If we vote for Brexit what happens

CLAPTON

Ballard wrote: »

True. I was livid yesterday but I'm over it now and I won't see their posts anymore so my blood pressure should be fine.

some-one who loses an argument solves the issue by resolutely never ever listening to any contrary views again.
and the fool is proud to announce his brilliance to the world.

mayonnaise

Ballard wrote: »

True. I was livid yesterday but I'm over it now and I won't see their posts anymore so my blood pressure should be fine.

The best way to deal with cases like clapton is the 'talk to the hand' approach as illustrated below.

prosaver

Masomnia wrote: »

I think you'll find Cameron was campaigning for Remain.

sorry I meant remain. urrggg
just realized biggest lie of the leave campaign..
During the campaign, Prime Minister David Cameron said he would go to Brussels immediately after the referendum to trigger Article 50.
that was part of the deal and no one from the remain campaign objected, now, because they lost and had too go to a high court. sore looses.

kabayiri

Carl31 wrote: »

could be interesting....

How to make your country lose confidence in democracy in one swoop

Even if this works out in either sides favour, surely this makes a mockery of what was offered to the people?

The elephant in the room is the rise in the popularity of UKIP. Everyone knows this.

UKIP are trying their very best to self destruct, and yet they attract large voting numbers in the North of England.

It just shows you the poor quality of political choice in this country.

Some political types will spin up the fact that large numbers of voters were ignored, either way.

We just have increasingly polarised politics. It's just the same in the USA.

Masomnia

prosaver wrote: »

sorry I meant remain. urrggg
just realized biggest lie of the leave campaign..
During the campaign, Prime Minister David Cameron said he would go to Brussels immediately after the referendum to trigger Article 50.
that was part of the deal and no one from the remain campaign objected, now, because they lost and had too go to a high court. sore looses.

I did wonder! I wouldn't have put it past some of the posters on here for claiming it was a leave lie that Cameron would stick to his word

ruggedtoast

Carl31 wrote: »

could be interesting....

How to make your country lose confidence in democracy in one swoop

Even if this works out in either sides favour, surely this makes a mockery of what was offered to the people?

And what was offered to the people? £350 million a week for the NHS, a unicorn in every driveway, and a lot of other complete and utter lies.

ruggedtoast

CLAPTON wrote: »

some-one who loses an argument solves the issue by resolutely never ever listening to any contrary views again.
and the fool is proud to announce his brilliance to the world.

Yep, and you announce your brilliance multiple times a day, every day, right here for all to see.

:rotfl:

CLAPTON

ruggedtoast wrote: »

And what was offered to the people? £350 million a week for the NHS, a unicorn in every driveway, and a lot of other complete and utter lies.

you really do have a deep hatred and disdain for the people of the UK simply because they disagree with you.

mayonnaise

If not appealed and reversed, will this need to go through the House of Lords also?

wotsthat

kabayiri wrote: »

The elephant in the room is the rise in the popularity. Everyone knows this.

UKIP are trying their very best to self destruct, and yet they attract large voting numbers in the North of England.

It just shows you the poor quality of political choice in this country.

Some political types will spin up the fact that large numbers of voters were ignored, either way.

We just have increasingly polarised politics. It's just the same in the USA.

We just need to work through it. A referendum asking a binary question where the country is split 50:50 can be nothing else but polarising.

The government has to carry out the will of the people but they also need to act legally.