We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
large booking at restaurant- how to split the bill?
Comments
-
Gosh I didn't read that into the posts at all.
I took it as fingers burnt with a few free loaders & chancers.
I'm afraid I read it the same as missbiggles, (and mentioned it in my posts ), but became aware that I might have misunderstood. The emotive language didn't help.
I have ASD tendencies myself, so do misunderstand sometimes(AKA HRH_MUngo)
Member #10 of £2 savers club
Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology: Terry Eagleton0 -
I also read it the same way. In fact I think you did say you were not a "people person" cba to check, but I think you did. We are what we are, but what we are affects how we see the world and how we judge others, that is inevitable.0
-
-
-
-
Georgiegirl256 wrote: »That's how I read it too.
Also, I think someone who wasn't a people person, wouldn't even go out and try and socialise.
http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showpost.php?p=70516852&postcount=13560 -
Andypandyboy wrote: »
What I read from the comments from PN in those posts in that link is that she likes going out with people she chooses to go out with, but can't help it if she doesn't like the company of the people they bring with them that she didn't expect to be there, and that she finds it tedious, (communicating with those other people,) but she does try to make an effort.
Funny how people read into things in different ways.You didn't, did you? :rotfl::rotfl:0 -
PasturesNew wrote: »Well, it's not me, by that I mean that I upset people without knowing. No clue whatsoever. It's not that I don't do people; it's that people don't do me.
With respect, that doesn't mean it is not you, it means you are unaware of it, not that it is not you. It is a perspective, but not the only perspective.
0 -
Andypandyboy wrote: »
Well, I think it's great that she goes out and tries in the first place.
Anyhow, enough of people trying to pick holes in people's characters. (Not just you, I mean everybody)0 -
Georgiegirl256 wrote: »Well, I think it's great that she goes out and tries in the first place.
Anyhow, enough of people trying to pick holes in people's characters. (Not just you, I mean everybody)
I agree Georgie.
I think this thread should be left to drop down the board now.
The upshot is that people should be allowed to be what they want to be, without being judged.You didn't, did you? :rotfl::rotfl:0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards