We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Gateway House Piccadilly, Manchester
Options
Comments
-
Received this through from UKCPS this morning.1
-
File it away , nothing is relevant until either an LBC or a court claim3
-
My MP has written to UKCPS regarding this which is good but by the wording of their correspondence has indicated who the driver was. Their office is awaiting a response from them now.0
-
Received this today. As per my previous post, my concern is that my MP'S letter has been worded as such indicating that I was driving.
0 -
Apart from the title, that letter is almost word for word the same as the letter you showed us on 9th February.
The only difference that I can see is that the balance due is now £130.00 - previously £100.00.
There seems to be no explanation of where that £30.00 comes from.
How strange.
Suggest you file that letter as you did the previous one.2 -
zand said:My MP has written to UKCPS regarding this which is good but by the wording of their correspondence has indicated who the driver was. Their office is awaiting a response from them now.
Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street2 -
My MP's office received this today so looks like they're correspondence will have no effect. They also provided several images of the site. Would it be worthwhile putting them on this thread?
0 -
A contract cannot bind you for something that is forbidden - simple contract law. They are barking up the tree trying to frighten you down. Stay there, they won't go any further, other than possibly silly debt collector letters.Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street3 -
Received this a few days ago but not in sufficient time to respond to same. So far they have been very persistent with communications so far so I take it that's the norm. Also, further charges have been added for no apparent reason. A bit concerned re. the access to mortgage etc threat. Is it a consideration to contact my MP to see if they can re-visit contacting UKCPS to enquire if some form of middle ground can be reached as they initially rejected writing off the fine in the last correspondence.
0 -
This is the other part of the letter.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards