Napier Parking - Waterlooville, Hampshire - Now BW Legal

privatepilot

beamerguy said:

privatepilot said:

Umkomaas said:

privatepilot said:

Further to my post, the owners of Charterhouse Projects LLP is/are the owners of Napier Parking Ltd themselves. Where does that leave me?

Forgetting about obtaining a landowner cancellation?

Thats what I thought, so now to wait for the SAR from Napier and also waiting BWLegal to confirm the account is on hold for 30 days. 

You have discovered a line of incest ....... no interest to a judge. 

Slightly confused? Have I dont something incorrectly?
I only said the above because I was trying for landowner cancellation, but considering the land owner company is owned by the directors of Napier Parking, this is no longer possible 

beamerguy

privatepilot said:

beamerguy said:

privatepilot said:

Umkomaas said:

privatepilot said:

Further to my post, the owners of Charterhouse Projects LLP is/are the owners of Napier Parking Ltd themselves. Where does that leave me?

Forgetting about obtaining a landowner cancellation?

Thats what I thought, so now to wait for the SAR from Napier and also waiting BWLegal to confirm the account is on hold for 30 days. 

You have discovered a line of incest ....... no interest to a judge. 

Slightly confused? Have I dont something incorrectly?
I only said the above because I was trying for landowner cancellation, but considering the land owner company is owned by the directors of Napier Parking, this is no longer possible 

You have none nothing wrong .... the point is your findings shows a tangled web but no worries, The first mistake BWL made is to add a fake £60 which they cannot explain, they do try a feeble attempt to explain which as we all know in nonsensical

privatepilot

beamerguy said:

privatepilot said:

beamerguy said:

privatepilot said:

Umkomaas said:

privatepilot said:

Further to my post, the owners of Charterhouse Projects LLP is/are the owners of Napier Parking Ltd themselves. Where does that leave me?

Forgetting about obtaining a landowner cancellation?

Thats what I thought, so now to wait for the SAR from Napier and also waiting BWLegal to confirm the account is on hold for 30 days. 

You have discovered a line of incest ....... no interest to a judge. 

Slightly confused? Have I dont something incorrectly?
I only said the above because I was trying for landowner cancellation, but considering the land owner company is owned by the directors of Napier Parking, this is no longer possible 

You have none nothing wrong .... the point is your findings shows a tangled web but no worries, The first mistake BWL made is to add a fake £60 which they cannot explain, they do try a feeble attempt to explain which as we all know in nonsensical

Thanks for the response and reassuring words, I will sit and wait for the SAR info back and also the BWLegal confirmation of hold on account

privatepilot

Just received the SAR back from Napier, there is a letter in there which they say went to my address as NTD, but this was never received...
I am still waiting BW Legal to confirm my account is on hold for 30 days....
Is there anything I should do whilst i wait the next step?

Coupon-mad

Nope, but it is interesting to see that Napier has this sister company; wonder what the reason is for calling it a 'Finance' company?  This is news to me, I didn't know that had this company and I hope they end up being sniffed around by the FCA, if the new Code of Practice Framework throws the FCA into the mix:

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09315136/filing-history

Redx

privatepilot said:

beamerguy said:

privatepilot said:

Umkomaas said:

privatepilot said:

Further to my post, the owners of Charterhouse Projects LLP is/are the owners of Napier Parking Ltd themselves. Where does that leave me?

Forgetting about obtaining a landowner cancellation?

Thats what I thought, so now to wait for the SAR from Napier and also waiting BWLegal to confirm the account is on hold for 30 days. 

You have discovered a line of incest ....... no interest to a judge. 

Slightly confused? Have I dont something incorrectly?
I only said the above because I was trying for landowner cancellation, but considering the land owner company is owned by the directors of Napier Parking, this is no longer possible 

That DeSavery link and lineage is no surprise at all

The claimant only has to show that they sent up the NTD , either with proof of OTBOP argument , of more likely to have done a task they do daily than not. They do not have to show it arrived , it's deemed to be delivered 2 days later

Nothing else to do but to prepare for court , getting your docs and exhibits etc in order , but ideally reading other Court claim threads on here

Check if the NTD complied with POFA

KeithP

privatepilot said:

Just received the SAR back from Napier, there is a letter in there which they say went to my address as NTD, but this was never received...

How strange.

The only name and address that they had at that time was that of the Registered Keeper.

I wonder where they got the driver's name and address from to allow them to send Notice to Driver by post?

A Notice to Driver is never sent by post. It is placed on the vehicle at the time of the alleged parking event. Anything sent by post is a Notice to Keeper.

privatepilot

KeithP said:

privatepilot said:

Just received the SAR back from Napier, there is a letter in there which they say went to my address as NTD, but this was never received...

How strange.

The only name and address that they had at that time was that of the Registered Keeper.

I wonder where they got the driver's name and address from to allow them to send Notice to Driver by post?

A Notice to Driver is never sent by post. It is placed on the vehicle at the time of the alleged parking event. Anything sent by post is a Notice to Keeper.

There was nothing left on the car when I left the car park. The issue with this ticket is, I paid parking via the app, but I miss-typed the Reg by one letter. I was abroad when they sent the letters, which meant I missed the 21 days appeal period. And then was handed to BW Legal. 
They got my details from both DVLA and also VWFS (Lease company), but the original letter had my address on it, even before they got my info from the lease company....

privatepilot

Coupon-mad said:

Nope, but it is interesting to see that Napier has this sister company; wonder what the reason is for calling it a 'Finance' company?  This is news to me, I didn't know that had this company and I hope they end up being sniffed around by the FCA, if the new Code of Practice Framework throws the FCA into the mix:

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09315136/filing-history

I agree, I did not know they had this company. Although looking at the letters, it says you can agree to pay monthly, by taking out the payment options, which I think you would then take out a legal finance agreement with Napier Finance, which would then be on your credit file. 

Redx

Maybe the app gave them your details ?

In any case , the hire or lease company have them the hirer or lessee details , so effectively Napier would have sent out an NTH , H for Hirer , not an NTD , because they have no idea who was driving , they can assume that it was the lessee , but assumptions are not fact

Minor keying errors come under de minimis , trivial