Flight delay and cancellation compensation, Jet2.com ONLY

howticklediam

NoviceAngel wrote: »

Which one specifically are you after ?

Langford and Gledhill -v- Jet2, Bradford County Court 27th March, District Judge Nightingale, I have the case number too.

NoviceAngel

I'll see what I can find out and PM you.

JPears

howticklediam wrote: »

http://www.flightdelays.co.uk/blog/2015/1298/update-on-jet2-and-the-2-year-limitation-defence

It is another example of the seeminlgy unfathomable inequities in our messed up legal system, that one DJ throws out Jet2's defense yet the supposed "expert" judges at Liverpool are stricking out claims concerning the 2yr limit.

dino25uk

Folks an update on my case. I won my case back in 2013, but Jet2 were appealing it. The date was set for the appeal, however was postponed pending the EC and 2 year limits etc. I am pleased to announce that Jet2 have now dropped their appeal. Good luck to all you folks who are still chasing their compensation. Don't give up!!!

howticklediam

I do like this forum.

When your defendant sends their witness statements and evidence (court bundle), does anything they said in their original defence document count also. I.e. can the original defence be referred to and used in court as evidence also, or does it need to be sent again with the court bundle?

legal_magpie

I do like simple questions. The answer is "Yes" Their defence is a "statement of case" and can be referred to be either party.
JJ

howticklediam

legal_magpie wrote: »

I do like simple questions. The answer is "Yes" Their defence is a "statement of case" and can be referred to be either party.
JJ

Thanks. Good news!

JPears

Don't tell me, an airline changing their story? Surely not....

howticklediam

My hearing has been vacated. So I wait until the two-year time bar is settled in higher courts and then apply for a judgment I guess. The order doesn't say anything about time limits so I assume it's open ended. Also the defendants still have time to object, presumably they can argue that the case still goes ahead. I don't care either way.

NoviceAngel

howticklediam wrote: »

My hearing has been vacated. So I wait until the two-year time bar is settled in higher courts and then apply for a judgment I guess. The order doesn't say anything about time limits so I assume it's open ended. Also the defendants still have time to object, presumably they can argue that the case still goes ahead. I don't care either way.

The wording 'Vacated' worries me a little does it definitely say just the hearing has been vacated and your case has been 'STAYED' ?

Good result, I know that's what you wanted until outcome of the Gledhill appeal.

Cheers,

NoviceAngel