We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
excel parking ticket advice please
Options
Comments
-
Ok............ I know not everyone want to know, but for those who do, I have now received my third communication from excel.................reminding me that my bill of £100.00 had not been paid, and if not paid within two MORE weeks they will add £30.00 court fee and £50.00 solicitors costs!!0
-
I wonder if you can read my mind Karen ?
Guess what i'm going to say next .......You may click thanks if you found my advice useful0 -
They cannot add either of those unless and until they take it to court. They won't. And, if you see a flying pig overhead and they do, then they will be paying all the costs (including yours) because they will lose.
So do what muckybutt was about to tell you... more of same, just laugh at their pathetic attempts to con you.0 -
I would think that solicitors costs would not be allowed in most cases if you lost, and as we saw with parking cry they tried to claim £4k or so in costs, on alleged claim of maybe a £200 . Just completely ramped up costs that have no bearing on the initial penalty.
By the way give them FA have you seen the thread on pepipoo where UKCPS are taking an employer RK to the small claims, without any knowledge who the actual driver is ?Excel Parking, MET Parking, Combined Parking Solutions, VP Parking Solutions, ANPR PC Ltd, & Roxburghe Debt Collectors. What do they all have in common?
They are all or have been suspended from accessing the DVLA database for gross misconduct!
Do you really need to ask what kind of people run parking companies?0 -
Solicitors costs in relation to issue of claim are allowable in small claims, but costs of hearing are not, unless the judge holds that the other party has behaved unreasonably.
If Haswell is suing a company then he is even more stupid than we take him for. He is building up a lot of losing claims which will strengthen the supposition that he and his company are vexatious.0 -
well then karen,,are you losing sleep over this?,,i doubt it,, its great fun isnt it recieving all these threat o grams, when at the end of the day, they know and we know,,and now you do,nothing will/can be done to you,, now await the letters from,, roxburghe debt collectors(worry not, zero powers),,where the red ink gets bigger,,then janis on the next desk along will send you letters from the phoney solicitors,,graeme white,,guess what,,the red ink is even bigger on those,,but again ignore, its a scam,, no legal powers to do j.s.,so feet up now,,please keep us posted.0
-
Thanks everyone! and thanks to bondy lad..........although I'm not worrying like I was at the beginning, it's nice to hear all your advise and comments........................will keep you posted!0
-
Go outside and take a picture of your own car.
Do you now owe yourself £100 ?
Nope thought not, nor do you owe anyone else £100.Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0 -
give_them_FA wrote: »Solicitors costs in relation to issue of claim are allowable in small claims, but costs of hearing are not, unless the judge holds that the other party has behaved unreasonably.
If Haswell is suing a company then he is even more stupid than we take him for. He is building up a lot of losing claims which will strengthen the supposition that he and his company are vexatious.
I wonder whom from the company Hasbeen is trying to sue will show up in court with prove that they were not the driver of said vehicle and due to data protection laws they can't disclose the drivers list to a 3rd party :rotfl:0 -
As it's fairly obvious "a company" cannot drive a car, the case has to fail immediately. Neither will it be necessary to argue whether or not the name of the driver needs to be disclosed. This one should be struck out as disclosing no reasonable grounds of claim.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards