We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Adidas threatening letter

Options
2456712

Comments

  • Yes, just this letter from no where. 

    No idea about the rest…
  • pinkshoes
    pinkshoes Posts: 20,550 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 1 May 2022 at 3:23PM
    It was returned via pre paid label which was issued online by adidas. I was asked to take it to the post office which I did. This was towards the end of last year before he went travelling and he received an email to say it was on its way back to adidas. Is this deemed a court letter? Now I really am worried!
    OK, so if THEY issued the returns label, then they are responsible for the lost parcel.

    It was entirely your son's responsibility to chase this up as it's his account. HE needs to log into his account, look up the tracking number with the courier (hopefully it still shows it was delivered), then let Adidas know that it DID arrive. If the tracking is showing as not delivered, he needs to contact Adidas and tell them that the parcel was returned with their own courier label, he has proof that it was sent.

    If he hasn't got any tracking details any more, he needs to still contact Adidas and let them know that the goods were returned with THEIR courier label and he can prove they were returned.

    In reality, this "legal threat" letter will have been sent because your son has ignored previous correspondence from Adidas. I appreciate he was travelling, but he would have no doubt had access to his email?!?!

    You have done nothing wrong and quite frankly your son needs to learn some manners and grow a pair if he has the audacity to accuse you of ruining his life! How rude of him!


    Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
    Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')

    No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)
  • user1977
    user1977 Posts: 17,807 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    pinkshoes said:

    In reality, this court letter will have been sent 

    There's no mention of court (in the bit the OP has copied anyway). And if there were, a letter before action from a firm of solicitors doesn't have a different legal status from one sent by Adidas themselves.
  • Yes, this is the first correspondence.

    we have checked the tracking and it is definitely marked as delivered.

    apparently this letter has been sent out to a large number over the weekend and they think it may be an error (adidas live chat)
  • Manxman_in_exile
    Manxman_in_exile Posts: 8,380 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    DWF are a bona fide legal firm and that number looks legit.

    But I don't think that that letter is a Letter Before Claim?  Does it say they will sue if no payment is made?  Bit odd that it doesn't include an order reference or any detail as to how the amount in dispute is made up.

    I think the OP's son needs to contact Adidas pronto on Tuesday to find out what is going on here.  Hopefully the OP has evidence that they sent something* back.

    Seems extraordinary to me that over a grandsworth of goods being returned to Adidas went astray.  Who spends over a grand with Adidas?  Was it kit for a whole team?

    Can't help feeling something isn't being told here.  Knowing the whole story might be helpful...

    *I'd have thought it might be difficult to fabricate sending back stuff worth over £1000.  It's hardly likely to be in a shoebox

    And I suspect quite a few big retailers pay refunds before receipt of returned goods...
  • Ath_Wat
    Ath_Wat Posts: 1,504 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    All those saying it's the son's responsibility might have a point, if the OP hadn't taken it upon themselves to (apparently) log into the son's account, print a label and send the things back without consulting her son.

    I am not sure what proof you get of posting something if you use a prepaid label.  Obviously you could print it and then throw it in the bin.  Presumably the post office gives you something when you hand it over, and this should be sufficient to prove it's Adidas's problem.  If the OP has lost or thrown this away, then it is her responsibility and they or the son need to speak to the Post Office to see if they have a record they can provide.  But you can't disclaim responsibility for something after you have involved yourself unnecessarily.
  • Thank you guys. All advice has been well and truly received and will be processed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.