CPM boss James Randall off his trolley, DailyMail report

twhitehousescat

Altarf wrote: »

I am not arguing, just asking a genuine question - on a small residential or commercial site, how do you persuade people not to park where they shouldn't?

on a small residential : fit rising bollards with a automatic fob registered to vehicle


commercial site: barrier and attendant on entry , barrier to be closed/locked after working hours

Altarf

twhitehousescat wrote: »

buy a larger safe , place vauluable items inside and lock it


closest I can get to your question , I know nothing about land

I did place some tarmac in a safe once , is that close enough for you ?

Are you feeling ok, as those random words seem to indicate you have suffered some kind of head trauma.

beamerguy

Altarf wrote: »

I am not arguing, just asking a genuine question - on a small residential or commercial site, how do you persuade people not to park where they shouldn't?

Nobody knows, bar pointing a gun at them ?

Come up with an answer and you will earn a lot money

twhitehousescat

yes a headache trying to answer your ridiculous questions , that have very little to do with the topic

(leaves thread>

Altarf

twhitehousescat wrote: »

on a small residential : fit rising bollards with a automatic fob registered to vehicle


commercial site: barrier and attendant on entry , barrier to be closed/locked after working hours

Both of those solutions are far too expensive.

A rising bollard system will cost many thousands of pounds, and employing an attendant to protect 10 spaces would cost even more.

So what are the sensible solutions to enable people who need to park where there are a small number of spaces, that doesn't involve the innocent party in enormous expense?

twhitehousescat

dunno , <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

but remember , taking a photo of sa car that IS parked has not answered the question , and the truth be known , the PPC has failed in his contract to keep the land clear

perhaps if every landowner that used a PPC sued the PPc*** for every car that was on the land , then the PPC would remove cameras and put bodies on the ground

*** que Proserve

you heard of proserve?

Umkomaas

@Altarf. Fly-parkers are quickly eradicated, but in many instances landowner:PPC contracts are signed for 3 years. PPCs want a return on their investment. Who provides that return after all fly-parkers are gone?

Give me the answer to that, and there'll be another question coming your way.

Before that, how often do you read this forum, I note you have 2.7k posts on MSE, but don't recognise you as a regular (helpful) advisor here.

Altarf

twhitehousescat wrote: »

dunno , <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

but remember , taking a photo of sa car that IS parked has not answered the question , and the truth be known , the PPC has failed in his contract to keep the land clear

If you note, I never suggest that. Just asked what someone should do to persuade people who shouldn't be parking somewhere to not park there.

twhitehousescat wrote: »

perhaps if every landowner that used a PPC sued the PPc*** for every car that was on the land , then the PPC would remove cameras and put bodies on the ground

I fear you struggle with economics as you continue to suggest that employing an attendant is good value to protect 10 spaces.

beamerguy

Altarf wrote: »

If you note, I never suggest that. Just asked what someone should do to persuade people who shouldn't be parking somewhere to not park there.

I fear you struggle with economics as you continue to suggest that employing an attendant is good value to protect 10 spaces.

1: We do not know, come up the answer yourself and you have cracked it ...... wait to hear ?

2: As nobody knows and you don't know, an attendant is the best alternative. But if the economics do not suit, nothing you can do

twhitehousescat

Altarf wrote: »

If you note, I never suggest that. Just asked what someone should do to persuade people who shouldn't be parking somewhere to not park there.



I fear you struggle with economics as you continue to suggest that employing an attendant is good value to protect 10 spaces.

everyone should use the proserve approach , the BPA and IPC would cease to exist and the DVLA bankrupt

proserve method I say!