We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Minimum bedroom size - social housing
Options
Comments
-
Your attitude towards social housing tenants is disgusting and sad at the same time. All people should be able to hold their head up in society and not just feel grateful. Sounds like something out of Dickens.
So you would support someone who has housing but because it's not 'big enough' they should have a bigger one not through need? Entitled?
What about those people who literally have nothing, with only the clothes on their backs who get turned away because they don't have enough tick boxes to tick or points to get housing.
Hold your head up in society sure, but when your given the roof over your heads, what gives you the right to ask for more when there is no physical or mental need?
It's clear the OP wants their cake and eat, downgrading of their flat to pay less but still have 2 adults in a graded 1 bed house.
Couldn't be clear enough
HA don't give what they don't have
You give some people an inch they want a mile.
Things have clearly changed and this generation for the entitled.
What happened to working hard, being the first in your family to go to UNI/Apprenticeship, study hard, work hard and reap the rewards of your chosen profession to give back to your parents and those who supported you
Are you advocating, once in social housing, forever there, if there is no physical/mental disabilities? Where's the self betterment and the moving forward in life, than stuck in the endless cycle of social housing and relying on handouts and food banks, living from day to day, if you can why not?
If you have no physical/mental disabilities preventing this what's their excuse?."It is prudent when shopping for something important, not to limit yourself to Pound land/Estate Agents"
G_M/ Bowlhead99 RIP0 -
That is simply not true. You should do some research to learn how Housing Associations are funded. You would then be able to make a more cogent argument.
I googled it and it said Ministry of Housing, Communities and local government. So that is two examples of tax payers money. Ministry of Housing is tax payers and local government is also tax payers.
Then I found this.https://www.newstatesman.com/spotlight/housing/2018/03/investment-funds-have-found-new-cash-cow-social-housing Housing for vulnerable people as a private investment by a company.
Then this. Tax payers money again.
https://www.ft.com/content/cd0fdd1a-bbe4-11e8-8274-55b72926558f0 -
It's clear the OP wants their cake and eat, downgrading of their flat to pay less but still have 2 adults in a graded 1 bed house.
Unfortunately all respondents are !!!!!!s for not getting the OP a rent reduction/upgraded property0 -
-
For the last time, and I really mean the last time as frankly the level f hostility on this thread is insane.. but for the last time:
Flat is classed as a 2 bedroom flat
1 of the bedrooms is way below the legal minimum bedroom size so the flat should not be classed as a 2 bedroom flat.
There is NOTHING more to it.
All the "extra questions" are irrelevant to the 2 facts stated above. So I do not answer them as they are nothing to do with what I am asking about.
It really is that simple.
But nobody loos at the facts , everyone has a theory - amazing.
So please feel free to continue with your assumptions and conspiracy theories, some people clearly have an awful lot of time on their hands.
EDIT - Kentish Dave posts from last night when he said that I am trying to find a way to move my adult child into my bed (!!!) as well as dragging my posts from different parts of the MSE into here was deleted by admin. First completely sick, second completely irrelevant0 -
gettingready wrote: »For the last time, and I really mean the last time as frankly the level f hostility on this thread is insane.. but for the last time:
Flat is classed as a 2 bedroom flat
1 of the bedrooms is way below the legal minimum bedroom size so the flat should not be classed as a 2 bedroom flat.
There is NOTHING more to it.
All the "extra questions" are irrelevant to the 2 facts stated above.
It really is that simple.
But nobody loos at the facts , everyone has a theory - amazing.
So please feel free to continue with your conspiracy theories, some people clearly have an awful lot of time on your hands.
If you can get a bed in it then it is a bedroom. Have a look at some show houses for new builds and see what size (small) you can get a bed into.
If you can't get a bed in it then it isn't a bedroom. If your property has two rooms that can both contain beds then you have a two bedroom flat.0 -
gettingready wrote: »For the last time, and I really mean the last time as frankly the level f hostility on this thread is insane.. but for the last time:
Flat is classed as a 2 bedroom flat
1 of the bedrooms is way below the legal minimum bedroom size so the flat should not be classed as a 2 bedroom flat.
There is NOTHING more to it.
All the "extra questions" are irrelevant to the 2 facts stated above.
It really is that simple.
I’m afraid I still don’t understand what advice you are looking for. You are just making statements here, no questions.0 -
So you would support someone who has housing but because it's not 'big enough' they should have a bigger one not through need? Entitled?1
-
onwards&upwards wrote: »I’m afraid I still don’t understand what advice you are looking for. You are just making statements here, no questions.1
-
Thank you Norman, exactly that. Nothing else.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards