*ANOTHER WIN!* LBC PCM(UK) LTD - MCOL AOS DQ completed/sent/email receipt confirmation

DeltaH3937

Consideration in regards to the contract ..?

Coupon-mad

Yep, the elements of a contract are absent.

They offered you nothing of value because you already paid for and enjoyed an unfettered right to park, offered by the landowner.

They can't offer you something you already have and pretend it has value to you.

No consideration = no contract.

DeltaH3937

Is there a process of how to begin?
court structure? 

I’m sure there was but I couldn’t find it.
it’s ok if not, I’ll speak to an usher on the day and early on.

Coupon-mad

Court cases are actually exhilarating and (I find) fun, but give yourself plenty of time to go to the loo and read your notes/get water once in the waiting room.

And remember to allow time to park, get through security (like an Airport) and to sign in with the Usher.

DO NOT agree to chat with the other side's rep (if one turns up and trues to introduce themselves).

No agreeing to pop into a side room and no agreeing to take any papers they might try to hand you in the waiting area. Tell them you will say everything you want to say, to the Judge.

Think of it like a job interview, a formal meeting, that's all. Judges are usually lovely.  The Claimant's rep gets to speak first.  Then it will be your turn.

Don't forget to ask for your wasted costs (time off work?) at the end if you win.  Good luck!

DeltaH3937

Thank you very much
I’ll try and enjoy haha …

DeltaH3937

Here already, early and courts are running behind.
usher already asking if anyone would like to settle. no movement from anyone haha

DeltaH3937

DeltaH3937 said:

Here already, early and courts are running behind.
usher already asking if anyone would like to settle. no movement from anyone haha

Claimant did not appear haha.
judge dismissed and offers the maximum only loss of earnings of £95 is all.

No research, prep, stationery or travel costs. £95 only.
but it’s a win team!!! 

DeltaH3937

Won purely on the basis of the tenancy agreement / lease does not stipulate the requirement to display.
Foolishly, the claimant also provided this document where by this stipulated the same as my witness statement so they made it a loss for themselves. So on that basis, judge dismissed.

Fruitcake

That's brilliant news. Well done.

B789

Congratulation on your win. Another scammer losing their court fees, £95 and all their other associated costs. We can but hope they did pay a rent-by-the-hour paralegal who was stuck in traffic somewhere too. 

Look back to 8 months ago when you started this thread and how close you came to screwing it up with wrong deadlines. Hopefully you can look back on this experience and everything you learned about the court process and point other victims to this forum.