We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
large booking at restaurant- how to split the bill?
Comments
-
Homeownertobe wrote: »But you're not in the same position as others. You've been going on about that for what seems like decades.
And yes, though I've been back a while, you'll be horrified to know I had the most expensive item on the menu. A whole £8.
Not including the beers.;)
You are mistaking us for someone who cares what you paid - which shows you've missed the whole point of this thread. You are the one getting your knickers in a knot over what other people think......Most people don't view eating out that way .I Would Rather Climb A Mountain Than Crawl Into A Hole
MSE Florida wedding .....no problem0 -
moneyistooshorttomention wrote: »Okay go on then - and I'm not going to say just what I've noticed my neighbours getting up to (as I havent "kept quiet" about it)....and has anyone else noticed neighbours "getting up to summat" and, if so, what did they do about it? Owt or nowt?:)
Do you mean those neighbours with pampas grass in the middle of their front lawns?0 -
Person_one wrote: »That might be the most random tangential post of the whole thread, and that's saying something!
Just be grateful you aren't her neighbourIts not that we have more patience as we grow older, its just that we're too tired to care about all the pointless drama0 -
Feral_Moon wrote: »Do you mean those neighbours with pampas grass in the middle of their front lawns?
Okays - you'll have to explain that reference please:)
It's not some modern take on the box of "OMO" prominently displayed on outward-facing kitchen windowsill (as in "Old Man Out") from days of yore is it?:rotfl:0 -
If only one or two people are having starters and everyone else is waiting for the main course, those one or two people are going to feel some pressure to eat quicker than they would have done had everyone had a starter.
That would put me off ordering a starter if no-one else was doing so. I wouldn't want to be the one delaying everyone else getting fed.I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.0 -
If only one or two people are having starters and everyone else is waiting for the main course, those one or two people are going to feel some pressure to eat quicker than they would have done had everyone had a starter.
That would put me off ordering a starter if no-one else was doing so. I wouldn't want to be the one delaying everyone else getting fed.
I also think there's been some deliberate confusion between what happens when eating out in a large group and what happens when eating out with 1 or 2 other people. Despite some people emphasising that they're talking about the latter situation, others keep dragging it back to the former, totally different, situation.0 -
moneyistooshorttomention wrote: »Okays - you'll have to explain that reference please:)
It's not some modern take on the box of "OMO" prominently displayed on outward-facing kitchen windowsill (as in "Old Man Out") from days of yore is it?:rotfl:
Not quite :rotfl:
Google "pampas grass front garden"0 -
missbiggles1 wrote: »I also think there's been some deliberate confusion between what happens when eating out in a large group and what happens when eating out with 1 or 2 other people. Despite some people emphasising that they're talking about the latter situation, others keep dragging it back to the former, totally different, situation.
Your solution to stopping your meal from being "ruined" seems to be to force people to order more food than they want. How is this better? You still have people not eating while others are - just that they now have a full plate of food in front of them that they don't want, rather than having them patiently wait for the next course.
Would people seriously prefer me to order and waste a plate of food just so that they can feel better about the amount that they are eating themselves?0 -
moneyistooshorttomention wrote: »Okays - you'll have to explain that reference please:)
It's not some modern take on the box of "OMO" prominently displayed on outward-facing kitchen windowsill (as in "Old Man Out") from days of yore is it?:rotfl:
Pampas grass in your front garden is a sign to say 'Swingers live here'(AKA HRH_MUngo)
Member #10 of £2 savers club
Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology: Terry Eagleton0 -
seven-day-weekend wrote: »Pampas grass in your front garden is a sign to say 'Swingers live here'Feral_Moon wrote: »Google "pampas grass front garden"0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards