CST letters' forum group thread

worriedegg

Thanks @Trainerman, this email was a response to my replying to the letter before claim. How is best to respond to this? Or do I not? 

Apologies if this wasn’t clear. 

Thanks again. 

Trainerman

Well, they threaten legal action ... but it might not happen. If you have already had LoC and replied to that in the approved manner, I would sit tight. Ignore debt collector rubbish and see whether they actually raise a claim.

IF they do, the forum will help you fight it. 

If you move house, advise the PPC of your new address, and to erase your old one. This will avoid a sneaky default CCJ

TheDefiantOne

Can Can I get advice on how to respond to this please? First I've heard of CST as it was debt recovery before this. Thanks in advance 

KeithP

TheDefiantOne said:

 Can I get advice on how to respond to this please? First I've heard of CST as it was debt recovery before this. Thanks in advance 

See the mention of Debt Recovery Plus Ltd?
That is nothing more than a debt collectors letter.

The fourth post of the NEWBIES thread explains exactly how to deal with debt collector's letters, but to summarise that post - ignore them.

patient_dream

CST LAW are still pumping out rubbish .... 

DRP CANNOT INSTRUCT CST as it's not their debt, it belongs to the PPC

We really don't know why CST ARE SO STUPID.   This thread is full of CST rubbish, it's like dealing with a kids playschool, not a legal ..... TOTAL INCOMPETENCE

This is just another drivel CST debt chasing letter ... JUST IGNORE THE RUBBISH
DO NOT REPLY OR TALK TO THEM   Even DRP know they are talking utter rubbish

If you get a letter before claim giving you 30 days to respond, come back here

You throw that letter in the rubbish bin where it belongs

PS: These fools are trying to scare you when they mention a CCJ, 
That is NOT going to happen
And they mention the Beavis case ??? One day CST MIGHT JUST UNDERSTAND THE BEAVIS CASE which they are going against because of their fakery adding £70

The Beavis case is more on YOUR side because the Court ruled that the parking charge included the cost of operating the scheme/ NOT TO ADD FAKES

How the SRA allow CST LAW to operate is beyond words

TheDefiantOne

Thank you so much for your quick responses. Will ignore for now then.

Coupon-mad

worriedegg said:

Thanks @Trainerman, this email was a response to my replying to the letter before claim. How is best to respond to this?

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/80554334/#Comment_80554334

KeithP

@Hater_of_CST, you have just posted your full name.
Are you happy with that?

Hater_of_CST

KeithP said:

@Hater_of_CST, you have just posted your full name.
Are you happy with that?

I realised just after I'd done it 😣 but as new member can't delete or edit it so have reported it as best I can think to do.... any other ways I can remove it faster? Can you report it also if that helps speeds it up? Thanks

KeithP

Hater_of_CST said:

KeithP said:

@Hater_of_CST, you have just posted your full name.
Are you happy with that?

I realised just after I'd done it 😣 but as new member can't delete or edit it so have reported it as best I can think to do.... any other ways I can remove it faster? Can you report it also if that helps speeds it up? Thanks

No, sorry, I have no influence.

The MSE Forum Team only work weekdays during the day. Should get deleted tomorrow morning sometime.