We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Lied to Jobseekers
Comments
-
everyone factors in their circumstances when considering a holiday.skintandscared wrote: »You really don't get it do you. My overall point about the holiday money is that we factor in our circumstances and make the appropriate financial arrangements to cover it. We plan ahead so we can afford the break, and still afford to eat when we get home.0 -
Contributions based JSA only lasts six months, so I agree in principle that maybe it is unfair to prevent someone taking a holiday that their partner is paying for. However in this situation I don't see why the partner shouldn't cover the lost JSA as they can obviously afford it.
However once a family or couple is on Income based JSA I'd be surprised if they could afford a holiday abroad. Now you're going to say that maybe their parents pay for it - well in that case they should declare the money it cost and have it deducted from their benefits, yes?
Also this thing about being able to get back - if you book a cheapie package for £350 that's one thing, but if you are required to return at short notice, so have to pay perhaps £300 for a seat on a scheduled flight, that then blows the cost of the trip out of the water doesn't it? In fact how many people on Income based JSA could afford to fly back mid-holiday, regardless of actual time it would take in the air.
I haven't bogged off yet, and I ain't no babe
0 -
some holidays are booked more than 6 months in advance.Bogof_Babe wrote: »Contribution based JSA only lasts six months, so I agree in principle that maybe it is unfair to prevent someone taking a holiday that their partner is paying for. However in this situation I don't see why the partner shouldn't cover the lost JSA as they can obviously afford it.
However once a family or couple is on Income based JSA I'd be surprised if they could afford a holiday abroad. Now you're going to say that maybe their parents pay for it - well in that case they should declare the money it cost and have it deducted from their benefits, yes?
Also this thing about being able to get back - if you book a cheapie package for £350 that's one thing, but if you are required to return at short notice, so have to pay perhaps £300 for a seat on a scheduled flight, that then blows the cost of the trip out of the water doesn't it? In fact how many people on Income based JSA could afford to fly back mid-holiday, regardless of actual time it would take in the air.
declare it as income? well there is nothing on the holiday form saying if someone has paid for the holiday then you have to declare it.
the fact that it is quuestionable whether someone could afford to comeback early isnt the issue. you cant say to someone you cant do that because i dont think you can afford it. and like i said you only have to come back if the jobcentre phones you and they never do. people know this and take it into account.0 -
Someone close this thread or move it, for goodness sake!0
-
Someone close this thread or move it, for goodness sake!
Oh I don't know, it's keeping us entertained
. Don't read it if you don't want to.
If you have applied for a job that you think might suit you, it would be foolish to be away at the very time they might want to interview you. If you haven't applied for any jobs then surely you'd be sanctioned anyway for not fulfilling the JSAg requirements.
Sixer - are you any relation to Fiver? :rotfl:
I haven't bogged off yet, and I ain't no babe
0 -
I could think of other threads that keep me entertained.0
-
donnajunkie wrote: »everyone factors in their circumstances when considering a holiday.
Well clearly you don't or you wouldn't need that £65 so badly would you ... :mad:DMP Mutual Support Thread member 244
Quit smoking 13/05/2013
Joined Slimming World 02/12/13. Loss so far = 60lb in 28 weeks :j 18lb to go
0 -
sorry the freedom to voice an opinion has been removed from this thread. so certain peoples bliss will remain.skintandscared wrote: »Well clearly you don't or you wouldn't need that £65 so badly would you ... :mad:0 -
I think looby meant claim JSA for the 2 weeks holiday you are allowed.Bogof_Babe wrote: »Problem with that is, what's to stop someone swanning off to some exotic location for a few months claiming they are "job seeking"? Few months becomes couple of years, and they are still picking up their Giro from the local branch of Bank of Bermuda.
Meanwhile DWP can't get hold of them as they are not on the phone and their mobile does not accept overseas calls.
You have to have rules or those who abuse priviledges will be first on the plane or boat rubbing their factor 30 on as they leave.
You are allowed only 2 weeks holiday.
People have some strange ideas.0 -
donnajunkie wrote: »sorry the freedom to voice an opinion has been removed from this thread. so certain peoples bliss will remain.
What are you talking about?DMP Mutual Support Thread member 244
Quit smoking 13/05/2013
Joined Slimming World 02/12/13. Loss so far = 60lb in 28 weeks :j 18lb to go
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards