📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Money Moral Dilemma: Should our four-year-old child pay for her own extracurricular activities?

Options
1235710

Comments

  • Danzan
    Danzan Posts: 6 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary First Post Combo Breaker
    For our kids, all the money they got when they were younger, we used to overpay our mortgage (knowing that we will replace this after, say for uni fees or their deposit for their house). As they got older they managed their own cash gifts to buy whatever they want. 

    I would say go ahead and pay for it. In reality the activities they do will be worth more to the child than the cash when they grow up. 

    As a parent you have the choice!
  • Exodi
    Exodi Posts: 3,976 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Wedding Day Wonder Name Dropper
    edited 15 January at 12:43AM
    Danzan said:
    I would say go ahead and pay for it. In reality the activities they do will be worth more to the child than the cash when they grow up.
    Oh yes, not a day goes by where I'm not reminiscing about all the activities I did as a four year old child.

    Undoubtedly, these memories were infinitely more valuable to me than say, my first car, or a contribution towards a deposit on my first house.

    Does anyone even remember being four years old?

    I understand why you said it given your first sentence, but I'd suggest it's a pretty controversial take.
    Know what you don't
  • witchone
    witchone Posts: 13 Forumite
    10 Posts Second Anniversary
    Maybe let her do her washing and cook her own tea too
  • Matt8888
    Matt8888 Posts: 80 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 10 Posts
    No of course not. What next? Chipping in for petrol, food, heating, Netflix? The money was given to her presumably for the future by friends and family. It is not yours to dip into now. Next time, suggest to friends and family paying for an activity but don't take money for it retrospectively. (If you do this, and you are not existing on the breadline, you could argue that when you have not paid for an activity and have enjoyed a little luxury yourself you have used her money to pay for it - think about it).
  • Annie1612
    Annie1612 Posts: 176 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    No in my opinion, no you shouldn’t use your child’s money to pay for activities that ultimately you decide she will do. Paying for extra-curricular activities are a part of parenting. 
  • kimwp
    kimwp Posts: 2,997 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    At four, she cannot be expected to understand financial consequences, so you are making the decision to use up her money on something that may be a waste of money. 

    At the very least, why don't you ask the people who gave the money if they are happy to use it for those purposes. 

    But my personal view is that a four year old shouldn't be doing four structured extracurricular activities a week - one or two is plenty, then there's time to have fun, spend time with parents, let their little brains process all the new things they are learning. They are not just learning sums and writing, but lots of social skills at school - they need lots of down time as well.
    Statement of Affairs (SOA) link: https://www.lemonfool.co.uk/financecalculators/soa.php

    For free, non-judgemental debt advice, try: Stepchange or National Debtline. Beware fee charging companies with similar names.
  • john_evmk
    john_evmk Posts: 14 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    It's sad that someone even thinks it appropriate to ask such a thing.
  • refinnejks
    refinnejks Posts: 5 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary First Post
    It’s not inappropriate. I don’t understand why some replies sound so angry. I don’t mind what money given to my nephews is spent on. As an adult I now know that sometimes my mum struggled to afford even £1 a week for Brownies, which I got so much from so if this child has a pot of money that can fund activities then why shouldn’t it. Parents are able to make choices for their children until they can make those choices for themselves. If the child wants to do activities and one way of facilitating that is from their savings that’s a great option. 
  • VintageBelle
    VintageBelle Posts: 324 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    NO! She's 4. You pay. It's not like she can get a job and start paying herself, or even understands any of it. The money in her account should be saved for her when she's older and can do something with it when she understands it better. Will you start taking the money out to use for her groceries too? Children are expensive, so other peoples gifts should not be paying for things that are your responsibilities and decisions. 
  • This is a difficult one as instead of getting presents your child has been getting money which went into her bank account.  Why did you not let your child have presents with the money?  You put he money in the bank, not your child and now you want your child at four years old to pay for her own activities?  No, paying for activities for a child that age is not a child's job - you can then control the activities and it will make you think harder about which ones she may be more likely to stick at.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.