Bw legal and excel

Umkomaas

Umkomaas you said to send copies of the tickets, hence i reworded my reply. However from reading the other threads, if i gave them an excuse or a reason they are more likely to pick me to go further??

If your tickets prove your case, why do you think showing these would single you out for further action?

If this does get to court you can't in the middle of the hearing scratch around and pull these out of your pocket like Paul Daniels with a rabbit :EasterBun (or Debbie McGee with her's for that matter ).

Anything you are to rely on must be shown before the case, AFAIUI.

Redx

frankly, I think they will pick all of you to "go further"

all this LBC stuff is a prelude to the main event , the MCOL, which they are issuing in droves

its like 2 stags bellowing and pawing the ground and pppp ing on it before they butt horns in the rut

the whole point of these exchanges is that they would be used in court as EVIDENCE on PAPER , as Judge Rinder would say , its part of the paper trail and as umkomaas says above, all the evidence being relied on needs to be shown beforehand or in the initial exchanges, or be referred to for the main event later on

BW LEGAL are just using templates and mish mashes of copy and paste and I am convinced they dont read what people send them, or the details of the case itself

as for your letter above , loads of spelling mistakes in it, so at least run a spell checker on it to make it look "professional"

luksakura

Redx and umkomass.

Thank you for sending me the extra links. I feel that my first rebuttal letter was not acknowledge as i dont appear to have had the same chain of letter that others have recieved. My letter is a reduction in price, no mention of prevoius cases ie elliot v loake. ( appears to be the same route as prevoius attempts)

Umkomaas you said to send copies of the tickets, hence i reworded my reply. However from reading the other threads, if i gave them an excuse or a reason they are more likely to pick me to go further??

I have removed the part about the tickets and reverted to the original 2nd response letter.


Dear Sir/ Madam,

I write to you with regard to your letter dated ....

First, I must point out that I have replied to you on .... I enclose a copy of the orignal communcation and proof it has been received.

Again. This charge is disputed and consider this matter now closed. I therefore request you refer this matter back to your client and cease and desist all contact with me.

Additionally, I never consented yo my details being shared by Excel and I revoke any permission they may have incorrectly given to you.

The SRA were copied in my previous response and are also copied into this reply.

Yours faithfully.


The original was a gan one that coupon mad okayed as it was short and to the point.

The last thing i want to do is p off the people who are helping me, i am happy to write complaint letters etc to help build up the numbers to get these investigated.

Thank you again cor your support.

luksakura

Yes sorry about the spelling mistakes. I have no access to a laptop or pc at home and im reliant entirely on my phone hence some nights i keep going round in circles on different forums and i appear to be posting the same post twice.

I will send a copy of my evidence if this helps my case. My draft will be email from my phone to my work so i can re type as a word document in the correct format.

I will try and get to work early in the morning and play around until i get something right.

Thank you.

luksakura

I have posted my reply with evidence of the tickets. Only to return home to the 2nd letter. The one refering to elliot and loake and only allowing 7 days to respond before the "we shall take our clients unstructions in regard to issuing court proceedings for the balance"

What do i do now?? Wait for a response from my letter before replying. Or reply to this letter as well?

Advice greatly appreciated.

Thanks

Grimble

Include in any letter you look forward to seeing their forensic evidence as in the case of EvL and if not forthcoming you will inform the SRA.

luksakura

Anyone know a good link for a sra complaint for the std second letter from bw Legal. I thought i found one the other day but could find the page when i went to print it out.

