Comments Needed: Draft Guide to Claiming Flight Delay Compensation

Vauban

:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin
1001 DOWNLOADS !!!
:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin

http://db.orangedox.com/GdfSa4xUZdZI5GJadr/Vauban's%20Guide%20to%20Claiming%20Flight%20Delay%20Compensation.pdf

NoviceAngel

Vauban wrote: »

:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin
1001 DOWNLOADS !!!
:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin

:T:T:T:T:T:T
Congrats, I must admit though you can take a couple off your count, I'm guilty of taking a peak before I try and post to offer advice, well I try to come across as though I actually have read the guide

Vauban

:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin
er ... 999 DOWNLOADS !!!
:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin:staradmin

http://db.orangedox.com/GdfSa4xUZdZI5GJadr/Vauban's%20Guide%20to%20Claiming%20Flight%20Delay%20Compensation.pdf

Mark2spark

Worth a bump

JPears

noob day - bumped

Vauban

1150 downloads ...

NoviceAngel

:jCongrats as ever m8:j


I don't know if it's worth re-iterating how important it is to fill in the MCOL or N1 form with 100% accuracy - you will have seen a post in the Thomson thread, where a claimant made a typo in the defendants name and hence Thomson are trying to exploit this. Not a common mistake to make granted - but a very easy one. Notice how many times I edit my posts, in fact I'm off to re-read my claim form - see ya :A

legal_magpie

While I agree that it is important to check and double-check especially because with MCOL you cannot correct mistakes and you do not see the final version of the documents immediately before issuing. Having said that, Thomson would not get away with evading liability because of a typo. There is no prejudice to them whatsoever and if they tried it on, the Judge would permit an amendment even at the trial and would have harsh things to say. It doesn't do to get the Judge's back up even before the hearing starts.

NoviceAngel

legal_magpie wrote: »

Thomson would not get away with evading liability because of a typo.

Thanks for your legal input m8

I must admit it does seem ridiculous that Thomson are trying it on, but the court system is full of rules and regulations that non legal Joe Bloggs public try to follow and there's loads of guff on the net, saying what should be done in a case similar to this, when all it takes is a common sense approach. I keep saying that the small claims court is exactly that a place for a non legal person to take on the Goliath of the airlines and Joe should be permitted some slack by the Judges concerned.

I did my best to advise in this instance and I look forward to Angelasashes next post, saying that they had been awarded a shed load of cash because of Thomsons antics.

Cheers,

NoviceAngel

Vauban

Bumping ...