Registry cleaner

dixie_dean_2

Errr, sorry to interupt the argument, but how do I log on to my router?

The_Safordian

dixie_dean wrote: »

Errr, sorry to interupt the argument, but how do I log on to my router?

Routers are usually 192.168.0.1

espresso

dixie_dean wrote: »

Errr, sorry to interupt the argument, but how do I log on to my router?

Did you read post #37?

Who is your ISP?

Who supplied this router?

What is the make/model number?

You seem to think that others can help you while blindfolded!

The_Safordian

anewhope wrote: »

How?

look up what fragmentation means. Defraging makes it easier for the computer which in turn speeds things up

anewhope wrote: »

I have never seen anything credible in support of the claims perpetrated by these type of programs.

Don't try it then what-ever you do, you'll be in for a shock

[Deleted User]

The_Safordian wrote: »

look up what fragmentation means. Defraging makes it easier for the computer which in turn speeds things up

I understand fragmentation, but it's clear you don't if you think defragmenting the registry will lead to any performance benefits.

Don't try it then what-ever you do, you'll be in for a shock

Maintaining the size of the registry was only something necessary for NT4/2000 servers that had a physical cap on the size that the registry could expand too. Once that cap was reached, nothing further could be held which led to stability issues; something you don't want on a server.

I can't logically see how a few unused file extensions would be enough to seriously impact the performance of a PC when significant amounts of processing power are unused during normal operations.

dixie_dean_2

espresso wrote: »

Did you read post #37?

Who is your ISP?

Who supplied this router?

What is the make/model number?

You seem to think that others can help you while blindfolded!

Apologies, missed that amidst the other posts. ISP is madasafish and they supplied the router. It's safecom - not sure of the model.

espresso

dixie_dean wrote: »

Apologies, missed that amidst the other posts. ISP is madasafish and they supplied the router. It's safecom - not sure of the model.

MAAF are now in effect Plusnet so try this here.

The_Safordian

anewhope wrote: »

I understand fragmentation, but it's clear you don't if you think defragmenting the registry will lead to any performance benefits.

Then why ask such a silly question. You obviously prefer doing nothing while ignoring all the features that kit has. You also wish to ignore all the positive reviews because you know better than everyone else...................tells me something about you, Jack

anewhope wrote: »

Maintaining the size of the registry was only something necessary for NT4/2000 servers that had a physical cap on the size that the registry could expand too. Once that cap was reached, nothing further could be held which led to stability issues; something you don't want on a server.

NT4 was NT4, Windows 2000 was NT5 like XP

So acting silly and then coming back to try looking clever hasn't worked

espresso

The_Safordian wrote: »

So acting silly and then coming back to try looking clever hasn't worked

You just act silly all of the time!

[Deleted User]

The_Safordian wrote: »

Then why ask such a silly question. You obviously prefer doing nothing while ignoring all the features that kit has. You also wish to ignore all the positive reviews because you know better than everyone else...................tells me something about you, Jack

I never put much confidence in reviews, especially ones for products that promise great things in return for money. Those who have parted with money will always find a way to justify it.

NT4 was NT4, Windows 2000 was NT5 like XP

So acting silly and then coming back to try looking clever hasn't worked

NT4 and 2000 were the product names, not kernel versions. If you want to be pedantic, the XP product family used version 5.1 & 5.2 of the NT Kernel.