The_Deep

Read this


http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.php?t=5516670


it links to Gan letter

luksakura

Further to our letter dated 19 July 2016 where we requested that you either pay the Balance in 111 or provide your
detailed grounds for disputing the PCN, by 4 August 2016, we are yet to receive payment and/or a response to our
letter,
Please pay the Balance by 15 September 2016 to prevent legal action from being taken. For the avoidance of doubt
the Balance relates to the £100.00 parking charge and £54.00 for our client's initial legal fees. which were detailed
in the car park terms and conditions.
County Court Proceedings
As we have previously brought to your attention. In the event County Court proceedings are issued. we will be
seeking recovery of not only the Balance but our client's court fees, further solicitor's costs and statutory interest
which are estimated to be the following:

Principal debt + initial legal costs£154

Estimated interest £38.38

Estimated court fees £25

Estimated solicitors costs £50

Estimated total £267.38


We also wish to bring to your attention the case of ParkingEye Limited v Beavis[2015] UKSC 67 in which the
Supreme Court held that parking charges serve a legitimate commercial interest and are neither extravagant nor
unconscionable. This case eliminates the main defence that you may have should the matter go to Court and this
case will be relied upon, by our client, in any County Court proceedings.
You should also note that if your claim has already been processed through an Independent Appeal Service ("IAS")
and an IAS has dismissed your appeal, then it is likely that a County Court will come to a similar conclusion and
your defence will be unsuccessful.


We also wish to bring to your attention the case of ParkingEye Limited v Beavis[2015]UKSC 67 in which the
Supreme Court held that parking charges serve a legitimate commercial interest and are neither extravagant nor
unconscionable. This case eliminates the main defence that you may have should the matter go to Court and this
case will be relied upon, by our client, in any County Court proceedings.
You should also note that ifyour claim has already been processed through an Independent Appeal Service ("JAS")
and an IAS has dismissed your appeal, then it is likely that a County Court will come to a similar conclusion and
your defence will be unsuccessful.
1r our client successfully obtains a County Court Judgment ("CCJ") against you(which is likely), then a CCJ will
be recorded on your credit file for 6 years unless you satisfy thc CCJ in full within a month of thc CCJ being
entered, A CCJ on your credit file may affect your ability to obtain future credit and may affect your employability.


Jfyou fail Lo comply with thc CCJ order we reserve the right to take one of the following enforcement actions to
recover this debt:
· Warrant of Control: A County Court BailifFvisiting you at your home.
· Attachment of Earnings: Your employer may be ordered to deduct payinents from your wages.
· Order to A« end Court For Questioning: You being ordered to attend Court to disclose your financial
circumstances.
In allowing you the opportunity to make representations and/or pay the Balance before proceedings being
issued, our Client has complied with the guidelines under the Independent Parking Committee Code ofpractlce
cthe Code") and its obligations under the Civil Procedure Rules ("CPR"). All previous correspondence in this
matter will be brought to the attention ofthe Court should this point be raised.
What You Need To Do Now
To avoid proceedings being commenced and thc above additional fecs, costs and estimated interest being incurred,
wc request you pay the Balance by 15 September 2016.
We have attached to this letter(once again) our"How to make payment"document, which details thc ways in
which you can pay thc Balance. In thc event we do not r cccivc pnymcnl of the Balance by 15 ScptenTbcr 2016, we
place you on notice that we will commence legal proceedings for thc recovery of the Balance without further
notice.
Ifyou nre unable to pay thc Balance mimcdiately, please Call us today on 01133234479 to discuss this matter
with onc of our helpful team. Our tcarn can set up an affordable payment arrangement for you that matches your current financial circumstances.!



Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.

luksakura

Hi guys. I have recievd the above in the post today. This will now be my 4th letter. I will respond with another Gan letter explaining my position has not changed since my 1st letter.

Its pretty obvoius they are not looking at this case by case. 3 complaints have been made to the sra. In which ive received one reply, the other 2 i only sent last week so i would expect to see a reply later next week.

Any pointers in what to put to my next letter to the sra. Other than drawing a picture of me shrugging my shoulders as bw legal dig there hole deeper???

Do i have enough grounds to say harrsment now? i feel like i can counter claim for my loss in life hours repling to there nonsensical letters.

I have not yet complained to the CSA. Does anyone have any pointers on what to put in that letter. I want to say enough, but not too much so they can come to a non bias opinion of bw legals actions.

Any advice greatly recieved.