We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Employer forcing into office
Comments
-
Employees leave organisations all the time. Employers will put the needs of the business first.[DELETED USER] said:SpiderLegs said:
Employers will make judgements based on their own business models. Permanent WFH for many is a pipe dream. Very few employees are irreplaceable, especially those occupying generic, white collar roles.[DELETED USER] said:Thrugelmir said:
Many variables to be considered from both the employees and employers perspective. Not least that many people cannot be trusted to work unsupervised.[DELETED USER] said:Going forward WFH will be a major benefit and employers that don't offer it will be at a disadvantage. They need to think carefully about the offer they make to employees if they want to retain them.
Employers who take that attitude will be losing a lot of good staff. Being told you can't work from home because the boss doesn't trust you to work is a pretty clear message.
Of course some people will want to come to the office, which is fine. Many will want to do a hybrid of both.
If employers want to avoid the disruption of taking on new people, losing all that knowledge and experience of how their business works, those established working relationships, they need to consider employee work/life balance and conditions.1 -
delete 123
E
delete 1230 -
I’m more miffed that I want to be able to call in my office and my employer won’t let me.It’s no fun doing video conferences from your car when you’re bosting for a wee.
All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.
Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.0 -
Trust has to be earnt first. Not demanded as a right.[DELETED USER] said:Thrugelmir said:
Employees leave organisations all the time. Employers will put the needs of the business first.[DELETED USER] said:SpiderLegs said:
Employers will make judgements based on their own business models. Permanent WFH for many is a pipe dream. Very few employees are irreplaceable, especially those occupying generic, white collar roles.[DELETED USER] said:Thrugelmir said:
Many variables to be considered from both the employees and employers perspective. Not least that many people cannot be trusted to work unsupervised.[DELETED USER] said:Going forward WFH will be a major benefit and employers that don't offer it will be at a disadvantage. They need to think carefully about the offer they make to employees if they want to retain them.
Employers who take that attitude will be losing a lot of good staff. Being told you can't work from home because the boss doesn't trust you to work is a pretty clear message.
Of course some people will want to come to the office, which is fine. Many will want to do a hybrid of both.
If employers want to avoid the disruption of taking on new people, losing all that knowledge and experience of how their business works, those established working relationships, they need to consider employee work/life balance and conditions.
Exactly. Disruption, and with smaller companies or difficult to recruit skills, the loss of valuable knowledge and delays to projects.
Employment should be a two way street, and being flexible will encourage employees to stay.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
