should i be worried

hoohoo

These days you ned to rebut the money breakdown because POPLA are not being consistent. Post it up and we will help

lancs-girl

sorry i don't know how to post it up. and what part do you want to see. sorry im a bit thick :-(

Redx

he means copy and paste what you have alleged, so the costs etc can be seen

your rebuttals to popla will look something similar to the one in here

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4995464

Umkomaas

Is this the breakdown you've received?

http://www.parkingticketappeals.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/merged_document-41.pdf

lancs-girl

yes Umkomaas that is exactly what i got in the evidence pack they sent me. http://www.parkingticketappeals.org....ocument-41.pdf

4consumerrights

In that case please ensure you upload this in evidence section of the POPLA website and email them a copy to. Called Evidencerebuttal. Title your email with your POPLA number. Do not attempt to deviate from the text below, or think it is in anyway too strong.


Fraudulent Loss Document
ANPR have produced a loss document to try and convince POPLA that its charges are a genuine pre estimate of loss.

First of all they include Staff costs which are business costs as they incurred in any case regardless as to whether someone breaches a parking regulation or not. These staff would still be employed and would have to be paid.
To state they would pay £5.75 per appeal in paper is beyond believable.

However the main issue and the one I believe that is fraudulent is the issue of the “legal advice they claim to get”

At the end bottom of the document (attached), they have stated:
“Legal and Professional Fees- Sought in chasing PCNS; On the basis our legal department charge in excess of £30 per hour and they spend approximately 1.5-2 hours, we estimate costs to be £60 per appeal”.
This statement is clearly false. ANPR do not have a legal department what so ever so this claim is completely fictitious. Therefore I believe this statement to be “Fraud by false representation” which is defined by Section 2 of the Act as a case where a person makes “any representation as to fact or law … express or implied” which they know to be untrue or misleading.

ANPR have confirmed they do not have a legal department.
They have created this document in an attempt to deceive POPLA.
In any case it is ludicrous that a solicitor/paralegal would spend 1.5/2 hours looking a POPLA appeal.

lancs-girl

it wont let me use my Verification number to upload more evidence

Verification number invalid - please re-enter the code. If it is not recognised please contact the operator who issued you with the verification code.

should i just send it email to
enquiries@popla.org.uk

could take 5 days for them to read it and that could be to late

or do i send it in a new appeal

ezerscrooge

Yes e-mail it and put your POPLA reference number in the email title.

lancs-girl

thank you so much i hope they get it in time :-) you lot are great :-)

i emailed it like you said to both

appeals@popla.org.uk

enquiries@popla.org.uk

Dee140157

Should hear back about a successful appeal soon then!