We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
BITCOIN
Comments
-
bugbyte_2 said:
You call Bitcoin an Asset, but to be an asset it must therefore have something supporting its price other than sentiment.
0 -
aaj123 said:bugbyte_2 said:
You call Bitcoin an Asset, but to be an asset it must therefore have something supporting its price other than sentiment.Decentralisation: No government or central authority controls it. This gives Bitcoin a level of autonomy that many people believe will make it more resistant to inflation and economic crises.
Limited Supply: There is a finite amount of Bitcoin that can be mined (21 million), which means that it is scarce and many believe it will hold its value better than fiat currencies, that can be printed at will. The number of new participants and active addresses climbs every day also.
Global Reach: Bitcoin can be sent and received anywhere in the world. This makes it an attractive alternative for people who need to transfer money across borders for next to no fees.
Security: The blockchain that underpins Bitcoin is extremely secure, virtually impossible to hack or counterfeit.
Accessibility: Bitcoin can be bought and sold easily online, and it is increasingly being accepted as a form of payment by merchants around the world.
Low Transaction Fees: Bitcoin transactions are typically cheaper than traditional payment methods, which make it more attractive to people who want to avoid high fees...
Increasing Acceptance: Bitcoin is becoming more widely accepted by businesses and institutions around the world, which will increase its legitimacy as a form of payment and store of value.
Store of Value: Some people see Bitcoin as a digital gold, a store of value that can hedge against inflation and economic instability... like what we are seeing now with some Banks failing... again
Innovation: The technology behind Bitcoin is constantly evolving, with new features and improvements being added to the blockchain. This could make it more attractive to investors who want to invest in cutting-edge technology. Look at what Jack Dorsey is up to now...
Financial Freedom: Bitcoin offers users a level of financial freedom and privacy that is not available with traditional banking systems. This could make it more attractive to people who want to avoid government surveillance or control over their finances.
"Wealth consists not in having great possessions, but in having few wants."1 -
DannyCarey said:Here are 10 somethings for you @bugbyte_2...
Save for a few marginal cases in developing countries, the only thing people use bitcoin for (and far fewer since the bubble popped) is for speculation.
No-one outside of bubbles like these is talking about it, no-one in the UK is thinking it's the future of money.
No-one thinks "ooh I'll use Bitcoin for that money transfer abroad, that'll be cheap/faster"
No-one thinks " Oooh, bitcoin, that's how I can keep my money safe" - quite the opposite!
And so on, for each of these points.1 -
You sure like to speak on behalf of everyone, don't you? Must be nice to know what's inside everyone's head..."Wealth consists not in having great possessions, but in having few wants."1
-
DannyCarey said:You sure like to speak on behalf of everyone, don't you? Must be nice to know what's inside everyone's head...
But I'm not exactly taking liberties here - it's not just my opinion that people in the UK aren't buying groceries with bitcoin or aren't sending money abroad in any numbers that are meaningful.
An overwhelming % of us are using Visa/Mastercard/Amex/Cash for spending and using their bank/FX providers/3rd party txfer sites/Wise/Revolut etc for money transfers. You know this, it's not something you can have your own personal truth on.
Whether Bitcoin could evolve to be more useful is open to debate. My understanding (tell me if I'm wrong) is that the people who can change things are reluctant to do so for various reasons.1 -
Frequentlyhere said:
Money is not just stuff one spends or prefers to spend, its also what one prefers to use for storing wealth.0 -
DannyCarey said:aaj123 said:bugbyte_2 said:
You call Bitcoin an Asset, but to be an asset it must therefore have something supporting its price other than sentiment.Decentralisation: No government or central authority controls it. This gives Bitcoin a level of autonomy that many people believe will make it more resistant to inflation and economic crises.
Limited Supply: There is a finite amount of Bitcoin that can be mined (21 million), which means that it is scarce and many believe it will hold its value better than fiat currencies, that can be printed at will. The number of new participants and active addresses climbs every day also.
Global Reach: Bitcoin can be sent and received anywhere in the world. This makes it an attractive alternative for people who need to transfer money across borders for next to no fees.
Security: The blockchain that underpins Bitcoin is extremely secure, virtually impossible to hack or counterfeit.
Accessibility: Bitcoin can be bought and sold easily online, and it is increasingly being accepted as a form of payment by merchants around the world.
Low Transaction Fees: Bitcoin transactions are typically cheaper than traditional payment methods, which make it more attractive to people who want to avoid high fees...
