Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

A Question for Tory Supporters

Options
18788909293113

Comments

  • But he's a liar and a racist. Why should I believe him?

    What are "Zionists" who “having lived in this country for a very long time, probably all their lives, don’t understand English irony either"?

    Can you be born a Zionist? Jew-hater Jezza seems to think so.
  • buggy_boy
    buggy_boy Posts: 657 Forumite
    Moby wrote: »

    I dont think that really proves anything.. Its like rolling out loads of kids that didnt get abused by Jimmy Saville and saying see hes innocent.. Its a typical Corbyn Labour response to not actually deal with the issue.
  • Herzlos
    Herzlos Posts: 15,893 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    But he's a liar and a racist. Why should I believe him?


    What did he mean?
    Here's him explaining it.
    He's a liar.


    I don't know what you actually want here. Do you just want me to pretend he's an anti-Semite because you don't want to look at any evidence that says otherwise?
  • Moby
    Moby Posts: 3,917 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    buggy_boy wrote: »
    I dont think that really proves anything.. Its like rolling out loads of kids that didnt get abused by Jimmy Saville and saying see hes innocent.. Its a typical Corbyn Labour response to not actually deal with the issue.

    It shows that many Jews don't agree with the confected accusations against Corbyn. If you want to see real racism...watch channel 4 news undercover reporting tonight.
  • Arklight
    Arklight Posts: 3,182 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts
    Tories can't think of a single positive reason about why they're voting Tory on Thursday, can they? Just made up bile about Jeremy Corbyn.

    Jeremy Corbyn appears to be the only reason Tories can come up with to justify voting with their selfishness, their xenophobia, and their bitterness.

    I hope for your sakes you're as rich as you pretend to be, and when you're lying on a corridor floor waiting for a nurse to change your drip, you can phone Bupa, or whatever paid for health service the Americans say you can have.
  • Arklight
    Arklight Posts: 3,182 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts
    Tory Britain:

    COST-jack-Williment.jpg?w968
  • Arklight
    Arklight Posts: 3,182 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts
    More Tory lies. Conservatives forced into embarrassing climb down after, completely falsely, claiming a Labour protestor (angry about children having to lie on hospital floors thanks to Tory cuts) attacked them.

    One of them walked into his hand. It's so absurd even Laura Kuenssberg, not noticeably particularity anti conservative, tweeted the video.

    https://mobile.twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1204091610843226112?ref_url=file%3a%2f%2f%2fdata%2fdata%2fcom.guardian%2ffiles%2fpolitics%2f2019%2fdec%2f09%2fmatt-hancock-aide-altercation-hospital-campaign-visit
  • phillw
    phillw Posts: 5,665 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 9 December 2019 at 11:25PM
    And apparently we're "baaaad" because Rees-Mogg lounged around on the Commons' seats? or because BoJo is a brazen liar?

    Well there are far more reasons, but you might get upset if we mention them.
    what's worse? lying to the Queen about the prorogation? Or lying to the WORLD about WMDs? one has a far more destructive effect.

    Making excuses for standing politicians because retired politicians did something bad is worse. That might drive your prejudice, but it's completely irrelevant.
    But he is/was an IRA sympathiser.

    He sympathised with the politics, as anyone with a moral conscious would.

    The UK government authorised killing civilians that were protesting peacefully, I don't support violence but I can understand why they would resort to it. The conservatives have proved time and time again they can't cope with dealing with other countries without resorting to violence.

    Jeremy Corbyn is the ultimate pacifist, suggesting he supports the IRA is an outright bare faced lie.
    jimi_man wrote: »
    I do get the impression that there is a real 'closing your eyes to the obvious' about this whole anti-Semitism issue in the Labour party. A case of ignore it and deny it in the hope that it will go away.

    You can come up with any impression if you ignore facts.
    buggy_boy wrote: »
    Even though in 2011 he questioned Israels right to existence.. If you understand the history of the jewish community you will understand why this is so offensive..

    People are within their rights to be offended by anything they wish, but offending a jewish person doesn't make you anti-semetic. Israel was created by an act of war by the british empire. Half the people in the UK have lost their mind because the EU has forced us to clean up our beaches and treat people better, imagine what would happen if they took part of our country away from us?

    It's weird how hypocritical and contradictory conservative leavers are.

    Leave voters who say we should interfere in Hong Kong have no idea how crazy they sound.
  • Takedap
    Takedap Posts: 808 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper
    buggy_boy wrote: »

    In 2015 he questioned the "shoot to kill" policy of London met police, he has now changed his mind after the brave men and women of the met have responded to two terror attacks that have necessitated a "shoot to kill" policy to save lives, if he had been in power how many extra lives would have been lost?
    .

    You obviously don't understand the difference between a policy that allows the use of lethal force and a "shoot to kill" policy.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.