bag for life?

wealdroam

Money-Saving-King wrote: »

So basically the op is complaining about a bag for life that infact wasn't advertised as a bag for life after all!

I can only assume that you also missed the significant phrase in that link that Earthstorm gave:

The new designer range of Tesco Bags for Life, from 35p each, includes a natty jute version.

Money-Saving-King wrote: »

My gran is 93, she puts this down to party leading...

I hope your gran continues to enjoy her 'party leading'.

Azari

Money-Saving-King wrote: »

So basically the op is complaining about a bag for life that infact wasn't advertised as a bag for life after all!

Did you actually check the link given or did you just wade straight in to belittle the op and try and make him look stupid.

Poetic justice that it turns out you've just made yourself look stupid.

My gran is 93, she puts this down to party leading a happy life and not getting wound up by petty things!

Something she probably learned as a necessity when you arrived on the scene. :rotfl:

(It being ironic that, although you think the topic petty, you still think it worthwhile to join the thread to have a go at another member - even though you have just made yourself look like a plonker for not checking your 'facts'.)

Storck

Azari wrote: »

It's in the link he has already posted.

And it's absolutely current.

My definition of current and yours must differ. I don't count something from over 3 years ago as current.

Money-Saving-King

Azari wrote: »

Did you actually check the link given

My point exactly! Why worry about petty details and bore myself stupid by reading every part of the thread & all links posted!

For a start a bag for life doesn't mean it'll last forever, they replace it if it breaks. The op got that. And that links say Terry Leahy is CEO, he hasn't been since March 2011!

Azari, lighten up

Azari

Money-Saving-King wrote: »

My point exactly! Why worry about petty details and bore myself stupid by reading every part of the thread & all links posted!

And yet, despite not being bothered to read the thread properly you still felt that you needed to make a post to belittle the OP. Making a fool of yourself in the process.

That's really quite sad.

Zedicus

Money-Saving-King wrote: »

My point exactly! Why worry about petty details and bore myself stupid by reading every part of the thread & all links posted!

Ten out of ten for chutzpa! You make an idiot of yourself by trying to put down the op when you are wrong and then try and make out it was deliberate.

I think the expression is, "Nice try but no cigar".

Money-Saving-King

Storck wrote: »

My definition of current and yours must differ. I don't count something from over 3 years ago as current.

Don't worry, that's just Azari making themselves look stupid again!

Money-Saving-King

Zedicus wrote: »

Ten out of ten for chutzpa! You make an idiot of yourself by trying to put down the op when you are wrong and then try and make out it was deliberate.

I think the expression is, "Nice try but no cigar".

You might want to read the last few post of this thread

Storck

arbroath_lass wrote: »

The 5p charge will be for the paper-thin bags that are currently free. I don't think they'll replace them as they are designed to degrade very quickly.

I meant will they still do the replacement ones at 10p still or will that price rise.

arbroath_lass

Storck wrote: »

I meant will they still do the replacement ones at 10p still or will that price rise.

Ahh I see . Knowing Tesco the price will probably rise .