Revenge !!!!!! - have you experienced it or have your children?

j.e.j.

Peter333 wrote: »

Seriously, I've heard it all now. :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

Can you actually HEAR yourself?

"What do YOU old farts know anyway? It's perfectly NORMAL for us to take pics of our boobs and bums and give them to a boy we have known for five minutes, because we LOVE him and TRUST him so much. But I will cry like a baby and act the victim when he shares the pics all over the internet!" OMG, it's almost too painful to read! :rotfl:

I can't help but agree with this ^^

If you allow naked pictures of yourself to end up in cyberspace you are consciously making a decision about your own safety, not to mention dignity!

If he took the photo without your permission that's slightly different, but to knowingly take a nude picture of yourself and send it to someone you are taking that risk.

lostinrates wrote: »

Not that I know of. :rotfl:

They are my drs and consultants.

I'm intrigued, I have never in my life emailed pictures of intimate parts to a doctor or consultant!! Nor would I consent to one being taken, even in the hospital. Not because I don't trust the doctor, but there's too much risk it'll end up on the net or the IT system will get hacked in to.

lostinrates

dandelionclock30 wrote: »

I personally dont see how a nude photo is expressing love, even if the person works away. I think its naff .
Long term relationships are not immune to break up and basically nude photos are just blackmail material there to be used.

A huge amount people do in their private lives is not for me, but I think people have the right to do it and feel safe if its lawful and consentual.

lostinrates

j.e.j. wrote: »

I'm intrigued, I have never in my life emailed pictures of intimate parts to a doctor or consultant!! Nor would I consent to one being taken, even in the hospital. Not because I don't trust the doctor, but there's too much risk it'll end up on the net or the IT system will get hacked in to.

If I were in hospital they could see the situation. ( changed word from 'issue' for an obvious reason of risk of miscommunication) , and I would consent to pictures so other consultants at other hospitals could see too. My hospitals are all some way from home, my drs are trying to make life easier for me . It would probably freak you out even more to say I have some of their mobiles too and am urged to text them if I need them. It must be all the smut pics :rotfl:

Fluff15

It's kind of odd that some people in this thread has automatically assumed that the 'stupid for doing it' people are all girls, and that they would be disappointed in their daughters for doing it. Yet I have received many penis pictures (I have never ever asked for them) and I wonder if people would act with such vitriol against the young men who sent them to me? Would the effect be as devastating on them if I were to send these photos around as it is to women?

I also agree that no, things haven't changed since Thorsoak's age. People were still taking nudes then. Hell, people have been painting and sculpting the naked form for thousands of years. The difference is in the speed it is spread. Should we stop taking nudes because the spread of information is faster now?

Many people on this thread are saying 'don't take nudes even with people you trust such as your husband because it can be used against you', were also on another thread saying that it was out of order for somebody's husband to be thinking about protecting their inheritance if the marriage were ever to dissolve. Marriage is for sharing, so why not send nudes to the one you love?

System

maybe I ought to change my name to Jezebel :D:D

supersaver2

Never sent or received these kind of pictures but common sense tells me if you feel the need to share these pictures just don't include your face so you can't be identified even if the picture does make it online!

adouglasmhor

supersaver2 wrote: »

Never sent or received these kind of pictures but common sense tells me if you feel the need to share these pictures just don't include your face so you can't be identified even if the picture does make it online!

I was identified in a magazine shoot from my Tattoos, to be fair I know I was going to be in the shoot, there was no full frontal and my face was pixelated. Someone I knew recognised me from the tattoos them dropped himelf in it when in front of his wife and my GF he asked if it was me and I asked him why he was looking at pictures of a naked bloke. So your face is not the only identifying feature.

fairy_lights

Judi wrote: »

Actually, the majority of the pictures ive taken and sent, I'm rather proud of. If I didn't like them, then I wouldn't have sent them. Ok I wouldn't want my kids to see them but what goes on in the sex lives of their parents has nothing to do with them. As long as we have taken steps to ensure they never see them then so be it.

In the early days of hubby working away I'd start sending them on Wednesday and get my rewards on Friday.

If my children had half the sex life I have had, I'd be damned pleased for them..... but lets not go there.:rotfl:

God I so want to change my user name! :mad:

Good for you Judi! I think your post shows how contrary to what many people on this thread seem to think, nude photos can be part of a healthy relationship.

System

even the clothes you wear (if your wearing underwear) or background drops can identify you.

Tropez

Georgiegirl256 wrote: »

I do agree with you that it is a truely awful crime, and to do that to another human being is disgusting, it makes my skin crawl that one human being could do such a thing to another human being, it really does. Like you say, it can destroy lives.

But as Buzzybee has pointed out, young girl after young girl (and maybe some not so young) has done it just so they can 'fit in with the crowd'. I still wouldn't call it the norm, but it's a sad reflection on society today.

Maybe blame is a strong word to use regarding the victim? But there's no denying IMO that people should be accountable for their own actions. If you send nude photos in the first place, no matter how much you trust that person at the time, trust can be broken and you should know that those photos which were once for their eyes only could now be up for view to god knows how many other people. If you find that idea horrifying(which I do) then don't do it in the first place.

But again, what type of accountability are you talking about?

I, once, had nude pictures of my wife. She was in New Zealand for a year. Given that we're quite sexually adventurous anyway it wasn't a big deal. I mean, have you tried conducting a relationship with a what is it, 10/11 hour time difference? It's not easy and going from sex every day to never is actually a major adjustment, so we did a few things to keep the lust aspect of our relationship up.

My wife had nude pictures of me in return. I trust my wife with my life. Now I don't know whether she still has any of those pictures, frankly I don't care. If I can't trust my wife that should we split up, she won't seek to humiliate me by posting them online then frankly I might as well be dead because life is utterly pointless and joyless if you can't trust anyone.

But sometimes people do trust the wrong people. People who have been married have had this done to them at the end of their marriage. I know it'd ludicrous in this day and age to think marriage is forever but show me a couple who got married thinking it wasn't? (excluding those who get married for residence permits and whatnot)

Sorry, but it is nonsense that "don't take the picture in the first place" should be the appropriate response here, because you might as well go one better and say don't bother trusting anyone because there's a possibility they might be a complete a-hole.

And I'm sorry, but I see some of the worst our society has to offer on an almost daily basis. I don't need to go through life thinking I can't even trust the woman who I married as well.