Anybody else watching this?

FatVonD

Great minds

Cooper18

FatVonD wrote: »

She could have taken the kids away for the weekend and let him set light to the house while they weren't there.

Once she knew it had gone horribly wrong she could have admitted it and spent the last 2 days of her eldest's life sat by his bed instead of trying to save their own skins instead.

I hope she begged for that kids forgiveness too, while she sat there.

Errata

Cooper18 wrote: »

I think Erratta meant AFTER the fire she could've shopped him. But was too busy thinking of her own skin.

Thank you, that's what I meant. She had every opportunity both when she was questioned by the police and after they were arrested to tell the police what had happened, and to plead guilty to her involvement when she was tried. She didn't.
Remember - the children were buried not long after they were killed and the police refused to let her or him attend the funerals. That was another opportunity she had to admit what had happened but she wouldn't even put her children first on the day they were buried.
So much for mother love.

delain

Cooper18 wrote: »

I hope she begged for that kids forgiveness too, while she sat there.

The point is she wasn't there. Had it been my child in hospital on life support (for whatever reason) you'd have to drag me away to get me to leave them.

They were off having threesomes apparently (although I'm not too sure on the timeline iyswim) and he was arguing with nurses about takeaways not being allowed on the ward.

Cooper18

delain wrote: »

The point is she wasn't there. Had it been my child in hospital on life support (for whatever reason) you'd have to drag me away to get me to leave them.

They were off having threesomes apparently and he was arguing with nurses about takeaways not being allowed on the ward.

Seriously?! They weren't there?

God, it gets worse. I'd be there day and night. And yet their lawyers were saying what good parents they were. They have lower standards of parenting than me evidently.

elona

I have reported a post as spam as it might get some attention from the team that way.

I am sick to death of a certain person's vendetta and I only noticed it today :eek:

fluffnutter

I vote we all just simply report it (as spam or otherwise) but don't bother replying or quoting because it just drags interesting threads off into boring tangents about sjc3 and her/his issues.

No point stroking a narcissist's ego. Let's just keep to the topic. The posts get removed eventually and he/she will get PPRd soon enough.

Cooper18

Didn't realise there was a vendetta going on. Thought it was just someone being a bully, which is ironic on this thread really.

Anyone hazard a guess as to what sentence this delightful trio might get for manslaughter? And do you reckon Mick and Mairead will get equal sentences?

marisco_2

Cooper18 wrote: »

Anyone hazard a guess as to what sentence this delightful trio might get for manslaughter? And do you reckon Mick and Mairead will get equal sentences?

It will be interesting to see what sentences they recieve. When is this going to take place? I thought it was mentioned on the news earlier that it would be this afternoon.

Cooper18

marisco wrote: »

It will be interesting to see what sentences they recieve. When is this going to take place? I thought it was mentioned on the news earlier that it would be this afternoon.

Think the judge deferred to tomorrow. Hopefully she's watching the news so she can be extra biased!