The New Fat Scotland 'Thanks for all the Fish' Thread.

foxtrotoscar_2

Shakethedisease wrote: »

You're splitting hairs and I can't be bothered with your boring insults. We can all see what the Tory party in Scotland is trying to do in it's recent leafleting campaigns.. and it isn't exactly shouting vote Tory. It's shouting 'VOTE RUTH DAVIDSONS CANDIDATE'.

You have demonstrably lied yet again as you have done in the past..it's really quite that simple Shakey. You have no credibility on your own thread

zagubov

NCC-1701 wrote: »

Both those leaflets contain the words 'Scottish Conservative' in the header. Why do continually feel the need to not be truthful?

It's a well-known fact that the general public read small print much more easily than large bold font titles.

That's why drug companies always label their medicines with their terrible side-effects and put their positive effects in tiny paper inserts inside their packages.

Therefore parents dose their sick children with liver failure inducing tablets because the small print mentions they may reduce fever and pain during infant infections.

Or unlike the Tories, do even the much-maligned drug companies do it other way round? :whistle:

mollycat

zagubov wrote: »

It's a well-known fact that the general public read small print much more easily than large bold font titles.

That's why drug companies always label their medicines with their terrible side-effects and put their positive effects in tiny paper inserts inside their packages.

Therefore parents dose their sick children with liver failure inducing tablets because the small print mentions they may reduce fever and pain during infant infections.

Or unlike the Tories, do even the much-maligned drug companies do it other way round? :whistle:

There's the metropolitan elite writ large for you; openly admitting they think the rest of us are unable to read leaflets properly.

elantan

theres an indy march tomorrow and a unionist march the following Saturday, should be interesting to compare turnouts and behaviours, and according to the national secret polling is going on, ordered by WM government, wonder when/ if we get to find out the results

loadsacash

elantan wrote: »

theres an indy march tomorrow and a unionist march the following Saturday, should be interesting to compare turnouts and behaviours, and according to the national secret polling is going on, ordered by WM government, wonder when/ if we get to find out the results

There are loads of opinion polls about Scottish Independence. The Westminster Government and the Scottish Government do them regularly


I wont be doing any marches any time soon I have better things to do!

Hunter_Jaeger

Tromking wrote: »

free tuition fees

How is that working?

Scottish students are being shafted.

Scottish Universities are capping undergraduate enrollment for Scottish students to increase revenue from RUK and overseas.

On some courses less than 10% of Scottish applicants will be offered a place.

Hunter_Jaeger

elantan wrote: »

theres an indy march tomorrow and a unionist march the following Saturday, should be interesting to compare turnouts and behaviours, and according to the national secret polling is going on, ordered by WM government, wonder when/ if we get to find out the results

So you now want independence to be decided on the turnout at marches?

Mind you I suppose that is how it started in Germany in the 20s........that didn't end well :cool:

elantan

loadsacash wrote: »

There are loads of opinion polls about Scottish Independence. The Westminster Government and the Scottish Government do them regularly


I wont be doing any marches any time soon I have better things to do!

neither will I... so your point is ?

I'm thinking your trying to pre-empt the low turnout for the unionist side

elantan

Hunter_Jaeger wrote: »

So you now want independence to be decided on the turnout at marches?

Mind you I suppose that is how it started in Germany in the 20s........that didn't end well :cool:

did I say that ?

please point out exactly where I said that, otherwise do be a dear and go haiver elsewhere

Hunter_Jaeger

elantan wrote: »

did I say that ?

No you did not.

You implied it though didn't you! Just another attempt at muddying the waters.

Mind you your guns are now spiked you can't really start harping on about attendance figures without looking a fool.

elantan wrote: »

otherwise do be a dear and go haiver elsewhere

Oh I didn't realise I needed to be a Nat to respond in this thread :rotfl::rotfl: