Electric cars not allowed at park home site.

clive0510
clive0510 Posts: 874 Forumite
Fifth Anniversary 500 Posts
I live in a park home on a residential site. All the residents here have been furnished with a letter informing us that all electric vehicles are to be excluded from the site, due to the fire risk. My take on that, is that given the governments big push to promote electric vehicles, we eventually will not be able to have a car. I'm just wondering if there are any other park home owners on here, and if so are you faced with the same dilemma?
«1345678

Comments

  • Brie
    Brie Posts: 14,130 Ambassador
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    So this is a change to the T&Cs that we agreed when you moved there? 

    I wonder what would happen if you owned an EV and were now being told you could no longer use your parking space.  Personally it sounds legally unenforceable. 

    But I am neither an EV owner or a park home resident.
    I’m a Forum Ambassador and I support the Forum Team on Debt Free Wannabe and Old Style Money Saving boards.  If you need any help on these boards, do let me know. Please note that Ambassadors are not moderators. Any posts you spot in breach of the Forum Rules should be reported via the report button, or by emailing forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com. All views are my own and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.

    "Never retract, never explain, never apologise; get things done and let them howl.”  Nellie McClung
    ⭐️🏅😇
  • DE_612183
    DE_612183 Posts: 3,394 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    I presume this is to do with charging the cars on site - perhaps the electrical load creates the fire hazard?

    Have the site owners given reasons - could be insurance as well...
  • clive0510
    clive0510 Posts: 874 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 500 Posts
    Thanks for the replies. Apparently the board have made this decision on the fire officers advice. And also the company;s insurance company would not cover the park in the event of a fire caused by a  lithium battery on an electric car, the board feel there is no other option. 
  • Car_54
    Car_54 Posts: 8,739 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Maybe I'm being dim, but in the very unlikely event of a fire, how could the park be held responsible?
  • Mr.Generous
    Mr.Generous Posts: 3,918 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Car_54 said:
    Maybe I'm being dim, but in the very unlikely event of a fire, how could the park be held responsible?

    When the whole park burnt down they might feel a hint of regret.
    Mr Generous - Landlord for more than 10 years. Generous? - Possibly but sarcastic more likely.
  • clive0510
    clive0510 Posts: 874 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 500 Posts
    Car_54 said:
    Maybe I'm being dim, but in the very unlikely event of a fire, how could the park be held responsible?
    Regardless of who would be responsible in the event of a fire, I do think our board of directors here have taken this decision on the basis of prevention is better than cure. 
    having said that none of this solves the core problem of no one on this site being able to own a car in the not to distant future. 
  • Mildly_Miffed
    Mildly_Miffed Posts: 1,353 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    clive0510 said:
    Thanks for the replies. Apparently the board have made this decision on the fire officers advice. And also the company;s insurance company would not cover the park in the event of a fire caused by a  lithium battery on an electric car, the board feel there is no other option. 
    Will they also be excluding hybrids?

    How about other lithium cells, such as powertools and rechargeable torches and mobile phones and laptops?

    I think I'd be asking to see the "fire officer's advice" and the "insurer's refusal" in writing...
    ...or just accepting that the owners of the park are idiots, and selling.
  • letom
    letom Posts: 50 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    This is probably another reason why EVs will likely not be the mode of transport for the future, an EV fire is incredibly difficult to put out.

    When an EV fire starts and the cells go into thermal runway you can't just put it out, you essentially have to wait for it to burn itself out, though they can even reignite after weeks as damaged battery cells can catch fire.

    Therefore the scale of damage of one EV is significantly higher than an ICE which unlike a EV reacts more positively to water being used to put it out. Many countries are bringing in certain protocols to deal with EV fires e.g. recovered vehicles being placed in isolated areas for weeks after the fire (someone has to pay for this). If you're an insurer 1 EV fire is therefore quite expensive. Think about it, tiny electric scooter batteries are bringing down entire houses, imagine an underground car park full EVs and all those batteries.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.4K Life & Family
  • 255.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.