Bwlegal & UK Parking Patrol LTD Altering Documents please help

KeithP

That was a big mistake sending originals as evidence to the court.
What happens if the case never reaches a hearing? Are you hoping/expecting your evidence to be returned?

Courts have also been known to lose files.

Too late for you now, but hopefully others reading this will never do that. Send copies - take originals to any hearing.

beamerguy

Bilbo_Baz said:

Ok but in this case UKPPO LTD are the ones who have added the £60.00 onto the original charge notice I did not receive this until April 20th 2020 deadline to submit papers it was omitted in paper work sent to me by BW Legal in November 2019 with copys of photo's  parking charge notice  and reminder so I could not defend with this until April 2020 because I had not seen this peice of paper with the add on before.
But really if Bw Legal and other collection firms do not add this then they will get no payment unless case goes to court thus they will fight tooth and nail to win this eventually ! 

It is only heresay that the add-on of £60 is from the PPC ?
BWLegal told the SRA that they act on their clients instructions.  An easy way out for when there were so many complaints to the SRA.about BWL

The £60 rubbish came about when BWLegal got involved, you work that one out ?

Work under no illusion, the £60 is unlawful it is a {Text removed by Forum Team} .
The Supreme court made it clear, the ticket price includes the cost of recovery and the reason BWLegal and other dodgy legals get spanked in court is because they go against a much higher authority

If PPC's and legals cannot understand this and as the water is getting very hot for them, they should get out

BWLEGAL WILL NEVER WIN THE £60 {Text removed by Forum Team}

KeithP

Expect several PMs now.

Keep in mind that all the people reading this open forum may not have your objectives at heart.

Remember, the parking companies are known to read this forum.

DoaM

You don't need Skype for Business, just Skype. (The business version has been deprecated anyway in favour of Microsoft Teams).

Le_Kirk

Why would you want a situation where you cannot question in front of a judge, anything that the claimant might put in their papers, nor be able to cross examine the claimant?

beamerguy

 I suggested that the case just be adjudicated on paper by e mail to the court  by the judge with neither party going to a hearing I think BW have just suggested the same thing. Similar to a council PNC going to adjudication.

You are playing a game of poker to which your odds are 10-15% to win if heard on papers

Bilbo_Baz

complaint letter

nosferatu1001

You can be a Lay Rep for the defendant, same as you will find talked about in the newbies thread, and in multiple threads. You take a copy of the lay rep act 1999 with you, to prove it to the court. 

Le_Kirk

Bilbo_Baz said:

And the main witness ?

Who is the main witness and why is it relevant?  What do you mean by your comment/question?

nosferatu1001

Then you cant be the lay rep. Pick one or the other. 
If she needs an interpreter, did you state this on the DQ? Have you told the court this at any point?