e petition asking for internet constrols on !!!!!! etc

bobajob_1966

Torry_Quine wrote: »

Having views such as mine can be expressed by anyone regardless of their own sexual activity.

It's a long time since I was a young girl and the world is a very different place.

The world is not that different, people just didn't talk about it so much back then. Is that your only explanation for your contradiction, 'the world is a different place'?

MissMitch

Torry_Quine wrote: »

I can fully accept that the principles by which I and others live our lives is hard for others to understand.

It's entirely because it removes sex from where it belongs which is not about giving yourself pleasure but in the relationship between the couple.

'handbag hercules' !!

I didn't have a clue as to the principles you live by, that's why I asked, I didn't realise you were religious. Tbh, I don't have a problem really with you living and believing what you wish, my only reservation would be that don't and won't ever share your opinion or chose to live by the same priciples as you, and I hope you understand that, on a personal level. I also think when were talking about the Government banning things that don't adhere to your personal beliefs but are fine by many, many other people throughout the population, I hope you can understand why people would have a problem with that.

Anyway, I've just realised that Stephen Mangan is now on tv presenting HIGNFY, so if you don't mind I have to go. Now, where's that handbag hercules!!! :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

Torry_Quine

MissMitch wrote: »

I didn't have a clue as to the principles you live by, that's why I asked, I didn't realise you were religious. Tbh, I don't have a problem really with you living and believing what you wish, my only reservation would be that don't and won't ever share your opinion or chose to live by the same priciples as you, and I hope you understand that, on a personal level. I also think when were talking about the Government banning things that don't adhere to your personal beliefs but are fine by many, many other people throughout the population, I hope you can understand why people would have a problem with that.

Anyway, I've just realised that Stephen Mangan is now on tv presenting HIGNFY, so if you don't mind I have to go. Now, where's that handbag hercules!!! :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

Still don't know what 'handbag hercules' is but that's probably best!;)

Government is about making laws for the benefit of us all and it behoves all of to contact the government if we feel it is going off track

msfoxymax

Gloomendoom wrote: »

Interesting point of view. If the !!!!!! features a man having sex with a woman, would your husband be cheating on you with the woman, the man, or both?

:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

Brighton_belle

Well I am possible the same age group as Torre Quinn and I would agree that when we were teenagers there was far less !!!!!! easily available...and it was something that never crossed my mine either.

There is much much more easily available !!!!!! around nowdue to the internet and mobile phones etc, and society is far more overtly sexualised.

Speaking to those working with teenagers today, as well as general awareness of issues in society, from reading etc it doesn't seem difficult to conclue that young girls are indeed under pressure of easily accessible !!!!!! !!!!!! creating unrealistic expectations, norms and indeed for boys too.
So just because TQ wasn't under that pressure herself a a teenager, as I wasn't, it is still easy to understand that girls are today. The world is a differnt place in terms if availability and speed of communication.

Torry_Quine

Brighton_belle wrote: »

Well I am possible the same age group as Torre Quinn and I would agree that when we were teenagers there was far less !!!!!! easily available...and it was something that never crossed my mine either.

There is much much more easily available !!!!!! around nowdue to the internet and mobile phones etc, and society is far more overtly sexualised.

Speaking to those working with teenagers today, as well as general awareness of issues in society, from reading etc it doesn't seem difficult to conclue that young girls are indeed under pressure of easily accessible !!!!!! !!!!!! creating unrealistic expectations, norms and indeed for boys too.
So just because TQ wasn't under that pressure herself a a teenager, as I wasn't, it is still easy to understand that girls are today. The world is a differnt place in terms if availability and speed of communication.

Thanks for that, you explained it very well.

adouglasmhor

jamespir wrote: »

does your husband ever get to see you naked ?

Have you ever seen a sheet with a hole in it out on a washing line and wonderd what it's for?

Lotus-eater

Torry_Quine wrote: »

I struggle to know how appreciating pornograpy can add something positive to the relationship

Torry_Quine wrote: »

Personally I have not been exposed to pornography

I have no children.

In addition to you being against masturbation, (indeed making fun of a woman who said she would do it), never having seen !!!!!! (even though you seem to be very up on the content and coercion of the individuals involved), not having the slightest idea how people can use !!!!!! and a deriding view of anyone that uses !!!!!!, you still seem to think you are in a position to decide for the rest of us what we are able to see.

It's laughable.

Torry_Quine

Lotus-eater wrote: »

In addition to you being against masturbation, (indeed making fun of a woman who said she would do it), never having seen !!!!!! (even though you seem to be very up on the content and coercion of the individuals involved), not having the slightest idea how people can use !!!!!! and a deriding view of anyone that uses !!!!!!, you still seem to think you are in a position to decide for the rest of us what we are able to see.

It's laughable.

I have never and would never make fun of any individual who masturbates and am avery angry at you for saying that.

I would have to have been locked away with no access to anyone or any media to not know about !!!!!!. You do not have to personally do something to have a view. I am not deciding for anyone, it's up to the individual to do that.

Lotus-eater

Torry_Quine wrote: »

I have never and would never make fun of any individual who masturbates and am avery angry at you for saying that.

I am very sorry, it was surfsister that did that, but you have come pretty close yourself, including calling it or the word inappropriate and just because it is natural, doesn't mean you have to do it.

Torry_Quine wrote: »

I would have to have been locked away with no access to anyone or any media to not know about !!!!!!. You do not have to personally do something to have a view. I am not deciding for anyone, it's up to the individual to do that.

You don't know anything about !!!!!!, you think you do, but you've never seen it! A very dangerous combination.

I thought you wanted to ban !!!!!!, so decide for other people?