We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

The DEATH of the hard shoulder

Options
Even prior to reading the below article, I could not understand how eliminating the hard shoulder is a good thing. I've driven enough around English motorways to know people seldom follow the speed limit, let alone closed lane signals, and not having a hard shoulder is almost a death sentence for someone who has simply broken down without spinning off the road.

Thoughts? 

https://uk.yahoo.com/news/chief-constable-warned-ministers-coroners-161413661.html
«1345678

Comments

  • Grumpy_chap
    Grumpy_chap Posts: 18,252 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    So, if all-lane-running smart motorways are a bad thing, as per the article, that is the kiss-of-life for hard shoulder, not their death knell.
  • facade
    facade Posts: 7,588 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 24 January 2021 at 8:25PM
    I think the point is Highways England are continuing to implement them, and will carry on until there is enough Scientific Evidence ( i.e. avoidable deaths) to support what Common Sense suggested in the first place.

    (Sound familiar?)
    I want to go back to The Olden Days, when every single thing that I can think of was better.....

    (except air quality and Medical Science ;))
  • Supersonos
    Supersonos Posts: 1,080 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    Don't worry - considering everyone and their mother sees fit to drive in the middle lane, lane 1 has become the new hard shoulder.  It's probably the safest place on a motorway.
  • Ectophile
    Ectophile Posts: 7,975 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    If you break down on the inside lane of a "smart" motorway, then you should get everybody out of the car and over the crash barrier as quickly as possible.
    I've had a near miss on a section of the M25 converted to all lane running, without the safety systems in place.  I was in lane 2, about to overtake a car in lane 1.  Suddenly, the car swerved in front of me, forcing me to suddenly swerve in front of the vehicle in lane 3.
    There was a car broken down in lane 1.  There were no automatic warning signs, as there were supposed to have been, because Highways England hadn't bothered to install them.
    If it sticks, force it.
    If it breaks, well it wasn't working right anyway.
  • Smart Motorways! Never was there a more incorrect name for a road.
    I'd rather be an Optimist and be proved wrong than a Pessimist and be proved right.
  • The advice is to get out of the car and stay over the barrier even where there is a hard shoulder of course. 
  • MX5huggy
    MX5huggy Posts: 7,162 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The first section of “smart” motorway had refuge lay-bys every 400m latest specification is every 2.2km. Value engineered to be dangerous. 
  • the stretch of the m4 by reading services, that they are converting to smart motorway has been going on now for about 3 yrs. by the time its finished someone will have invented something else, making it a waste of time.
  • Supersonos
    Supersonos Posts: 1,080 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    Ectophile said:
    There were no automatic warning signs, 
    People ignore these anyway as nine times out of ten they warn of a problem that isn't there.
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The advice is to get out of the car and stay over the barrier even where there is a hard shoulder of course. 
    This bit ^^^
    HC275 - leave the vehicle by the left-hand door and ensure your passengers do the same... return and wait near your vehicle (well away from the carriageway and hard shoulder)

    If somebody is killed while sitting in a broken-down car on a smart motorway, they've failed to do the single most basic thing to protect themselves.

    There were 38 deaths on smart motorways between 2014 and 2019. There were 107 deaths on the motorway network in 2018, and 99 in 2017. That's from all causes, not just stationary vehicles being hit... So let's call smart motorway deaths about 7.5% of all motorway deaths, if we assume 500 over that 5yr period.

    Yet smart motorways are now up to about 15% of the motorway network - and they're the busiest stretches, the ones you'd expect to have more serious collisions...

    Smart motorways have one job, and one job only - to increase traffic flow. They do that by increasing the number of lanes. There is rarely an option to widen the carriageway - because it's usually already been done to the maximum available width. Perhaps if people actually used motorway lanes properly, we'd get more traffic down the current lanes?
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.