Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Will Brexit happen?

16364666869167

Comments

  • Fran_Klee
    Fran_Klee Posts: 409 Forumite
    100 Posts Name Dropper
    Arklight wrote: »
    A suitable complement to the ADVISORY referendum, then.

    That'll be the one where MP's agreed to implement the result would it?
    :wall:
  • Moby
    Moby Posts: 3,917 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    It's odd how those so keen to point out that the referendum was technically only "advisory" are less keen to admit that the various motions passed in the Commons against a no deal Brexit were also only "advisory".
    The point is we are a parliamentary based democracy. Always have been and we have representative Govmt who work with a parliament. If you want direct Govmt by referendum, get rid of parliament and vote in a dictatorship.
  • Moby wrote: »
    The point is we are a parliamentary based democracy.

    So you agree that parliament should respect the democratic will of the people, and that if it does not, the principle of a "parliamentary based democracy" is void?
  • lvader
    lvader Posts: 2,579 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    It's odd how those so keen to point out that the referendum was technically only "advisory" are less keen to admit that the various motions passed in the Commons against a no deal Brexit were also only "advisory".

    There were other votes that didn’t have the advisory remark, they all got voted down.
  • LHW99
    LHW99 Posts: 5,277 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    The point is we are a parliamentary based democracy. Always have been and we have representative Govmt who work with a parliament.
    Fine, but my MP wants to remain, whereas the constituency voted leave - that's not representing the constituency.
    The Government is trying to represent the country - which voted leave - but a proportion of Parliament seems determined to prevent it - they wouldn't vote for the negotiated deal and haven't (yet) agreed on anything else.
  • Moby
    Moby Posts: 3,917 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    So you agree that parliament should respect the democratic will of the people, and that if it does not, the principle of a "parliamentary based democracy" is void?

    Who decides what's 'void' ?
  • Moby wrote: »
    Who decides what's 'void' ?

    In a democracy? The Demos.
  • Moby
    Moby Posts: 3,917 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    LHW99 wrote: »
    Fine, but my MP wants to remain, whereas the constituency voted leave - that's not representing the constituency.
    The Government is trying to represent the country - which voted leave - but a proportion of Parliament seems determined to prevent it - they wouldn't vote for the negotiated deal and haven't (yet) agreed on anything else.

    The problem is the 'referendum' type of democratic process doesn't fit a parliamentary system....for the very reason you are giving. You either vote for an MP to make decisions or you have direct referendums. IMO referendums are a poor form of democracy because they reduce complicated questions to a binary choice.
  • Arklight
    Arklight Posts: 3,182 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts
    Fran_Klee wrote: »
    That'll be the one where MP's agreed to implement the result would it?
    :wall:

    In which case you won't mind them remaining in parliament doing their jobs for the full term this year, without some dodgy Tory dictator almost no one in the country has voted for, proroguing parliament then, will you?
  • Arklight wrote: »
    In which case you won't mind them remaining in parliament doing their jobs for the full term this year, without some dodgy Tory dictator almost no one in the country has voted for, proroguing parliament then, will you?

    They're not doing their jobs. Their job is to respect the referendum. They are trying to frustrate it.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.