Increasing Acceptance: Bitcoin is becoming more widely accepted by businesses and institutions around the world, which will increase its legitimacy as a form of payment and store of value.
Store of Value: Some people see Bitcoin as a digital gold, a store of value that can hedge against inflation and economic instability... like what we are seeing now with some Banks failing... again
Innovation: The technology behind Bitcoin is constantly evolving, with new features and improvements being added to the blockchain. This could make it more attractive to investors who want to invest in cutting-edge technology. Look at what Jack Dorsey is up to now...
Financial Freedom: Bitcoin offers users a level of financial freedom and privacy that is not available with traditional banking systems. This could make it more attractive to people who want to avoid government surveillance or control over their finances.
To answer some of those points....
1) Central management of currency is essential for a nation state to manage its own economy.
2) Very limited supply is a problem if you want an economy to grow and invest for the future, and the standard of living to increase. Research the Gold Standard in the 1930s. Deflation is a far more serious problem than inflation.
7) I will believe that Bitcoin is becoming more accepted when my local Tesco takes it.
8) Has Bitcoin provided a hedge against inflation and instability in the past few years?
9) I am not sure I want my stored value to be a technology test-bed. It should be simple. That does not prevent technology and innovation in the use of the currency. Consider what has happened without Bitcoin in the past 50 years.
10) That is why it is attractive to those stealing money from the rest of us by crime and tax evasion. I want governments to be able to prevent this. AIUI bitcoin makes it much more difficult.
Will we need more than one "bitcoin"? Are you proposing a world where any person, company, or country can create a new currency? If so you will need to duplicate the current trading currency infrastructure with exchange rates continuously changing and vast quantities of money being moved from one to currency to another. Wuuld the situation be any different than currently? If you are not proposing that who will police the system across the world to ensure there is only one "true" bitcoin?
1 -
aaj123 said:Bitcoin doesn't need to be used for this nature of daily spending in order to be valuable. Its a wealth asset not a spending one.
I'm actually less firm/technical in my view than bugbyte as to what can consitute an asset. Sentiment moves a lot of things beyond fundamentals. When a fine art painting valuation doubles from sale to sale, did it fundamentally become twice as attractive?
If for the sake of argument we say yes Bitcoin is a wealth asset, then ok, but in my opinion it's a poor risk-adjusted investment because it has so few positives about it.
If I had to make a good faith case for investing in it, the only thing I can really see is that it's the focus of much speculation and so potentially could recapture people's imaginations and boost up in value for a short term trade. If I squint really hard perhaps I could imagine the bitcoin community improving the code further to expand use cases for it.
On the other side though:
- As discussed, there's nothing productive there. It's not generating cash/yield in any form.
- The utility of the thing is very low, it's not practical to use mostly, and people prefer to hold it for appreciation as you've said. So there's no reason for people to hold it unless they want to play the speculation game.
- It has been tainted by the perception of scams/lack of security that crypto entails - rightly or wrongly, it's tainted.
- It's had several rounds of speculation already and as above, it has something of a reputation now. Does it have enough traction to sustain another significant round?
- It's a manipulated market currently, part of the reason a bitcoin spot ETF keeps beng denied.
- Regulation is making it far more difficult for people to speculate on it, even if they want to. If we're dependent on speculation for appreciation, that's a problem.
- Holding it safely is, if not impossible, then not straightforward - learning curve. To be honest, you can mock, but if I thought the upsides outweighed all the rest of the downsides, I'd still probably be too scared of doing something wrong to drop £100k in it.
Would you disagree with any of the above?
1 -
- Holding it safely is, if not impossible, then not straightforward - learning curve. To be honest, you can mock, but if I thought the upsides outweighed all the rest of the downsides, I'd still probably be too scared of doing something wrong to drop £100k in it.
Would you disagree with any of the above?0 -
aaj123 said:- Holding it safely is, if not impossible, then not straightforward - learning curve. To be honest, you can mock, but if I thought the upsides outweighed all the rest of the downsides, I'd still probably be too scared of doing something wrong to drop £100k in it.
Would you disagree with any of the above?
All I meant was that to treat it as an investment it probably has to be a reasonably substantial sum to be worth doing. Perhaps £100k is unnecessarily high. Let's call it the S+S ISA limit of £20k. I'd still be very wary personally about safely storing that amount of BTC, unless it was in the form of the long sought after BTC ETF.
(ignoring the point that to me it would seem somewhat ironic to be investing in bitcoin via a financially regulated ETF under the purview of the monetary authorities)0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards