We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
If we vote for Brexit what happens
Comments
-
TrickyTree83 wrote: »Can we please all stop using backdoor BS to try and spin this any other way than what it actually was?
You can call it whatever you want but it is a simple fact that the majority of the UK population did not vote to leave the EU.Every generation blames the one before...
Mike + The Mechanics - The Living Years0 -
Frankly any over riding decision from Brexit in our democracy is a good thing cause it is absolute and total madness to have voted out in the first place. Stop it at all costs.Remember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.0
-
MobileSaver wrote: »Point of order: It was actually a minority of the country who voted to leave the EU...
And it was a minority of the country who voted to join (or actually - remain) in the EC in 1975 also.
So to use your own argument, we should never have been in the EC in the first place.0 -
MobileSaver wrote: »You can call it whatever you want but it is a simple fact that the majority of the UK population did not vote to leave the EU.
They did because abstention doesn't count towards anything under UK law on referenda.
The AV referendum was under a 50% turnout, it wasn't deemed invalid, we appear to have nothing that invalidates the result of the referendum.
So if abstentions do not count towards any outcome then the only two outcomes you can count are the two options on the ballot. In which case Leave had a majority.0 -
Any decent MP if the vote goes to parliament, should vote in the way his constituency voted in the referendum
Of the voting area's - 270 voted leave, 129 voted remain, so the majority of MP's should also vote leave0 -
I'm finding the outcry around this a bit bizarre anyway, it seems odd for so many who campaigned to Leave the EU, with one of the main listed reasons being that we needed to take back power for our parliament, are now hugely opposed to our parliament being involved in such a massive decision.
Relatively small numbers of MPs are likely to come out as being fully opposed invoking Article 50 anyway, realistically if you represent a seat which voted Leave, in a country which voted Leave, you would struggle to justify outright opposition to invoking Article 50, but equally many in Parliament will clearly much more information and input on the process and negotiations than the government wants to give them ( I see Keir Starmer is already taking this line for Labour today).
I don't see an issue on that, this is a massive decision, we are a parliamentary democracy and the current PM has very little personal mandate given she wasn't in charge at the last election when the Tories won a narrow majority.0 -
ruggedtoast wrote: »Er, no. Democracy is predicated on lobbying for changes in policy.
Fascism is that the majority bullies the minority into acquiescence regardless of how wrong they are.
I appreciate, being a UKIP member, that you aren't terribly understanding of the difference.
Indeed, I do not understand how you think democracy should work: it does seem to the assume an absolute 'right or wrong', irrespective of what the majority vote for.0 -
I'm finding the outcry around this a bit bizarre anyway, it seems odd for so many who campaigned to Leave the EU, with one of the main listed reasons being that we needed to take back power for our parliament, are now hugely opposed to our parliament being involved in such a massive decision.
Relatively small numbers of MPs are likely to come out as being fully opposed invoking Article 50 anyway, realistically if you represent a seat which voted Leave, in a country which voted Leave, you would struggle to justify outright opposition to invoking Article 50, but equally many in Parliament will clearly much more information and input on the process and negotiations than the government wants to give them ( I see Keir Starmer is already taking this line for Labour today).
I don't see an issue on that, this is a massive decision, we are a parliamentary democracy and the current PM has very little personal mandate given she wasn't in charge at the last election when the Tories won a narrow majority.
I don't think anyone would begrudge parliament being involved in the process if the ultimate goal was set in stone that the result will be upheld and we will leave.
That parliament should be involved in what leave looks like seems reasonable to me if that's not going to be put to the public also.
What I hate seeing and probably what others who also voted leave will also hate is the pandemic of whooping and hollering by those who vehemently want to remain who see this as an opportunity to usurp the referendum result, which it absolutely should not be.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards