We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Any way I can convince my principled wife to stop giving away £500 a month?
Comments
-
No need to lecture me - I’m not the OP.lisyloo said:
Then you still haven't taken fully on board what we agreed earlier.Abbafan1972 said:I can’t believe the OP is still with this person.
The consequences that the OP has to consider is that he may get reduced access to the children.
Worst than that the mother may feed them a bunch of lies so he never sees them again (I have a colleague in this situation who doesn't see some of his children or grandchildren and may never see them).
Best case he needs to deal with all the childcare and bills himself which would be difficult.
Childless couple then I'd agree 100%, if you can't resolve fundamental issues then split up, unfortunately it's not so easy when there are children and a "toxic" mother.I realise the implications.ETA:- the above poster is now on ignoreStriving to clear the mortgage before it finishes in Dec 2028 - amount currently owed - £18,886.270 -
The last time I fried eggs they never spoke again; glad to know these ones recovered.Abbafan1972 said:The part where he fried some eggs by mistake and they didn’t speak for a week. That would suit me fine.2 -
Yes, they could get legal advice.Emmia said:
But I don't think the OP has sought legal advice on their options. It is possible that he would be awarded custody, rather than the mother... and/or depending on the age of the children they may choose not to live with her.lisyloo said:
Then you still haven't taken fully on board what we agreed earlier.Abbafan1972 said:I can’t believe the OP is still with this person.
The consequences that the OP has to consider is that he may get reduced access to the children.
Worst than that the mother may feed them a bunch of lies so he never sees them again (I have a colleague in this situation who doesn't see some of his children or grandchildren and may never see them).
Best case he needs to deal with all the childcare and bills himself which would be difficult.
Childless couple then I'd agree 100%, if you can't resolve fundamental issues then split up, unfortunately it's not so easy when there are children and a "toxic" mother.
The restrictions placed by her religion on activity, cooking, seeing family/friends etc. affect them too.
I may have missed a few bits from what I'd seen the situation had improved.
If it has got to an impasse then yes that's a good idea.0 -
Not a great idea not to listen to contrary opinions (that what I come for but then I consider myself open minded to alternate views).Abbafan1972 said:
No need to lecture me - I’m not the OP.lisyloo said:
Then you still haven't taken fully on board what we agreed earlier.Abbafan1972 said:I can’t believe the OP is still with this person.
The consequences that the OP has to consider is that he may get reduced access to the children.
Worst than that the mother may feed them a bunch of lies so he never sees them again (I have a colleague in this situation who doesn't see some of his children or grandchildren and may never see them).
Best case he needs to deal with all the childcare and bills himself which would be difficult.
Childless couple then I'd agree 100%, if you can't resolve fundamental issues then split up, unfortunately it's not so easy when there are children and a "toxic" mother.I realise the implications.ETA:- the above poster is now on ignore
But great for someone to admit they aren't listening to others.
I had actually agreed with Abbafan1972 that the system was unfair but it had to be considered.0 -
nothing from the OP yet?Striving to clear the mortgage before it finishes in Dec 2028 - amount currently owed - £18,886.270
-
I just think she feel she needs to give her mum money out of principle. I said no to the car thing and this is just a way round it I feel. Typically, she doesn't follow the trends of her family at all. It's a nice gesture, but only if you can afford it.Sea_Shell said:Deleted_User said:
The church bit is called a tithe. With the money to the parent, last year the siblings all banded together to buy the mum a fancy Audi SUV on a finance deal. My wife ran the idea by me which I shut down straight away (I would be surprised if the mum did 500 miles a year in that thing). I think the extra she gives her is a way to cover that.pollypenny said:Sorry, it just sounds far-fetched to me. Why would anyone give £300 to a church and £200 to a parent then have to take money from savings.
I mean, I would love to give my mum money each month, but understand I am not in a financial position to do so.
I've spoken to the wife and we're putting the money back into the children's account and expanded the budget for shopping and petrol so I don't go into my own pocket to fund these when the budget goes low. Will see how things are in a few weeks and whether she dips into savings if she can't fund the £150c she has after giving the other money away.
Is your wife trying to "keep up with the Jones'" as far as her siblings are concerned?
Why does she feel she needs to contribute?0 -
Absolutely not. The !!!!!! storm that would bring.... With this tithe, it's something she'll do regardless. Whether it's to the church of a random person on the street.silvercar said:Is the religion aware? Most genuine religions would assist families in difficulty. Maybe they don’t know your circumstances. Could you speak to them directly?0 -
We were close to divorce not too long ago, but even then would have seen us live together for the sake of the kids. I've worked hard for this house and no way I'm giving it up or half of it away.Emmia said:
But I don't think the OP has sought legal advice on their options. It is possible that he would be awarded custody, rather than the mother... and/or depending on the age of the children they may choose not to live with her.lisyloo said:
Then you still haven't taken fully on board what we agreed earlier.Abbafan1972 said:I can’t believe the OP is still with this person.
The consequences that the OP has to consider is that he may get reduced access to the children.
Worst than that the mother may feed them a bunch of lies so he never sees them again (I have a colleague in this situation who doesn't see some of his children or grandchildren and may never see them).
Best case he needs to deal with all the childcare and bills himself which would be difficult.
Childless couple then I'd agree 100%, if you can't resolve fundamental issues then split up, unfortunately it's not so easy when there are children and a "toxic" mother.
The restrictions placed by her religion on activity, cooking, seeing family/friends etc. affect them too.0 -
Judging by those videos on utube that have already been posted, the response that the church would give, is that the answer would be to give more money.Deleted_User said:
Absolutely not. The !!!!!! storm that would bring.... With this tithe, it's something she'll do regardless. Whether it's to the church of a random person on the street.silvercar said:Is the religion aware? Most genuine religions would assist families in difficulty. Maybe they don’t know your circumstances. Could you speak to them directly?Striving to clear the mortgage before it finishes in Dec 2028 - amount currently owed - £18,886.270 -
Then you have no choice but to put up with the financial situation she has placed/is placing you in.Deleted_User said:
We were close to divorce not too long ago, but even then would have seen us live together for the sake of the kids. I've worked hard for this house and no way I'm giving it up or half of it away.Emmia said:
But I don't think the OP has sought legal advice on their options. It is possible that he would be awarded custody, rather than the mother... and/or depending on the age of the children they may choose not to live with her.lisyloo said:
Then you still haven't taken fully on board what we agreed earlier.Abbafan1972 said:I can’t believe the OP is still with this person.
The consequences that the OP has to consider is that he may get reduced access to the children.
Worst than that the mother may feed them a bunch of lies so he never sees them again (I have a colleague in this situation who doesn't see some of his children or grandchildren and may never see them).
Best case he needs to deal with all the childcare and bills himself which would be difficult.
Childless couple then I'd agree 100%, if you can't resolve fundamental issues then split up, unfortunately it's not so easy when there are children and a "toxic" mother.
The restrictions placed by her religion on activity, cooking, seeing family/friends etc. affect them too.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
