Flight delay and cancellation compensation, Jet2.com ONLY

Vauban

Or it could be that, actually, it is lawful to introduce restrictive provisions in T&Cs that limit the period under which legal action can be taken to less than the 6 year norm. We need to see a number of these judgements- and the reasoning behind them - before we can be sure where the judicial consensus lies.

Of course it could be a rogue judge - and LIPs definitely seem to come off worse against them than proper lawyers do. Too early to say IMHO ...

Mark2spark

At least this 2 year issue will diminish over time. The main reason that it has arisen, is because people didn't put in a prompt court action as they were waiting one or the other airline challenges/appeals.
In the meantime the airlines - well Jet 2 at least - have introduced these new t & c's with a 2 year limit, producing a new netful of fish.

legal_magpie

111KAB wrote: »

Appeal it!

I'm not sure that an LIP should challenge the airline on appeal except possibly to a CJ only. The risk is that if he wins the airline will probably go off to the Court of Appeal.
Better that if anyone appeals one of these cases on 2 years conditions it should be Botts as their track record is good

stevemej

fight2survive2013 wrote: »

Lost my case on 2 year limit !!!!!

Do we have any details yet? is there a report from the case?
Did you end up using Bott. and co?

DrA_Harrogate

Well, I guess you can imagine the excitement when the letter arrived from the local Court. I tore it open with trembling fingers to find I am being asked (as are 2Birds) whether or not I think another hearing is necessary!!!


Since their defence is that a part failed quite early in its maintenance cycle and this is therefore "extraordinary" and I maintain it's not, and it applied to an earlier flight anyway, and we have already argued this in Court AND we now have the Allen Case.... I think I (we) ask the Judge to do her judging.


Frustrated, moi?:mad:


As ever, all helpful suggestions gratefully examined.


AS

batman44

DrA_Harrogate wrote: »

Well, I guess you can imagine the excitement when the letter arrived from the local Court. I tore it open with trembling fingers to find I am being asked (as are 2Birds) whether or not I think another hearing is necessary!!!


Since their defence is that a part failed quite early in its maintenance cycle and this is therefore "extraordinary" and I maintain it's not, and it applied to an earlier flight anyway, and we have already argued this in Court AND we now have the Allen Case.... I think I (we) ask the Judge to do her judging.


Frustrated, moi?:mad:


As ever, all helpful suggestions gratefully examined.


AS

There is nothing extraordinary of any part failing before its time, sometimes parts fail on me when i do repairs. Same with cars you get what you pay for, if you buy cheap parts the they are bound to fail.
As this happened on a previous flight anyway then go all the way with it as they should have arranged something to cover this anyway.
I have the same issue with Monarch they claim a flat tyre is extraordinary as it was caused by a bolt stuck in the wheel and the aircraft needed a wheel change and they claim this was cause by an something beyound there control! Part and parcel of everyday running an airline just like a car, i get a flat tyre I have to repair it and sue the nail that caused it. lol!
They forget that this was not even our flight it happened but 2 flights previous!

Don't give them any leeway whatsoever, go for the jugular, they would and have with Huzar and everything else!

NoviceAngel

DrA_Harrogate wrote: »

Well, I guess you can imagine the excitement when the letter arrived from the local Court. I tore it open with trembling fingers to find I am being asked (as are 2Birds) whether or not I think another hearing is necessary!!!


Since their defence is that a part failed quite early in its maintenance cycle and this is therefore "extraordinary" and I maintain it's not, and it applied to an earlier flight anyway, and we have already argued this in Court AND we now have the Allen Case.... I think I (we) ask the Judge to do her judging.


Frustrated, moi?:mad:


As ever, all helpful suggestions gratefully examined.


AS

Absolutely barmy, I would write back and say 'If the Judge thinks that any further evidence is required in this case, post Huzar and Allen then I am quite willing to attend any such hearing.'

Throw it back at them,

Barmy, I feel frustrated and it's not even my case!

Cheers,

NoviceAngel

stevemej

So has fighttosurvive not given any feedback? Does anybody know the case details - maybe they are online.

denised

have I read somewhere rynair at court today and if so what for ?

stevemej

denised wrote: »

have I read somewhere rynair at court today and if so what for ?

there was supossed to be a case to discuss ryanairs ts and c's. it was postponed.