Fined from Premier parking logistics

Coupon-mad

"3B) - IAS adr@theias.org"

Not them - absolutely no point.

MazUK

Is this ok for SAR request:

[The date]

[Name and address of the organisation]

Dear Sir or Madam

Subject access request ( Data Protection Act 2018 / General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) )

[Your full name and address, any previous address/names and any other details to help identify you and the data you want.]

Please supply the data about me that I am entitled to under data protection law relating to myself.

Please also supply the below data:
- ALL photos and videos taken
- all letters and emails sent and received, including any appeal correspondence earlier
- all data held, all evidence that your business will rely on, and a full copy of the PCN
- and a list of all PCNs outstanding against me and/or this VRN, and do remember that any claim must be for all PCNs, not several separate claims.

If you need any more data from me to confirm my identity please let me know as soon as possible. It may be helpful for you to know that data protection law requires you to respond to a request for data within one calendar month.

If you do not normally deal with these requests, please pass this letter to your Data Protection Officer, or relevant staff member. If you need advice on dealing with this request, the Information Commissioner’s Office can assist you. Its website is ico.org.uk or it can be contacted on 0303 123 1113.

Yours faithfully

[Signature]

MazUK

Is this ok for reply to solicitors solicitors:

Dear Sir/Madam,

In reference to your letter before claim dated

(a) I am seeking debt advice but I deny any debt and the case must be put 'on hold' for not less than 30 days under the PAP for debt claims 2017 from your reply to me.
(b) I have sent your client a SAR
(c) I can confirm my address is

Yours,

MazUK

1505grandad said:

"Have you considered writing to the CEO of HSBC."

I also copy in a few members of the relevant Board.

Should i cc in the board members? Is that a good or bad idea?

KeithP

I would leave out this sentence in your SAR...
If you need any more data from me to confirm my identity please let me know as soon as possible.

Why give the parking company an excuse to delay things?

MazUK

KeithP said:

I would leave out this sentence in your SAR...
If you need any more data from me to confirm my identity please let me know as soon as possible.

Why give the parking company an excuse to delay things?

I copied the wording from the link in the newbies thread - but great call if i can exclude that. Thank you.

MazUK

For 3B the wording for complaint to them:

Dear Sir/Madam,

I would like to complain regarding the conduct of Parking Premier Logistics in issuing a PCN and failing to cancel the said PCN.

The parking enforcement officer had parked a very large transit van sideways covering 4-5 bays or more and the signage was behind this van.
The question was directly asked to the 'man in the van' (the parking enforcement officer) regarding the carpark and was addressed at the time. The "man in the van" replied that he cant help the driver. To NOT answer truthfully has to be a deliberate attempt to deceive the driver
There was immediate ticketing, within seconds as shown from the driver's Dashcam
The signage is not clear.
The signage is small.
The markings are faded.
There are random signs which creates "noise".
The driver is deemed to be HSBC staff as they have retained certain staff benefits.
The first two spaces are blank and seem like parking for customers, and the third space looks like the start of the HSBC spaces. This is confusing.

The above are violations of the code of conduct and unethical business practices, and the driver is a staff member.
For these reasons if this matter is taken to court the judge will see plainly what has happened and will, due to multiple failures of the PCN issuer, find in favour of the driver. As well as this, calculations will be made for the many hours of research and other charges that will be presented to the judge for the PCN issuer to pay.

Please cancel this PCN that is quite clearly not going to stand up to any scrutiny in a court of law.

Yours,
 

Snakes_Belly

"The driver has HSBC Staff benefits." 

I don't work for HSBC anymore but I would class myself as having staff benefits. I would not expand on it. 

MazUK

Snakes_Belly said:

"The driver has HSBC Staff benefits." 

I don't work for HSBC anymore but I would class myself as having staff benefits. I would not expand on it. 

Should i still describe as "the driver". ie:

The driver doesn't don't work for HSBC anymore but would class them-self as having staff benefits

Snakes_Belly

I would just say

"The driver has HSBC Staff benefits." 

I would not expand on it to PPL, their agents or the IPC.