Am I being awful?

Kazz81

Mrss wrote: »

I am truly incensed by you - i am boiling with anger.

My husband has a silly ex like you who "cant get him out her head" "wonders if he is the one " BLAH BLAH BLAH and it ( she ) has caused me so much pain and upset with her existence that i hate her with a passion.
It is all very innocent on my husbands side - she is the one who sends the immature texts ( he shows and tells me about them ) but the fact is she is a sad !!!!! who incidentally is also married with children who my husband slept with 20 years ago before we met and still hankers after him and flirts and suggest meeting "for old times sake "

You are this other women - I only hope this man has enough balls to show his wife what you are and to keep away from you.

You are a disgrace to women.

This is exactly why the OP should leave it alone, but you know what, she wont. And will be back on here in a few months time under a different user name bemoaning the breakdown of her marriage and wondering why.

Mrss_3

flossy_splodge wrote: »

Sorry for your own experiences but in this case, it takes two!
I believe HE contacted HER?
And sometimes sad stories do have happy ever afters, just not often!:(

OP said she contacted him.
Do not feel sorry for me - I can trust my husband - its silly slappers like the OP who think its ok to jeopardize marriages/relationships that deserve pity.

I only hope she loses everything and lives the rubbish life she deserves.

Mrss_3

Kazz81 wrote: »

This is exactly why the OP should leave it alone, but you know what, she wont. And will be back on here in a few months time under a different user name bemoaning the breakdown of her marriage and wondering why.

Hopefully !:rotfl:

gratefulforhelp_2

There's a baby involved.

JimmyTheWig

shellsuit wrote: »

you're already deceiving your husband

There is a chance, OP, that you are deceiving yourself.
There is a chance that you think it is innocent because you want to think it is innocent. If you think it isn't then you can't meet him. But you want to meet him. So you convince yourself that it is innocent.

Now, there is a reason why you asked on here for advice. I would imagine that it's because you trus the views of posters on here.
Well, you've had those views.

It could still be, you might be thinking, that you've just happened to get 100+ responses from the most prudish posters on MSE.
Yes, that's possible - but so blindingly unlikely.

We don't know you, OP. If you want to pretend to us that it's innocent then go ahead. Doesn't do anyone any good, but doesn't do anyone much harm.
Your husband (presumably) loves you something rotten. If you want to pretend to him that it's innocent then on your head be it.
But don't, whatever you do, pretend to yourself. If you want to take the second step towards having an affair then we can't stop you. But don't fool yourself for one minute that that's not what you are doing.

shellsuit

gratefulforhelp wrote: »

There's a baby involved.

I don't understand sorry?

gratefulforhelp_2

Following post 114, the gist of which is "hopefully...the op will be back moaning about her marriage breakdown" my point being it isn't something to be wished for as there's a baby involved.

gonzo127

flossy_splodge wrote: »

Sorry to be naive but can someone please explain the use of the word 'trout'?
Seriously. The others listed I am conversant with :rotfl:but I've never heard 'trout'.
I love words and really want to know this so please help someone as others seem to be familiar with it being used in the way it is.
Oh, is it because something 'fishy' is going on?:o

haha me and my mate used to joke that we was going 'trouting' when we went clubbing in a sense of casting our line out and seeing if we could get some dumb creature to gobble our bait...

oh how crude and mature we were back then :rotfl:

clearing_out_my_pockets

flossy_splodge wrote: »

Sorry for your own experiences but in this case, it takes two!
I believe HE contacted HER?
And sometimes sad stories do have happy ever afters, just not often!:(

You might be referring to my story there rather than OP's...

Mrss_3

gratefulforhelp wrote: »

Following post 114, the gist of which is "hopefully...the op will be back moaning about her marriage breakdown" my point being it isn't something to be wished for as there's a baby involved.

It is not OP's baby - it is the lusted after mans who I am hoping has more sense than OP.