We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
PPI Reclaiming discussion Part II
Options
Comments
-
-
Hi!
Thanks for that will get onto this now - am sooooooo mad!
I checked with the Royal mail and they confirmed delivery and stated that should they had been unable to deliver it they would have returned it with a sticker stating the reason why. They stated it was delivered and therefore the receiver must have returned it!
They signed for it at 9.50am by a E Dyer on 08.10.08 - must be an employee of Freedom.
They did not state on the letter the reason for returning, but it is unopended so I can only asume Mr Farr is trying to ignore me!light bulb moment: 30.08.08!!0 -
Just to reassure anyone who thinks there is not a lot of successes or their company doesnt seem to payout.Some companys will put a confidential clause in a settlement and you can't discuss the outcome.They dont want everyone to know they give in!DS1 12/10/04
DS2 13/07/06
DD1 06/12/070 -
Hi!
Thanks for that will get onto this now - am sooooooo mad!
I checked with the Royal mail and they confirmed delivery and stated that should they had been unable to deliver it they would have returned it with a sticker stating the reason why. They stated it was delivered and therefore the receiver must have returned it!
They signed for it at 9.50am by a E Dyer on 08.10.08 - must be an employee of Freedom.
They did not state on the letter the reason for returning, but it is unopended so I can only asume Mr Farr is trying to ignore me!
This is not good practice from any of these companies, one being authorised by the FSA and the other holding a CCL.0 -
Hi!
Thanks for that will get onto this now - am sooooooo mad!
I checked with the Royal mail and they confirmed delivery and stated that should they had been unable to deliver it they would have returned it with a sticker stating the reason why. They stated it was delivered and therefore the receiver must have returned it!
They signed for it at 9.50am by a E Dyer on 08.10.08 - must be an employee of Freedom.
They did not state on the letter the reason for returning, but it is unopended so I can only asume Mr Farr is trying to ignore me!
That awful, are these covered by the FOS?DS1 12/10/04
DS2 13/07/06
DD1 06/12/070 -
I have tried, but never get hold of him. So I have only corresponded through emails and various letters.
Its just so annoying when you know that they are only doing this to avoid paying what they owe!light bulb moment: 30.08.08!!0 -
simone, who was it actually addressed to ...0
-
That awful, are these covered by the FOS?
The OFT need lots of complaints about companies like this and the FSA need to do something too.0 -
marshallka wrote: »So is this a final response then that you have now. If it is then you need to get your complaint into the FOS now. You can download a complaint form from here and send it recorded delivery too.
http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/consumer/complaints.htm
Make the complaint for both the loan and the top up
Thank you very much!
:beer:0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards