CEL Letter before action

kevalicat

Thanks KeithP, I will get on that now.

nosferatu1001

No, no it hasnt. Try again
I asked if you had replied to the LBA. Was that "wrong" or "arrogant"? It was a simple question. 
You said no
So you were directed to respond to the LBA, you then stated 
"I stated the LBA in my first line on the first post? " WHich means pretty much nothing, but it seems like youre saying the LBA is in the first line - to which "and" is abnout the only possiblre response. Because responding to theLBA is true regardless of the precise details OF the LBA - youre compelled via the PAP to respond. 
I'll steer clear, as you seem unable to write complete sentences that make any sense
Bye!

kevalicat

Thanks. KeithP did amend his post as he first stated I had never mentioned the LBA before, hence my response. Maybe slow down, people here do appreciate the help, but some of the aggression is really not needed.

nosferatu1001

It isnt aggression. Thats in your mind. 
Its being blunt - that the newbies thread is really, really, REALLY obvious, and completely covers what you need to do. Instead of wasting time arguing here you couldhave written your response by now, and had it shown here to have a look at
In other words, something constructive.
If your posst was wrong, then you need to edit it. Its a written forum. I dont read minds. 

kevalicat

nosferatu1001 said:

I would take it as closed, personally.

BTW I dont know what you mean by "carry on" - the ball is in their court. You either pay, or wait for them to respond to the appeal, or something else. 
You, as a consumer, are entitled to RELY ON any written communication. You are relying on this, which states the appeal is successful
AND
In any case where the wording is ambiguous, the most favourable wording is what you get to use as a consumer. SO, again, you win. 
Hold fire. I really dont know what elser you can do right now anyway. 

This was your advice, it was completely wrong as I should have been ' carrying on' .  

nosferatu1001

It wasnt wrong given you had an appeal AND a LBA. this is a very very odd combo
But a LBA must be responded to. 
Keep digging. 

D_P_Dance

Not being funny nosferartu, but if you get a minute and read the 3 pages, every comment from you has been arrogant and wrong.

I find that difficult to believe,   I am a stickler for accuracy, (35 years in the Foreign Office),  I would say that he knows his onions inside out.  

If that is your opinion of The Count,  do you think thusly of all of us?  Is so I suggest you seek advice elsewhere, with the greatest possible respect, naturally.

Umkomaas

D_P_Dance said:

Not being funny nosferartu, but if you get a minute and read the 3 pages, every comment from you has been arrogant and wrong.

I find that difficult to believe,   I am a stickler for accuracy, (35 years in the Foreign Office),  I would say that he knows his onions inside out.  

If that is your opinion of The Count,  do you think thusly of all of us?  Is so I suggest you seek advice elsewhere, with the greatest possible respect, naturally.

Oops! 🤭

kevalicat

I don't think anything bad of any of you. He responded, in a wholly aggressive manner for whatever reason, and I thought I would let him know, that's it. I will say, he makes the workload of trying to get people off parking charges, sound like he's front line NHS!  Bit of a Drama Queen if you ask me.   

D_P_Dance

He responded, in a wholly aggressive manner 

I very much doubt if anyone here will agree.  perhaps you are being over-sensitive.