We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Class action against parking companies?
Comments
-
G24 are between 42.8% and 71.4% more expensive for their speculative invoice versus the council's legally-enforceable penalty charge. The only similarity is that the amount goes up after the swift payment bribe period ends.
0 -
Dont forget to tune in to the today programe on BBC Raidio4 tomorrow morning, it could be very entertainingPPCs say its carpark management, BPA say its raising standards..... we all know its just about raking in the revenue. :eek:0
-
It's been postponed, now on Friday instead.Dont forget to tune in to the today programe on BBC Raidio4 tomorrow morning, it could be very entertaining
I have been providing assistance, including Lay Representation at Court hearings (current score: won 57, lost 14), to defendants in parking cases for over 5 years. I have an LLB (Hons) degree, and have a Graduate Diploma in Civil Litigation from CILEx. However, any advice given on these forums by me is NOT formal legal advice, and I accept no liability for its accuracy.0 -
Thanx Bargepole, roll on friday ((:PPCs say its carpark management, BPA say its raising standards..... we all know its just about raking in the revenue. :eek:0
-
Well, young Michael has appeared on BBC South East this evening, with input from MSE's Guy Anker and old smarmy pants himself (although the credits for the two have been transposed - sure Guy won't be too pleased he's come up on-screen as Patrick Troy!).
Usual rubbish from pants on fire saying that unless private car parks are 'managed' then 'you and I' will have nowhere to park! Yeh, right.
Michael acquitted himself very well - in extremely sharp contrast to PT!
Here's the link - scroll through to 5 minutes 30 seconds.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b04nv3g1/south-east-today-12112014Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.#Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0 -
Is it me or does (the real) Patrick Troy come across as a right plonker!0
-
Is it me or does (the real) Patrick Troy come across as a right plonker!
@fj - you certainly are a master of the under-statement. :rotfl:Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.#Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0 -
Is it me or does (the real) Patrick Troy come across as a right plonker!
I assume the 'real' bit is because the BBC muddled up the names of a rather handsome gentleman with the completely ugly conman ?
EDIT - and just in case I've emailed the builder in the piece just to make sure he knows not to pay the 'fine'."The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis." - Dante Alighieri0 -
Surely if the parking companies (I'm presuming majority are LTD) had anything about them, the directors would just wind the Co. up and then setup a new one? So whilst it may prevent fines in the future, the number getting refunds will be small. Unless I'm missing the point here and the refunds will come from the multinationals and NHS who employed these agents?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

