Revenge on a UK cold caller

Guys_Dad

Silk wrote: »

Quite agree with the last line .......However I find it very hard to understand why a company would go to the lengths you describe and reward you with a compensation payment but apply a gagging order to it.

Usualy when a company rectifies a situation they are quite happy to receive recognition for it and some even shout it from the rooftops
The facts that you don't want to mention the names of the company, the director, the people you spoke to, the nature of the call, the phone number which called etc etc all add to the smoke screen I'm afraid.

Sorry to say at the moment I feel theres more romance in this thread than a Cathrine Cookson novel :rotfl:

Looks like you must be a member of the "post on flickr and prove with a picture or it didn't happen brigade" referred to in post #35.
Can't form a brigade on your own, so count me in, old mate. :beer:

crazyguy

Silk, As I have said some Company's would rather not be shown up for having bad staff, and as for a gagging order well I suppose it is some kind of one, but if it were me there position I would hardly be wanting to show up my call centre in the public domain having such imature staff who think its ok to abuse members of the public, as for not wanting to mention the name I did agree as per the gesture of goodwill sent and received that I would in turn let the matter drop and not publicise any specific details relating to there Company name, surely you can respect that.

As I also said I do not want this money and will be passing it on to a local charity, so I feel I have benefited in two ways here, one I got justice against an abusive young lady and two some others will benefit on the back of the payment.

Sonyhamster, they did know about the recording as the Director had listened to my copy and then went back and listened to his own telephone recording, this was not an issue for him knowing that I recorded the actual call, as I can see from his actions here that he just wanted to rectify a bad situation.

All I can say is well done to the Company in question for acting quickly and resolving the problem I had, others out there could learn a lesson from this instance.

sonyhamster

robt wrote: »

You remember wrong as has already been stated in the thread.

Why can't people read before posting.

Sorry, my bad - I often find that people will post the first post and a whole load of other people post rubbish after, which is why I haven't recently read the latter..

Now that you've pointed it out, I probably should start reading them again..

Gordon_Hose

Cash the cheque then name and shame lol

Silk

crazyguy wrote: »

Silk, As I have said some Company's would rather not be shown up for having bad staff, and as for a gagging order well I suppose it is some kind of one, but if it were me there position I would hardly be wanting to show up my call centre in the public domain having such imature staff who think its ok to abuse members of the public, as for not wanting to mention the name I did agree as per the gesture of goodwill sent and received that I would in turn let the matter drop and not publicise any specific details relating to there Company name, surely you can respect that.

So all of a sudden from being incenced by these companies that plague you and getting abuse from their employees to the extent of recording them and getting hold of directors ....you suddenly give sympathy and understanding towards their good name :eek:
:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:
Why on earth would they think you were going to publish anything unless they bought you off with a gratis payment ???

Sorry Crazy but it doesn't hold water with me

Silk

Guys_Dad wrote: »

Looks like you must be a member of the "post on flickr and prove with a picture or it didn't happen brigade" referred to in post #35.
Can't form a brigade on your own, so count me in, old mate. :beer:

That makes two all we need is another 5 :beer:

Silk

Gordon_Hose wrote: »

Cash the cheque then name and shame lol

Good idea ...don't forget the pic before you bank it :rotfl:

MissKeith

Silk wrote: »

That makes two all we need is another 5 :beer:

I'm joining this brigade. I'm a disbeliever, couldn't leave it if I tried!

Silk

MissKeith wrote: »

I'm joining this brigade. I'm a disbeliever, couldn't leave it if I tried!

Your just trying to make a "Monkey" out of it now

Rhonda1523

I think it's a bit harsh to refer to them as 'vermin' - Yes you got one who was particularly bad but they're just doing their job after all...