UKPS TNC Notice to keeper over 200 days later

twhitehousescat

you may find that TNC/Autisec will not go to court , latest email to me is stating that the DVLA have ACCEPTED that TNC PARKING have asked for details illigally using V888/2 , bith the DVLA and BPA are investigating this matter , however like other situations (MIL) expect an answer within the next 3 yrs

where ever possible on the recept of a TNC NTK do a POPLa appeal , to keep the paperwork flowing

I expect 2 names to be moving to the IPC shortly

Rich2316

That's the thing I appealed but the PPC just ignored it hoping I didn't know the code and the regs as most don't. Sending out debt collector letter NTK after years is so wrong they probably hope you have moved house So don't recieve anything so they can serve court action and win in your absence.

Topcat_147

Just had letter, Autosec have cancelled PCN. So keep into them. I am not dropping complaints with BPA and DVLA against Autosec and TNC.

twhitehousescat

told you they would drop out , BPA and DVLA on TNC,s case now , but you will never get an apology or explanation from them

bimma

ive sent my emails to david dunford, greg evans at dvla and aos @ BPA
with attachements of Notice to keeper, v888/2,the rejection letter and a pic of the postal envelope prooving when the NTK was posted.


Ive got till end of feb for POPLA so i can wait a week or so to
see what happens

bimma

this is the reply i got off the bpa

[FONT=&quot]Dear Mr .......[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Thank you for your email and attachments. [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]As a membership association, and not a regulatory body, we will investigate any complaints about alleged non-compliance with the points raised in BPA AOS Code and request further information from the parking operator concerned. However, [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]as the BPA is not a regulatory body the Code does not provide a way for a driver to challenge how a landowner or operator has applied parking control and enforcement on private land. [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]As we are not a regulator, a breach of a point raised in the Code does not mean that we have the authority to instruct a private parking operator to cancel a charge. [/FONT][FONT=&quot]If an appeal is rejected by the parking operator, the motorist may have recourse to the independent appeals service known as POPLA (Parking On Private Land Appeals) if eligible. From the attached, we note that the parking operator has provided you with a POPLA verification Code, and so would advise that as you wish to contest the charge further, that you continue the appeals process with POPLA. Please visit www.popla.co.uk for details of how to continue this process. [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]As a membership association we also do not have the authority to address issues relating to information provided by The DVLA (and or their processes), The Data Protection Act or accusations of fraudulent activity. These matters should be brought to the attention of the relevant organisations to enable further investigation. [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]It is not mandatory that an operator uses POFA when issuing a parking charge notice. There is no legal requirement to do so. It is the decision of the individual parking company as to whether they choose to utilise POFA (2012). If no mention of POFA (2012) is made on the parking charge notice the strict timescales as advised in Schedule 4 are not therefore applicable.[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]With regard to the wording of the rejection notification, we can bring this to the attention of the parking operator.[/FONT][FONT=&quot] If any non-compliance is found as part of the investigation process the operator will be required to deal with any issues raised and to provide satisfactory evidence of this having been done. [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]We will contact the parking operator in connection to the wording of the rejection notification, and upon response we will be in touch. Thank you for your patience whilst this matter is being looked into. [/FONT]



so basically...we cant be bothered to do anything...and most likely dvla will reply same

so if they dont use POFA it doesnt matter....?? does that mean there is keeper liability or not?

twhitehousescat

you have been fobbed off !

bimma

looks like it

i sent in the evidence and pointed out the issues in bullit point form same as my post on page 3. so couldnt be any clearer

so where do i stand now?

whats the chance of winning the popla stage of appeal.based on what ive said so far,notice to keeper non compliant with pofa, no keeper liability etc

so just because they dont use POFA in the PCN makes it ok to breach all rules in POFA? and therefore chase the registered keeper

twhitehousescat

do you "actually" think autosec will bring this to court?

it looks like the ranks have closed , so much for the protection of the DVLA and the BPA do your best with a POPLa appeal , they can only go after the driver , crusify them with the TNC thing (v888/2) , I have a funny feeling they will not produce a reply , and will back down at popla

they had 9 popla cases last year , all 9 were allowed ,

bimma

do you "actually" think autosec will bring this to court?

im confused, original NTDriver was from UK parking solutions and NTK from TNC