e petition asking for internet constrols on !!!!!! etc

EchoLocation

Torry_Quine wrote: »

I'm not silly enough to now that the only reason you want an answer which you already know is to take the discussion on a whole new tangent.

I have no intention of hijacking this thread into a religious discussion, it's just a shame you're pretending that this isn't the reason for your position.

Torry_Quine

bobajob_1966 wrote: »

I'm beginning to wonder if you've even had sex ...

If you were never 'exposed' to it, why do you feel that so many young people are negatively influenced by !!!!!!? It might not have been available on the internet whilst you were young, but it was available in many other formats.

What on earth makes you come to that conclusion, I would never be so presumptious!

It was but I had no reason to purchase any.

Torry_Quine

EchoLocation wrote: »

I have no intention of hijacking this thread into a religious discussion, it's just a shame you're pretending that this isn't the reason for your position.

You have just shown that you do know the answer. I accept you may not have made it into a religious discussion but others would!

bobajob_1966

Torry_Quine wrote: »

What on earth makes you come to that conclusion, I would never be so presumptious!

It was but I had no reason to purchase any.

Your views make such a conclusion very simple to reach!

You are avoiding my question - you support the OP's view that !!!!!! has created such pressure on young girls, yet you go on to say that you faced no such pressure. How do you explain such a contradiction?

Gloomendoom

Torry_Quine wrote: »

Personally I have not been exposed to pornography

I have no children.

So how on earth do you know whether, or not, pornography can add anything positive (or otherwise) to a relationship?

System

I don't want to see this turned into a religious discussion attacking someone's beliefs ( to which they are entitled even if I personally think the interpretation of what is written in the bible is incorrect) Or see a personal attack on TorryQuine's sex life...that is un-necessary and unfair.

jamespir

Purbeck wrote: »

I don't want to see this turned into a religious discussion attacking someone's beliefs ( to which they are entitled even if I personally think the interpretation of what is written in the bible is incorrect) Or see a personal attack on TorryQuine's sex life...that is un-necessary and unfair.

i agree but she is quite happy to bash those who's sex life does not fit in with her religious beliefs

Gloomendoom

Purbeck wrote: »

I don't want to see this turned into a religious discussion attacking someone's beliefs ( to which they are entitled even if I personally think the interpretation of what is written in the bible is incorrect) Or see a personal attack on TorryQuine's sex life...that is un-necessary and unfair.

I agree......

Torry_Quine

bobajob_1966 wrote: »

Your views make such a conclusion very simple to reach!

You are avoiding my question - you support the OP's view that !!!!!! has created such pressure on young girls, yet you go on to say that you faced no such pressure. How do you explain such a contradiction?

Having views such as mine can be expressed by anyone regardless of their own sexual activity.

It's a long time since I was a young girl and the world is a very different place.

Torry_Quine

jamespir wrote: »

i agree but she is quite happy to bash those who's sex life does not fit in with her religious beliefs[/QUOTE)

I am not bashing anyone, it is up to the individual what they do. I'm trying to explain my point of view which is shared my many others.