We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
parking eye prosecuting an 89 yr old who didn't need a parking ticket
Comments
-
these people may be able to point you in the right direction.. http://www.monitor.gov.uk/
also http://www.cqc.org.uk/
It would appear that this chaps care has been compromised by yhe systems put in place by the health care providers.Illegitimi non carborundum:)0 -
It would be satisfying if this case were not simply dropped like a hot potato by PE but if they could be brought to book over it in some way.
Naturally the main concern for the OP and all on here is the removal of any further stress to the target of PE's flimflammery.cheers
Les0 -
It would be satisfying if this case were not simply dropped like a hot potato by PE but if they could be brought to book over it in some way.
In an ideal world whoever it is/was at the walk in centre who contracted the parking company should be held liable for this mess ( if the above is all true) , as well as the employees of the parking company.
People need to realise what they are doing when they allow a PPC to operate on their land. After all the parking company are acting for and on behalf of the car park owner and with their full permission.
As mentioned previously anyone who allows a PPC to operate on their land should know what these companys are and what they get up to, its not as if they are a new phenomenon theres plenty of evidence out there. and if you do let a PPC loose on your land then their ( the PPCs) actions are your responsibility.From the Plain Language Commission:
"The BPA has surely become one of the most socially dangerous organisations in the UK"0 -
Similar from "Fed Up Pete" over on Legal Beagles....
parkingeye - cant believe it!!
My partner and I, along with my 87 year old parents had been out to lunch last Saturday 5th April, upon heading home my partner began to suffer a bad stomach ache, she was not going to make it home. We pulled into a small shopping area of about a dozen shops and a pub, I drove around the entire area, the car park was completely full, I now had to stop somewhere! There were perhaps a dozen empty bays to the side of the buildings, I pulled in and helped my partner quickly to the pub toilets, leaving my parents in the car. We left the area 13 minutes later.
I have now received a parking fine of £60 [£100 after 29days] from ParkingEye, they threaten to "recover any unpaid part of the parking charge". They threaten no legal action, should I pay the charge, I find this so unfare as we stopped only for 13 minutes and for a genuine emergency!!
Can anyone please advise me what to do?
Thanks
Fed Up PeteIllegitimi non carborundum:)0 -
One would have thought PE would have learned their lesson from the laineee case ... obviously not.
Absolutely disgusting!0 -
-
BenefitMaster wrote: »Still considering what to do to PE and The Range for their unlawful conduct in harassing and suing a disabled person when they agreed to cancel the charge.
We could always complain to Disabled Motoring UK . On second thoughts they have sold out to the private parking industry and are a BPA member . In addition, DMUK describes people who post on these forums as "parking terrorists" . So no help there then.What part of "A whop bop-a-lu a whop bam boo" don't you understand?0 -
Ryan_Bryan wrote: »Just remember that we are not meant to call them
Scammers or Scum.
Nor are we supposed to call them;
Cowboys, Deceitful, Conmen, Scumbags, Parasites, Fraudsters or Thieves.We’ve had to remove your signature because your opinion differs from ours. Please check the Forum Rules if you’re unsure why you can not have your own opinion on here and, if still unsure, email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0 -
BenefitMaster wrote: »Still considering what to do to PE and The Range for their unlawful conduct in harassing and suing a disabled person when they agreed to cancel the charge.
I don't suppose the inclusion of the founder of the Range being in the 100 billionaires list would influence you? :-)0 -
Nor are we supposed to call them;
Cowboys, .
I think we are allowed to call them cowboys now.MSE_Martin wrote: »
MoneySavingExpert is 100% committed to taking on unfair private parking tickets and companies behaving inappropriately. This is often a cowboy market with some firms displaying behaviour only suiting the wild west.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards