We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Chase 1.5% Easy Access
Comments
-
Just opened. 5 mins. no hiccups with ID. Money instantly into savings.
Marcus must be haemorrhaging today
16 Panel (250W JASolar) 4kWp, facing 170 degrees, 40 degree slope, Solis Inverter. Installed 29/9/2015 - £4700 (Norfolk Solar Together Scheme); 9.6kWh US2000C Pylontech batteries + Solis Inverter installed 12/4/2022 Year target (PVGIS-CMSAF) = 3880kWh - Installer estimate 3452 kWh:Average over 6 years = 4400 :j0 -
Even after you have passed ID checks, they make you go through all the questions because some people have positively lied to their bank because the fraudsters who made them make the transfer have instructed them to lie to their bank. It sounds unbelievable, but this has happened, and not just once.S_uk said:Made a payment from Natwest last night which was blocked. Called them and payment was released.
Made another payment this morning, blocked again. Sigh. I wonder if this is someone that's going to regularly happen now. Wouldn't have minded so much if I wasn't on hold for a long time. The impression that I had from the conversation was that the fact that the account couldn't be verified when I set up the payment makes it more likely to be flagged. What I don't understand is why, once the payer has passed security and confirmed it's their own account they're paying to, the automatic flagging/blocking process still continues to apply when paying that particular payee.
I do agree that the fraud detection software should "learn" which of the payees on your account are bonafide and not block them once they have been confirmed once, and I think at least some of them, e.g. at Virgin Money and Santander, seem to do just that.0 -
Dear savers, you are making the fraud department people work overtime with all this money sloshing about. Show some love towards them

2 -
I can’t imagine Marcus going much beyond 1% when they go….keeping a little bit with them though just in case they go nuts. Expecting YBS to move to 1.05% next week too, but can’t see anyone getting near Chase for easy access in the near future.Rheumatoid said:Just opened. 5 mins. no hiccups with ID. Money instantly into savings.
Marcus must be haemorrhaging today
0 -
I appreciate they have to check, but my complaint wasn't that they have to block suspicious payments, it's the fact that they continue to automatically do so even after the customer has already verified it as their account and are legitimate payments. If it's been blocked once then released after confirming with the payer, I don't see why it should be blocked again.Daliah said:
Even after you have passed ID checks, they make you go through all the questions because some people have positively lied to their bank because the fraudsters who made them make the transfer have instructed them to lie to their bank. It sounds unbelievable, but this has happened, and not just once.S_uk said:Made a payment from Natwest last night which was blocked. Called them and payment was released.
Made another payment this morning, blocked again. Sigh. I wonder if this is someone that's going to regularly happen now. Wouldn't have minded so much if I wasn't on hold for a long time. The impression that I had from the conversation was that the fact that the account couldn't be verified when I set up the payment makes it more likely to be flagged. What I don't understand is why, once the payer has passed security and confirmed it's their own account they're paying to, the automatic flagging/blocking process still continues to apply when paying that particular payee.
I do agree that the fraud detection software should "learn" which of the payees on your account are bonafide and not block them once they have been confirmed once, and I think at least some of them, e.g. at Virgin Money and Santander, seem to do just that.0 -
Hi.
Do you have toswt up direct debits on the current account?0 -
Info from another forum suggests that this savings account can be used to pay standing orders (i.e. send money to your other bank accounts for the round robin monthly pay ins) and direct debits (pay your credit card)
Could be quite useful in addition to the 1.5% interest.
0 -
No you don't. You do not have to use the current account at all but you can use some or all of its functions, whatever suits you.[Deleted User] said:Hi.
Do you have toswt up direct debits on the current account?1 -
I did test SOs / future payment from the savings account and they both work fine. Very useful feature if you need a hub account for Regular Savers etc.crumpet_man said:Info from another forum suggests that this savings account can be used to pay standing orders (i.e. send money to your other bank accounts for the round robin monthly pay ins) and direct debits (pay your credit card)
Could be quite useful in addition to the 1.5% interest.
I can't get excited myself about Chase DDs as they don't pay cashback or rewards. I pay my credit cards with Halifax Reward debit cards. Appreciate it could be very different for others.0 -
Also sorry for another question.
Do you have to wait to get the current account before you can open the savings account.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 245.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
