Worst Day ever!

mikey72

shellsuit wrote: »

Excuse me, I said no such thing.

I said "ANYONE who can do this, regardless of their status to the child needs their head testing"

Meaning it doesn't matter whether it's the Mum, the Dad, the step mum, the step dad, aunty Sue or Nanna Flo, who has kicked the child out ~ it shouldn't have been done at all, by anyone.

shellsuit wrote: »

So you think it's perfectly OK to hoof a 15 year old child out of the door?

ANYONE who can do this, regardless of their status to the child needs their head testing.


ETA : And you would let your OH threaten to take your child away from you?

Yes you did, the daughter that I'm talking about. I don't think you could really argue you meant he would take his step son.
Your words exactly, and then I pointed out how biased you were.

shellsuit

mikey72 wrote: »

Yes you did, the daughter that I'm talking about. I don't think you could really argue you meant he would take his step son.
Your words exactly, and then I pointed out how biased you were.

If my OH, Father to the youngest, kicked my 14 yr old son out and then said if I didn't like it he would take our baby away, my OH would be out of the door.

Why?

Because that is not what a responsible parent does.

So it doesn't matter which child belongs to who, you don't do or threaten things like that with regards to children!

And if I kicked MY son out then threatened to take OUR son away, I'd expect my OH to kick me out of the door too!

So I'm not biased at all.

mikey72

shellsuit wrote: »

If my OH, Father to the youngest, kicked my 14 yr old son out and then said if I didn't like it he would take our baby away, my OH would be out of the door.

Why?

Because that is not what a responsible parent does.

So it doesn't matter which child belongs to who, you don't do or threaten things like that with regards to children!

And if I kicked MY son out then threatened to take OUR son away, I'd expect my OH to kick me out of the door too!

So I'm not biased at all.

So you are saying you said it then?
I don't think it's actually the mother that decides custody, so I'm afraid it'll be the judge that'll decide that for you as well then.

LilacLouisa

mikey72 wrote: »

Guess you weren't reading what you posted earlier then :rotfl::rotfl:

I was talking about things that could have easily become reality, not suitcases full of money or magic pixies either.

LilacLouisa

mikey72 wrote: »

So you are saying you said it then?
I don't think it's actually the mother that decides custardy, so I'm afraid it'll be the judge that'll decide that for you as well then.

Custardy, I love that, hehehe.

mikey72

LilacLouisa wrote: »

Custardy, I love that, hehehe.

Glad we've found your level at last then.

shellsuit

mikey72 wrote: »

So you are saying you said it then?
I don't think it's actually the mother that decides custody, so I'm afraid it'll be the judge that'll decide that for you as well then.

It's not custardy and it's not custody.

You're talking in riddles and it's getting boring now.

mikey72

shellsuit wrote: »

It's not custardy and it's not custody.

You're talking in riddles and it's getting boring now.

Same level.

If spelling is now your main point, I agree it's boring.

LilacLouisa

mikey72 wrote: »

Glad we've found your level at last then.

I was going to post an amusing reply, but I think it would be inappropriate, it is a serious subject being discussed on this thread.

shellsuit

mikey72 wrote: »

Same level.

If spelling is now your main point, I agree it's boring.

Now you're just talking shoite.

Bye bye.