MSE News: Hotpoint tumble dryer help: 3 extra tricks to get you a refund

Zandoni

unholyangel wrote: »

Lets say theoretically hotpoints share of fires is not disproportionate to their market share. Theoretically, their machines might be as dangerous as any other brand with this fault but safer without it. Its much better to spend millions in limiting your liability than it is to spend millions in lawsuits and legal fees. We just don't know enough details to accurately speculate, much less state it as true.

But to apply the same logic, surely if they were that dangerous, they'd be compelled to recall and refund/replace rather than being allowed to carry out their voluntary recall repair/replace programme?

Ah yes, me saying your posts are making me laugh is definitely not adult because adults never laugh, especially when faced with absurdity. We are required to be serious and solemn at all times and must never crack a smile. My bad.

Where's the link????

unholyangel

Zandoni wrote: »

Where's the link????

Didn't you say you were an adult? We've been over this more times than the cow has the moon.

Zandoni

unholyangel wrote: »

Didn't you say you were an adult? We've been over this more times than the cow has the moon.

We have and you refuse to give the link that backs up your comment.

unholyangel

Zandoni wrote: »

We have and you refuse to give the link that backs up your comment.

I haven't refused. I made it conditional upon you supplying the links requested of you. Not quite sure I understand your logic. You're apparently unable to understand why I wouldn't ask "how high?" when you say jump.

The mere fact you've been posting with sometimes distorted views while demanding everyone else must provide irrefutable evidence that leaves no doubt as to its meaning and specifically matches everything you said word for word has led me to take the stance I have.

I'll show you mine....if you show me yours.

JReacher1

unholyangel wrote: »

I haven't refused. I made it conditional upon you supplying the links requested of you. Not quite sure I understand your logic. You're apparently unable to understand why I wouldn't ask "how high?" when you say jump.

The mere fact you've been posting with sometimes distorted views while demanding everyone else must provide irrefutable evidence that leaves no doubt as to its meaning and specifically matches everything you said word for word has led me to take the stance I have.

I'll show you mine....if you show me yours.

You're being very childish.

If you've got this "which" report link why don't you post it? That would bring this argument to a close and stop the pair of you hijacking the thread with your petty squabbles.

Although it's been quite amusing it seems that you could end this whole argument by posting this link (which you say you have).

It's very strange that you won't post it

Zandoni

unholyangel wrote: »

I haven't refused. I made it conditional upon you supplying the links requested of you. Not quite sure I understand your logic. You're apparently unable to understand why I wouldn't ask "how high?" when you say jump.

The mere fact you've been posting with sometimes distorted views while demanding everyone else must provide irrefutable evidence that leaves no doubt as to its meaning and specifically matches everything you said word for word has led me to take the stance I have.

I'll show you mine....if you show me yours.

You made a specific statement quoting Which as a source so it is not unreasonable to ask for a link to it. It's very bad practice on a forum to not show links to web sites you quote from.

The stuff you are asking of me was resolved way back, you have only brought it up again as a diversion tactic.

So once again I ask, please may I see the link?

unholyangel

JReacher1 wrote: »

You're being very childish.

If you've got this "which" report link why don't you post it? That would bring this argument to a close and stop the pair of you hijacking the thread with your petty squabbles.

Although it's been quite amusing it seems that you could end this whole argument by posting this link (which you say you have).

It's very strange that you won't post it

Its very strange Zandoni could post his and get the links he seems to want so desperately but won't.

Its also very childish how he keeps harping on about it despite me having made my position crystal clear. Can you really blame me for having some fun with it?

You're both very quick to jump on me for not bowing to the latest demand of many. Yet not so quick to jump on zandoni despite him not having posted even 1 link to back up what he's said. Funny that, isnt it?

unholyangel

Zandoni wrote: »

You made a specific statement quoting Which as a source so it is not unreasonable to ask for a link to it. It's very bad practice on a forum to not show links to web sites you quote from.

The stuff you are asking of me was resolved way back, you have only brought it up again as a diversion tactic.

So once again I ask, please may I see the link?

Can you please provide links to back up your statement? Can't have one rule for you and another for everyone else now, can we?

JReacher1

unholyangel wrote: »

Its very strange Zandoni could post his and get the links he seems to want so desperately but won't.

Its also very childish how he keeps harping on about it despite me having made my position crystal clear. Can you really blame me for having some fun with it?

You're both very quick to jump on me for not bowing to the latest demand of many. Yet not so quick to jump on zandoni despite him not having posted even 1 link to back up what he's said. Funny that, isnt it?

So you don't have a link?

Why do you keep on referencing something that you don't have?

It makes you look foolish.

Zandoni

unholyangel wrote: »

Its very strange Zandoni could post his and get the links he seems to want so desperately but won't.

Its also very childish how he keeps harping on about it despite me having made my position crystal clear. Can you really blame me for having some fun with it?

You're both very quick to jump on me for not bowing to the latest demand of many. Yet not so quick to jump on zandoni despite him not having posted even 1 link to back up what he's said. Funny that, isnt it?

It's not funny at all, people think it's very strange that you refuse to comply with a simple request. It's also not fair to overtake this thread with your pettiness.

all the respect I had for your legal knowledge has now disappeared.