The Mobile Outlet

kltpzyxm

Hi Mira,
Thats very interesting....

Does this supervisors name begin with a J ???
I have a case pending with a defence provided by a supervisor.
If it was the same one, then that would bring into question the credibility of his statement....the word perjury has just popped into my head....

mira

Yes, that name starts with a J.

I wish that my friend has showed me her paperwork earlier.

Now I think that supervisor may pack his bags and travel away from the UK if he reads this :rotfl:

kltpzyxm

mira wrote: »

Yes, that name starts with a J.

I wish that my friend has showed me her paperwork earlier.

Now I think that supervisor may pack his bags and travel away from the UK if he reads this :rotfl:

With a bit of luck, He will be packing his bags, then unpacking them in one of Her Majesty's holiday camps....@ Durham, or Holme House or Belmarsh...if you get my drift...

adgupta

Hi,

I sent my Claimant's Reply (intention to continue the claim) to the Riverdale House address by recorded post - and the Royal Mail's website says

" We have tried to deliver your item from our BRADFORD NORTH Delivery Office before 12:16 on 08/02/08 and we have left a while you were out card."

Does that mean the redirection is no longer working?

I am about to send my last cashback claim, and wondering which address should I use!! It probably does not matter a lot under the present situation, still any advise is welcome!!

kltpzyxm

adgupta,
you have answered your own question. The redirection must no longer be in place.....
I sent my claimants reply to the Riverdale House address and to the Bantams Business Park address and a copy via email to a supervisor whose name begins with J (see mira's previous posts) Just waiting for the docs to arrive from Northampton to proceed....

rob_quill

Hi.

I don't think you need to worry as I received this message a while ago when sending something recorded, and I believe it arrived (haven't checked since shortly after I sent it) but I have sent things since then by SD (to the same address) and they have arrived no problem. I say give it a week and there will be a signature on the website

Rob

despatchdave

Jas is going to be so popular in the courts!!
It may be of use building up a dossier on the lies this 'supervisor' has told.
I think it would be difficult to use print outs from a forum in court but a few pms should be able to get some witness statements as to Jas' storytelling for when it actually goes to court

mira

yes, you know i feel i have enough energy to get this supervisor into trouble. I have alot of time and would give it as much as it takes just to get this supervisor into trouble because we should ourselves start putting a FULLStop to this ongoing FRAUD.

I have also found another similar evidence against that Supervisor for another claimant I know. But I'd rather discuss this with the court first before revealing this info here.

I wonder if this Supervisor is getting any sleep at night!!!

maplewood2

Its the Directors of the Company you should be targeting - any supervisor or reception operator is simply cannon fodder. The directors are taking your money, the supervisor is just doing what s/he is told. S/he probably doesnt realise exactly what stupid games they are having to play and the seriousness of the consequences.

The supervisor name referred to may be a generic email / user name that they all use, not an actual person - that would fit in with the general cheating and fraudulent philosophy these cowboys operate under. My claim defence was also filled in by this name - and yes there is a blatant lie in the defence which I am very keen to show the judge. I imagine by the time it comes to court this 'person' will suddenly no longer exist.

But still - lying to HM Court Services and committing perjury is not good for them. I think the TV documentary being put together by the folks in the Midlands should shake things up a bit. If there is anyone from the west mids who is having their money stolen by these thieves - please contact the TV company mentioned a few pages back.

mira

Even though the directors of the company come at the top of this list regarding money theft, I do think this Supervisor is responsible too.

I don't think the directors force this supervisor to work for them in this company. If that Supervisor is being told as we expect by the Directors what to do, then he should have resigned voluntarily long time ago and should have reported them. But it seems he has an interest in working for them in the Fraud industry as he may be earning alot for the job he makes. He may be earning a rich salary compared with a lower salary he may get elsewhere in a job that doesn't involve FRAUD.