

Since i have not heard anything and wondered if this is normal? I have sent an email since checking on the progress but just receive an automated response to say they will be in touch.

Thanks in advance
Laura

NoviceAngel

Loopieloo85 wrote: »

We were on a cancelled flight from dalaman on 28/09/2013......Since i have not heard anything and wondered if this is normal? I have sent an email since checking on the progress but just receive an automated response to say they will be in touch.

Thanks in advance
Laura

Hi Laura,

You're wasting your time with the CAA. You will need to start court proceedings. You can do this yourself or use a NWNF Solicitors. I know Bott & Co are acting for some forum members on here.

The first step, would be to write to Jet2 with a notice before action. There's loads of info on this thread, start with a sticky bun and coffee from page 1.

Cheers

NoviceAngel

JPears

NoviceAngel wrote: »

Hi Laura,

You're wasting your time with the CAA. You will need to start court proceedings. You can do this yourself or use a NWNF Solicitors. I know Bott & Co are acting for some forum members on here.

The first step, would be to write to Jet2 with a notice before action. There's loads of info on this thread, start with a sticky bun and coffee from page 1.

Cheers


NoviceAngel

And abouyt 4 sticky buns and coffees later you should be all set ready to go. As its Jet2 , Bott & Co might be keen to take the case

Loopieloo85

JPears wrote: »

And abouyt 4 sticky buns and coffees later you should be all set ready to go. As its Jet2 , Bott & Co might be keen to take the case

Thanks for the info, could you provide the link for the FAQ's as i am struggling to fid them? It does make me wonder though why the regulator is not interested in helping, i always thought they were on our side.

Thanks again

111KAB

Loopieloo85 wrote: »

......could you provide the link for the FAQ's as i am struggling to fid them? It does make me wonder though why the regulator is not interested in helping, i always thought they were on our side.

Page One second post. Plenty of posts regarding the reason the CAA are siding with the airlines.

NoviceAngel

I've heard of a case today, that was struck out of MCOL by the district judge, who stated that the case for compensation could not be pursued by MCOL and that he/she would have to make a manual paper claim via the local courts.

Something about not in accordance with CPR 7e.

Having looked at CPR7e, I still find that such a ruling completely wrong and bizarre to say the least.

So now the claimant has to pay court fees for a second time, and I understand that they can't add the rejected claim fees to a new claim. A double whammy!

The original claimant paid the initial MCOL fee, then a second court fee at the time of the directions questionaire.

I must admit, a little shocked at this one.

NoviceAngel

CobyBenson

That's extremely odd indeed.

The only valid reasons I could think of are that
a) the claimant tried to claim in Euros only (although I don't think this is possible on MCOL)
b) the claimant is a child
c) the claimant used an address that wasn't in the UK

If the Court took the issue fee then the claim must be issued and therefore served.

If the court hasn't issued the claim then the claimant should certainly be entitled to a refund - I would complain about that.

NoviceAngel

CobyBenson wrote: »

That's extremely odd indeed.

The only valid reasons I could think of are that
a) the claimant tried to claim in Euros only (although I don't think this is possible on MCOL)
b) the claimant is a child
c) the claimant used an address that wasn't in the UK

If the Court took the issue fee then the claim must be issued and therefore served.

If the court hasn't issued the claim then the claimant should certainly be entitled to a refund - I would complain about that.

Hi Coby,

I can confirm that neither a b or c applied in this case.

The case was issued as normal via MCOL, Jet2 were served. The defence by the defendant had been received.

The directions questionnaire was completed and returned with a fee (£40) it was then just this morning, when the Claimant telephoned MCOL, that they were advised that the DJ had struck out the case.

I know the case was never transferred out from Northampton CC - it's all ended at that stage.

NoviceAngel

CobyBenson

That makes a bit more sense (believe it or not!)

The claimant should get an order from the court detailing why it has been struck out.

If he disagrees with the reason then he can make an application to have the case re-instated, but that usually needs to be made within 7 days of receiving the order.