We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The New Fat Scotland 'Thanks for all the Fish' Thread.
Comments
-
Big exam went fine thanks for asking .... have u been looking me up ? Oh my I will get all shy
.. no need to inform me about projection though I have studied psychology amongst many other things ... but if it makes u feel better
However I will leave the personal insults to yourself you manage them so very well0 -
And aren't some people rubbing their hands in glee at this^^^
Champing at the bit for the opportunity to vent their hate, grudge, and offence at their fellow Scots; none of it with any justification.
And you people regard yourselves as patriotic?
Pathetic.
See this sounds as if your awfy angry to me ... maybe your not but you do sound it ... this was what I was referring to
Or are you just projecting I wonder
So I spose it was really you that started it
But hey let's move on and cheer up ... Scotland is looking towards a great future0 -
Big exam went fine thanks for asking .... have u been looking me up ? Oh my I will get all shy
.. no need to inform me about projection though I have studied psychology amongst many other things ... but if it makes u feel better
However I will leave the personal insults to yourself you manage them so very well
Are you serious?!
You were going on about studying for your "big exam" several pages ago.
Moving on......:)0 -
I apologise ... I didn't read back several pages and know I put it elsewhere on mse ... this isn't the only thread I contribute to ... I forget exactly where I write everything0
-
davomcdave wrote: »Some of my best friends are English!
Scotland historically did vote Conservative. In the 50s they were getting a 50% share and in the 60s they were getting a third. Are you seriously trying to suggest that Scots reject free markets and individual freedoms in favour of the jackboot and nanny-statism? One of the great things about both Ruth Davidson and Theresa May is that they give a powerful voice to modern Conservative ideology.
I thought this was a particularly good piece:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/02/17/ruth-davidson-gay-working-class-bull-riding-outspoken-scotand/
(paywall)
Loving your fantasy Conservative party in 1950's Scotland scenario. The Conservative party didn't exist in Scotland in the 1950's.The modern Scottish Conservative Party was established in 1965 with the merger of the Unionist Party into the Conservative Party of England and Wales.The origins of the Scottish Unionist Party lie in the 1886 split of the British Liberal Party with the emergence of the Liberal Unionists under Joseph Chamberlain. The 'Union' in question was the 1800 Irish Union, not that of 1707.
So no, Tories weren't getting votes in Scotland in the 1950s. The Unionist party were. Some members had even broken off to form another party earlier...This seam in the Scottish Unionist Party's belief system was demonstrated when members of the party left to establish the Scottish Party, which eventually merged with the National Party of Scotland to form the Scottish National Party. It also explains what may at first seem a paradoxical statement by John Buchan, who as a Scottish Unionist MP stated, "I believe every Scotsman should be a Scottish nationalist." [2]
While the Scottish party may have been linked on a Parliamentary level with the Conservative and Unionist Party in England and Wales, it was conscious that it had to appeal to the liberal tradition in Scotland and studiously avoided using the term "Conservative".[1]It all seems so stupid it makes me want to give up.
But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid ?0 -
Splitting hairs. Unionist MPs in Scotland took the Conservative whip just as their counterparts in Ulster used to do. If you look at election results pre-1965, you will see that Scottish Unionist MPs were even counted as conservatives.
Enjoy the history lesson.0 -
Shakethedisease wrote: »..And the Union in Unionist Party was referring to Ireland.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unionist_Party_(Scotland) ...
And your cited source clearly states;
After the official 1912 merger of Liberal Unionists and Conservatives in Britain as the 'Conservative and Unionist Party', the Scottish Unionist Party emerged as effectively the Conservative Party in Scotland
You should have taken the time to read it. Then you would have received a 'history lesson'.
I am getting more and more convinced that you must be a unionist troll.:rotfl:
So no, Tories weren't getting votes in Scotland in the 1950s. The Unionist party were. Some members had even broken off to form another party earlier...
Enjoy the history lesson. Oh and the fact that Ruth Davidson also studiously avoids using the term 'Conservative' at election time. There's a recurring theme in there for you somewhere.[/QUOTE]0 -
One thing is for sure regardless what you call the Conservative Party back in the 50s they were getting votes, whereas the SNP weren't and with a bit of luck we will return to that position in the very near future.0
-
Splitting hairs. Unionist MPs in Scotland took the Conservative whip just as their counterparts in Ulster used to do. If you look at election results pre-1965, you will see that Scottish Unionist MPs were even counted as conservatives.
Enjoy the history lesson.
They represented and courted votes in the Scottish central belt from Protestant voters on broadly sectarian grounds and their peak in the 1950's coincided with peak membership of the Church of Scotland/the Kirk. Also weirdly, they were also seen as representing Scottish interests from a perspective that the Labour party then were too London centric.lest it alienate what small but wealthy middle and upper class Catholic support it had, this appeal was projected through the endorsement and promotion of well known Church of Scotland members like John Buchan, or prominent Orangemen in areas of west and central Scotland where the Orange Lodge had strong support.
Being an independent Scottish party also drew electoral appeal when set against the threat of a London-based centralising British Labour party.The decline of strictly Protestant associations, and the loss of its Protestant working-class base, spelled the erosion of the Unionist vote. Though many Conservatives would still identify with the Kirk, most members of the established Church of Scotland did not identify themselves as Conservatives.
No Conservative party existed in Scotland in the 1950's. The Unionist party went on to merge with the Conservative Party because their core voters were all switching to Labour. The merged party never managed to ever regain a majority of votes in Scotland from then onwards. Only ever managing around half the Labour MP's at their peak and 0 to 1 MP's from about 1997 onwards and today.
Enjoy your more in depth history lesson.It all seems so stupid it makes me want to give up.
But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid ?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards